Elements of an Argument

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GPR VHS. Criteria of Credibility Can be used to assess the credibility of documents or individual sources. It has become standard to use the mnemonic.
Advertisements

Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
1 Charles Chaney’s VR Mastery Curriculum for Increasing Verbal Reasoning Scores.
A thinking map We have looked at a large number of pieces of reasoning types, and now we need a thinking map of how to best analyse, understand, and evaluate.
Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
Persuasive Essay Format: Introduction
Body Paragraphs Writing body paragraphs is always a T.R.E.A.T. T= Transition R= Reason/point from thesis/claim E= Evidence (quote from the text) A= Answer.
Historical Argument OCTOBER 3, AN ARGUMENT IS AN ATTEMPT TO ESTABLISH THE TRUTH OF A CLAIM. AN ARGUMENT OFTEN INCLUDES PREMISES, OR SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS.
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
Introduction to Logical Thinking Part One Argument Identification.
Organization of an Argument
Introduction to Logical Thinking. Introduction to Logical Thinking  Mrs. Lodato  Your Information:  Name  Phone #  Year in School  Major  What.
David Hume By Richard Jones and Dan Tedham. Biographical Details Born in 1711 in Scotland. Major work: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) Contains.
DECONSTRUCTION AND CRITICAL THINKING
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
Chapter 4 Main Ideas and Paragraph Structure
Logic and Persuasion AGED 520V. Logic and Persuasion Why do scientists need to know logic and persuasion? Scientists are writers and must persuade their.
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Two Types of Argument 1.Arguing a Position 2.Arguing a Solution.
SAT Reading Critical Reading Passages. Types of Passages The passages are about 100 to 850 words long. Some are from a single source, and others consist.
Critical Thinking Lesson 3 - Credibility Learning Objectives: 1. To be aware of what ‘credible’ means. 2. To understand what credibility criteria are and.
1 Lesson 7: Arguments SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
Critical Thinking Lesson 2 Arguments and Conclusions – The Indicators Learning Objectives: 1.To be aware of what argument indicators are. 2.To be able.
Argumentative Evaluation and Writing
Essay Organizer The Introduction The Hook (How will you grab your reader’s attention and/or establish credibility?) Background/Context Reference.
Preparing to teach OCR GCSE (9-1) Geography B (Geography for Enquiring Minds) Planning, constructing and introducing your new course.
Critical Thinking and Arguments
Arguments and Conclusions
The Body Paragraphs American Literature 11.
Evaluate Parliament as a Law-Maker
Identifying/ Reconstructing Arguments
Understanding Fallacy
Thinking Skills Paper 2.
Persuasive Essay Format: Introduction
Chapter 9: Successful Paragraphs
Criteria Of Credibility
Elements of Argument The Toulmin Model.
Writing a Balanced Argument.
Essay Writing Workshop
H070 Topic Title H470 Topic Title.
Chapter 8: Recognizing Arguments
Ap History LEQ Chalkboard Talk #3: Periodization
Activity 2.11: Understanding argumentative elements
Last Lesson Homework- find an argument and ‘mark it up’
Critical Thinking Process
Essay 4: Response Essay Responding to Reading.
Argumentative Writing
Building Argument and Integrating Evidence
Chapter 5: Identifying Supporting Details and Transitions
Part Three: Topic Sentences & Evidence
The Power of Critical Thinking
The argumentative essay
Criteria Of Credibility
Credibility of Evidence
Scholastic Aptitude Test Developing Critical Reading Skills
The argumentative essay
What is an ARGUMENT? An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid. Arguments seek.
The discursive essay.
Critical Thinking.
Elements of Persuasive Writing
II. Analyzing Arguments
ACADEMIC DEBATE.
PERSUASIVE TEXTS.
Unit 2 Read, wRite, and Research
Building an Academic Argument
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Argumentative writing
Information, data, maps & photos explanation & analysis
Argumentation and Persuasion
Presentation transcript:

Elements of an Argument Learning Objectives identify and explain the difference between reasons, evidence and conclusions identify and explain the difference between facts, opinions and examples

The elements of an argument Any statement that attempts to persuade you that something is true by offering at least one reason for thinking that it is so counts as an argument The main elements of arguments are reasons and a conclusion The ability to read a passage and pick out its conclusion and the reasons offered in support of it is perhaps the most basic skill required for Critical Thinking

Reasons The reasons (premises) in an argument are the claims made in an attempt to persuade you that the conclusion is true A test that can help you to identify the reasons in a passage is the ‘because test’. Simply insert the word “because” into the passage directly before the phrase that you think is a reason. If the passage makes sense, then you’ve probably got the right section. If it doesn’t, then you haven’t.

Conclusions The conclusion of an argument is the main point that it is trying to get you to accept. You’ll often (but not always) find this statement either at the beginning or the end of a passage. It may be indicated by a word such as “therefore”, “thus”, or even “in conclusion”. A test that can help you to identify the conclusion of a passage is the ‘therefore test’. Simply insert the word “therefore” into the passage directly before the phrase that you think is the conclusion. If the passage makes sense, then you’ve probably got the right section. If it doesn’t, then you haven’t.

Indicator words There are certain words that often indicate the presence of a particular element of an argument Conclusions are often indicated by one of the following words or phrases: “Therefore”; “thus”; “hence”; “so”; “in conclusion”; “consequently”; “showing that”; “demonstrating that”; “proving that”; “establishing that”; “meaning that”; “entails that”; “implies that”; “as a result”. “Should”, “must”, and “ought to” may also be treated as indicator words, albeit cautiously. Indicator words for reasons include the following: “Because”; “as”; “since”; “in order to”; “otherwise”. Sometimes authors enumerate their reasons, writing “First, …”, “Second, …”, “Third, …” etc., which can help in their identification.

Example Parents should control how children use mobile phones. (CONCLUSION) Firstly, in many cases children use the devices during the night, causing them to lose sleep and be distracted from study. (REASON 1) Secondly, since children tend to use phones more frequently than adults (with studies showing that they may send up to 80 SMS messages per day) there are often significant cost implications. (REASON 2) Finally, the health risks associated with prolonged usage are still unknown, particularly in relation to developing bodies. (REASON 3)

Evidence. Criteria of credibility (RAVEN) R = Reputation (does the source’s history or status suggest reliability or unreliability?) A = Ability to See (is the source in a position to know what they’re talking about?) V = Vested Interest (has the source of the information got anything personally at stake?) E = Expertise (does the source have specialised knowledge and does the situation demand it?) N = Neutrality (is the source predisposed to support a particular point of view for reasons other than vested interest).