SPPC Longitudinal Dynamics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Advertisements

Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Intra-beam Scattering -- a RHIC Perspective J. Wei, W. Fischer Collider-Accelerator Department EIC Workshop,
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Lattice design for IBS dominated beams August th, 2007 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU IBS ’07 – Intra Beam Scattering mini workshop, The Cockcroft Institute,
0 1 Alternative Options in the Injectors – Preliminary Summary H. Damerau LIU-TM#8 18 October 2013 Many thanks for discussions and input to T. Argyropoulos,
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
Comparison between simulations and measurements in the LHC with heavy ions T. Mertens, R. Bruce, J.M. Jowett, H. Damerau,F. Roncarolo.
Elias Métral, SPSU Study Group and Task Force on SPS Upgrade meeting, 25/03/2010 /311 TMCI Intensity Threshold for LHC Bunch(es) in the SPS u Executive.
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
IBS and Touschek studies for the ion beam at the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Bohl.
Pros and Cons of the 200 MHz System G. Iadarola, K. Li, E. Metral, G. Rumolo Thanks to: L. Medina, J. Esteban Mueller, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova, R.
Alexei Fedotov, December 7, Beam parameters and collective effects for pEDM ring (December 7, 2009)
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Parameters of ejected beam
Loss of Landau damping for reactive impedance and a double RF system
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Theory, observations and mitigation of dancing bunches in the Tevatron
Harmonic system for LHC
Harmonic system for LHC
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Longitudinal impedance of the SPS
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
Longitudinal Effects in Space Charge Dominated Cooled Bunched Beams
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
New AD Production Beam in the PSB
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
The SPS 800 MHz RF system E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF
Collective effects in CEPC
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS/i-RCS
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral, D. Möhl, G. Rumolo and B. Salvant
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Simulating transition crossing in the PS with HeadTail
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
MEIC low rep-rate operation and path length
Presentation transcript:

SPPC Longitudinal Dynamics Linhao Zhang, Jingyu Tang Nov. 13, 2018 Good morning, everyone! It's my honor to be here to make a presentation. My talk is SPPC longitudinal beam dynamics.

Outline Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics for 400 MHz 800 MHz RF system 400 + 800 MHz dual harmonic RF system Results and comparison Matching between injectors Summary

Collisions at crossing angle Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics at 400 MHz The basic starting point According to the basic requirements for luminosity, and meanwhile taking luminosity upgrade into account. Besides, leaving a margin of certain parameter space for RF system to upgrade. Luminosity Luminosity: (head-on) Two effects lowering luminosity: beam current : beam-beam parameter : Collisions at crossing angle ρ1(x,y,s,-s0) ρ2(x,y,s,s0) θc

Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics at 400 MHz Luminosity Φ is Piwinski Angle σz=0.0755 hourglss effect The larger β*/σz, the higher the luminosity. Only a little effect on luminosity by shortening bunch length. β*/σz>>1, it can be neglected. Luminosity upgrade measures: decreasing β*, meanwhile shortening bunch length; increasing beam-beam parameter; increasing bunch numeber in order to increase single beam current

The requirements for SPPC longitudinal dynamics Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics at 400 MHz The requirements for SPPC longitudinal dynamics Input parameters Value Circumference (km) 100 Energy (TeV) 37.5 Transition gamma γtr 99.21 Bunch intensity 1.5 x1011 Number of bunches 10080 Bunch spacing (ns) 25 Bunch length during physics (m) 0.0755 RF frequency (MHz) 400 Two constraints: Intra-beam Scattering Beam instability limits The goals: How to achieve this goal of bunch length 7.55cm. The variable range of bunch length for luminosity upgrade. The design of longitudinal dynamics Determination of longitudinal emittance (IBS and beam instabilities need to be considered, pivotal issue); Given bunch length, we can get momentum spread; Determination of RF cavity voltage ( frf = 400MHz )

Intra-beam Scattering (IBS) Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics at 400 MHz Intra-beam Scattering (IBS) Intrabeam Scattering (IBS): Multiple small-angle Coulomb scattering of charged particle beams An increase in both transverse and longitudinal emittance. The effects of IBS: Redistribution of beam momenta Beam diffusion with impact on the beam quality (Brightness, luminosity, etc) IBS growth rate: Theoretical models and their approximations Classical models of Piwinski (P) and Bjorken - Mtingwa (BM) Complicated integrals averaged around the rings. Depend on optics and beam properties. High energy approximations Bane, CIMP, J.Wei, etc Integrals with analytic solutions Tools: MADX, BETACOOL, etc

Intra-beam Scattering (IBS) Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics at 400 MHz Intra-beam Scattering (IBS) Injection Collision At injection, longitudinal emittance between 1.5 eVs and 2.5 eVs may be a good choice; (injection time 840s) In collision, longitudinal emittance between 6 eVs and 9 eVs may be a good choice; (time during physics 14.2h)

Beam instability limits Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics at 400 MHz Beam instability limits Two instability bottlenecks: Loss of Landau damping Transverse mode coupling instability (TMCI) Landau damping of the instability can come from the spread in the synchrotron frequency due to the nonlinearity of the synchrotron force in the bunch. The coherent tune shift induced by the broad-band impedance for a longitudinal mode of order n can be approximate to The synchrotron tune spread Requiring the impedance threshold

Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics at 400 MHz σz≥8 cm, (Z/n)th≥0.1Ω σz=7.55 cm, Vrf ≥ 32MV (Z/n)th≥0.1Ω easy to bunch-receiving from SS Shorter bunch length (luminosity upgrade) smaller longitudinal impedance. These two pictures show the longitudinal impedance threshold varies with bunch length at injection and collision, respectively. At injection, RMS bunch length is at least 8cm in order that longitudinal impedance threshold is lager than 0.1Ω, and it's easy to bunch-receiving from SS. To reach the bunch length 7.55cm, the RF voltage at least 32MV may be a good choice, and it sets an impedance threshold of 0.1Ω approximately. But for a shorter bunch length, it will set a more stringent requirement for longitudinal impedance. Therefore, longitudinal impedance of less than 0.1Ω needs to be studied. Besides, one way to increase the longitudinal impedance threshold is to increase the synchrotron tune spread, such as installing a higher harmonic cavity, so 800MHz RF cavity needs to be studied. Injection: σz=9 cm, 0.182 Ω @20 MV; Collision: σz=7.55 cm, 0.152 Ω @40 MV Longitudinal impedance less than 0.1 Ω needs to be studied! In order to Landau damp longitudinal coupled-bunch instability, a large spread in synchrotron frequency inside the bunch is required. One way: install a higher harmonic cavity (800MHz RF cavity needs to be studied)

Beam instability limits Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics at 400 MHz Beam instability limits Transverse mode coupling instability (TMCI) This instability arises when the relative tune shift of two adjacent head-tail modes equals the synchrotron tune. The corresponding impedance threshold : injection collision βav=290m βav=208m σz≥8 cm, Vrf≥20MV ZT≥ 6MΩ/m σz=7.55 cm, Vrf ≥ 32MV ZT≥ 80MΩ/m Shorter bunch length (luminosity upgrade) more stringent requirement for transverse impedance. Transverse impedance of less than 80MΩ/m needs to be studied !

Parameter design of SPPC longitudinal dynamics at 400 MHz The momentum spread and longitudinal emittance dependence on RF voltage at given σz=7.55cm and frf=400MHz. SPPC total RF voltage variable range: 20—60 MV (in collision) The design values: 8.4eVs, 0.71x10-4 @ 40MV Momentum spread will be always less than 1x10-4! Filling factor in momentum Wbk Wb -2π 2π (small amplitude) (accurate)

800 MHz RF system One way to relieve the restriction of beam instabilities is to use a higher harmonic RF system (800MHz). 7.55 cm @ 800 MHz, qp > 0.9, i.e. significant beam loss. So the rms. bunch length will have to be reduced if using 800 MHz RF cavity. qp ≤ 0.8 --> σz ≤ 5.56 cm; the goal bunch length is set as σz =5.2 cm, then qp=76.2%; Correspondingly: εs=6.4eVs, VRF=52MV, σδ=0.79x10-4 The corresponding impedance threshold: Both transverse and longitudinal impedance thresholds have been improved to some extent at 800 MHz.

400 MHz + 800 MHz dual harmonic RF system Applied RF voltage is: in (φ, ΔE/ω0) phase space, the Hamiltonian is The potential well is In normalised phase space , the Hamiltonian is Bunch lengthening mode (BLM): n=2, k=0.5, 2=0, for >0 Bunch shortening mode (BSM): n=2, k=0.5, 2=, for >0 ABLM/Asingle~1.1478, ABSM/Asingle~0.7854; The bucket height keeps the same.

400 MHz + 800 MHz dual harmonic RF system The BLM is used much more often: For the same voltage and harmonic ratios it gives larger synchrotron frequency spread. provides larger bucket area as well as reduced peak line density and therefore reduced space charge effects. For SPPC, 400 + 800 MHz dual harmonic RF system (BSM) can be considered.

Results and Comparison

Results and Comparison Comparison among 400MHz, 800MHz, 400+800MHz(BSM) Both transverse and longitudinal impedance thresholds have been improved to some extent at 800MHz. Compared with 400 MHz, both the bucket area and bucket height for 800 MHz are reduced, but bunch filling factor is still within rational range. RMS bunch length shorter, Luminosity increased by 7%. Beam stability can also be improved using 400MHz+800MHz dual harmonic RF system working on BSM mode because the average synchrotron tune and tune spread are increased. Similarly, the bucket area is reduced to some extent and momentum filling factor increased, but bunch length is shorter. RF power requirements and costs are not considered in detail at present.

Matching between injector chain Matched bunch-to-bucket transfer Requirements: stationary bucket; the physical aspect ratio of the bunch/bucket remains unchanged in sending and receiving accelerators. Benifits: More stable; Time structure preserved; H. Damerau. Timing, Synchronization & Longitudinal Aspects, CAS 2017. Phase space aspect ratio: the voltage ratio between RF systems: Other considerations: Longitudinal emittance is conserved during transfer to the next; Furthermore, bunch length is conserved during transfer. Longitudinal emittance may blow up during acceleration at each ring, but keep constant as far as possible;

SS ring RF consideration: Injection: 200MHz, extraction: 200/400MHz; Or dual harmonic RF system

MSS ring injection into SPPC beam application

Summary Summary Next to do SPPC longitudinal dynamics parameters for injection@200 MHz+ Collision@400 MHz, injection@400MHz + Collision@800MHz, injection@200MHz + Collision@400MHz+800MHz dual harmonic RF system (BSM) have been considered and compared to achieve the required bunch length and stability. Both transverse and longitudinal impedance threshold have been improved to some extent with 800 MHz RF system or 400MHz+800MHz dual harmonic RF system, meanwhile the bunch length becomes shorter, which is beneficial to luminosity. IBS is not an extremely severe problem for SPPC; Preliminary parameters design of SS and MSS have been given taking matching between injectors and IBS into consideration. Finally, I make a summary. SPPC longitudinal dynamics parameters for these three RF cases have been considered and compared. Both transverse and longitudinal impedance threshold have been improved to some extent with 800 MHz RF system or 400MHz+800MHz dual harmonic RF system, meanwhile the bunch length becomes shorter, which is beneficial to luminosity. IBS is not an extremely severe problem for SPPC; Next, I will study Beam instability criteria for dual harmonic RF system. Longitudinal dynamics of injector chain considering space charge and beam instability; Next to do Beam instability criteria for dual harmonic RF system. Longitudinal dynamics of injector chain considering space charge and beam instability; Special study for p-RCS is needed;

Thanks for your attention !