Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Most slides from September 2006 MAC meeting ILC Cost Versus Performance (Parameter Choices) Tor Raubenheimer SLAC.
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
Bunch length modulation in storage rings C. Biscari LNF – INFN - Frascati Workshop on “Frontiers of short bunches in storage rings” – Frascati – 7-8 Nov.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
Super B-Factory Workshop, Hawaii, April 20-22, 2005 Lattice studies for low momentum compaction in LER M.E. Biagini LNF-INFN, Frascati.
First approach to the SuperB Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN April 26th, 2006 UK SuperB Meeting, Daresbury.
1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
Linear Super-B Factory Progress John T. Seeman FPCP Workshop Vancouver BC April 9, 2006.
Issues for Optimization of a Super-B Factory John T. Seeman SBF Workshop SLAC June 14, 2006.
The strategy of Accelerator based High Energy Physics of China J. Gao On behalf of CEPC+SppC Group IHEP, CAS, China Roundtable discussion: “Future machines“
Beam-beam simulations M.E. Biagini, K. Ohmi, E. Paoloni, P. Raimondi, D. Shatilov, M. Zobov INFN Frascati, KEK, INFN Pisa, SLAC, BINP April 26th, 2006.
Is there synergy between ILC and SuperB? Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Status on SuperB effort Frascati, March 16, 2006 P. Raimondi.
SuperB Design Progress Paris, Jan 27, 2007 P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team.
New Ideas for a Super B Factory Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh ILC Forum, Cosener’s House, May 2006.
Frank Zimmermann, CLIC “Away Day” 28 March 2006  x * Limitations and Improvements Paths Damping Rings Maxim Korostelev, Frank Zimmermann.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
Status on SuperB effort Daresbury, April 26, 2006 P. Raimondi.
New Ideas for Super B Factories for Flavour Physics Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh, Future Directions, BEACH 2006 Lancaster, July 2006.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
2 nd workshop on SuperB 17.03,2006 LNF Marcello A Giorgi1 Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa and INFN Pisa Closeout Remarks 2nd Workshop on SuperB FRASCATI.
For Layout of ILC , revised K.Kubo Based on following choices. Positron source: Prepare both conventional and undulator based. Place the.
A.Variola B. What is the ‘crab waist’ scheme? And why does it make a high luminosity factory possible? Machine parameters ILC & SuperB.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Positron Sources of Next generation B-factories (SuperKEKB, SuperB)
Design and Parameters for a linearly colliding Super B-FACTORY
The Interaction Region
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
2nd Workshop on a Super B-Factory INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy
sx* Limitations and Improvements Paths
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Muon Acceleration using 8 GeV Proton Driver Linac
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Beam beam simulations with disruption (work in progress...)
SuperB Accelerator Overview and Status
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
SuperB Workshop Frascati March 16, 2006
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Summary of Washington DOE Review
Super-B Accelerator Overview
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
Polarization at the Super-B Factory
Cost Algorithm for a Super-B Factory
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Used PEP-II 476 MHz Cavities for MEIC Collider Rings
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Beam-beam simulations
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Presentation transcript:

Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel John T. Seeman SBF Workshop at Frascati March 16, 2006

Motivation Use an existing tunnel and injector (2200 m) Use existing RF system (476 MHz) Make two rings for each beam in the tunnel First ring provides damping and low emittances in x, y, and z planes Second ring is for bunch compression by a factor of about x6 Second ring has an ILC final focus for collisions Collide every bunch on every turn (really two turns= 4400 m) Collide 4 x 7 GeV with bunches 1 m apart Keep bunch charges and beam currents at about present or soon-to-be levels. Keep beam-beam parameters at the present PEP-II / KEKB levels (or very nearly)  Do not need short damping times which saves AC power!

PEP-II Parameters C = 2200 m

Super-KEKB Parameters C = 3016 m

crossing angle optional Raimondi Feb 2006 ILC ring with ILC FF ILC Compressor Colliding every turn crossing angle optional C = 6000 m Decompressor Decompressor FF FF IP Compressor Compressor

Layout of One Ring: Other Ring is the Reverse! Linac injector Bunch compressor Bunch expander Damping ring = 2200 m Final Focus IP And Detector Reverse Final Focus

Super-B-Factory in a 4400 m Tunnel 0.4 mm

SUPER-B Factory in a 4400 m tunnel 0.3 mm

SBF as shown in Traditional Ring Collider Parameters Emittances = 12.x1.5 nm

Approximate AC Power PEP-II (2200 m) (1 ring LER and HER) RF AC Power LER at 3.1 GeV = 1 MeV/turn x 4 A x 2 = 8 MW RF AC Power HER at 9.0 GeV = 3.6 MeV/turn x 2 A x 2 = 14.5 MW Total RF AC power = 22.5 MW. Super-B factory (4400 m) (2 rings LER and HER) RF AC Power LER at 4 GeV ~ 1.8 MeV/turn x 4 A x 2 x 2= 29 MW RF AC Power HER at 7.0 GeV ~ 2.2 MeV/turn x 2.5 A x 2 x 2= 22 MW Total RF AC power = 51 MW.

First Look at Bunch Compression With a long damping time, each ring has a natural energy spread of about 2.5E-4. The natural bunch lengths will be about 3 mm. The desired bunch length at the IP is about 0.5 mm. The needed compression is a factor of 6. The energy spread at the collision point is then about 1.3 E-3 for both beams. Probably ok. (?) The RF compressors are likely ~1.43 GHz (3 x 476) with 65 MV and 110 MV with lengths about 10 and 20 m of SC structures but use very little power.

Conclusions Colliding every turn helps with the collision rate. The ILC final focus will allow very small by* = 0.4 mm. The beam emittances are not very small (12 nm x 1.5 nm). Bunch compressors are needed to shorten the bunch. Having two “loops” per ring in a tunnel allows adequate damping in one ring, room for bunch compression and final focus in the other, and twice as many bunches. Standard beam-beam parameters can keep the needed damping time long and the AC power low. We must study further the bunch compression and Final Focus beam issues.