Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stratospheric Measurements: Microwave Sounders I. Current Methods – MSU4/AMSU9 Diurnal Adjustment Merging II. Problems and Limitations III. Other AMSU.
Advertisements

Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Long-Term Upper Air Temperature.
Yimin Ji - Page 1 October 5, 2010 Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Precipitation Processing System (PPS) Yimin Ji NASA/GSFC,
1 Detection and Determination of Channel Frequency Shift in AMSU-A Observations Cheng-Zhi Zou and Wenhui Wang IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada, July 24-28,
Development of AMSU-A Fundamental CDR’s Huan Meng 1, Wenze Yang 2, Ralph Ferraro 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/CoRP/Satellite Climate Studies Branch 2 NOAA Corporate.
THE NOAA SSU STRATOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE CLIMATE DATA RECORD Cheng-Zhi Zou NOAA/NESDIS/Center For Satellite Applications and Research Haifeng Qian, Lilong.
Inter-calibration of Operational IR Sounders using CLARREO Bob Holz, Dave Tobin, Fred Nagle, Bob Knuteson, Fred Best, Hank Revercomb Space Science and.
Obs-sim[ECMWF] obs-sim[AIRS] Dashed curve = ECMWF curve shifted to AIRS curve at nadir This is our best estimate of scan bias Motivation: AIRS-retrieval.
An Improved Microwave Satellite Data Set for Hydrological and Meteorological Applications Wenze Yang 1, Huan Meng 2, and Ralph Ferraro 2 1. UMD/ESSIC/CICS,
MOLLY E. BROWN, PHD NASA GODDARD GIMMS Group Challenges of AVHRR Vegetation Data for Real Time Applications.
Characterizing Diurnal Calibration Variations using Double-Differences Fangfang Yu.
June, GSICS USER GUIDE Using GSICS Products and Services Manik Bali, Tim Hewison, Larry Flynn and Jerome Lafeuille 2016 GSICS Executive Panel Meeting.
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS Likun Wang 1, Yong Han 2*, Denis Tremblay 3, Fuzhong Weng 2, and Mitch Goldberg 4 1. CICS/ESSIC/University of.
Aqua-MODIS and VIIRS DCC calibration
Ann Mari Fjæraa Philipp Schneider Tove Svendby
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
Pre-launch Characteristics and Calibration
Manik Bali Ralph Ferraro , Cheng-Zhi Zou and Lawrence E. Flynn
Planned Activities of GSICS Microwave sub-group
Precipitation Classification and Analysis from AMSU
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
In-orbit Microwave Reference Records
NOAA Inter-Calibrated MSU/AMSU Radiance FCDR Cheng-Zhi Zou
Traceability and Uncertainty of GSICS Infrared Reference Sensors
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
GSICS Microwave Sub-Group Summary Tim Hewison and Cheng-Zhi Zou
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
Update from the GRWG/Microwave Subgroup
An Overview of MODIS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong NASA / GSFC GRWG Web Meeting on Reference Instruments and Their Traceability.
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
Requirements for microwave inter-calibration
M. Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Z. Cheng (QSS)
Closing the GEO-ring Tim Hewison
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
Manik Bali1 Cheng-Zhi Zou2 and Ralph Ferraro2 1ESSIC/CICS, 2NOAA
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
NOAA GSICS Processing and Research Center
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
National Satellite Meteorological Centre
GRWG MW-SubGroup Candidate GSICS products – Window Channels
Comparability and Reproducibility of RO Data
MW Products and Deliverables
Calibration and Validation of Microwave Humidity Sounder onboard FY-3D Satellite Yang Guo, Songyan Gu NSMC/CMA Mar
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Where do we stand on GSICS MW products?
Na Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen, Min Min
SRF Retrieval Using VIIRS/AIRS/IASI radiances
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
GRUAN / GSICS Cheng-Zhi Zou and Tony Reale NOAA/STAR
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Formation of IR Sub-Group and Reference Selection
GSICS Product Development Plan for Microwave Instruments
goes-16/17 abi lunar calibration
Progress with GRUAN observations in comparisons with
FY-3D/HIRAS On-orbit performance and validation
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Why use NWP for GSICS? It is crucial for climate and very desirable for NWP that we understand the characteristics of satellite radiance biases Simultaneous.
Sno Unit testing tool MaNIK BALI NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Sno Prediction and Unit testing
Selecting a GSICS reference instrument IR , VIS and Microwave
Atmospheric reanalysis at ECMWF
How good is IASI-A as an in-orbit reference in GSICS in LWIR and IR
GSICS Newsletter Microwave mini issue
Presentation transcript:

Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion) 20 May 2019 Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion) Manik Bali1 Cheng-Zhi Zou2 , Wenze Yang, and Ralph Ferraro2 1ESSIC/CICS, 2NOAA

Best Practices: Simultaneous Nadir Overpass SNO ( Simultaneous Nadir Overpass) Algorithm identifies locations observed by two instruments under similar viewing conditions. This algorithm is used to monitor In-orbit Microwave Instruments. Inter-comparing MW instruments reveals biases anomalies and Trends in instruments. SNO matchups can accurately determine the differences of the offsets as well as the nonlinear coefficients between satellite pairs, thus providing a strong constraint to link calibration coefficients of different satellites together. MSU channel 2 brightness temperature differences of the nadir pixels between NOAA 10 and 11 versus time window for the SNO matchups. The maximum spatial distance for the SNOs is set to 111 km. Note that when the time difference is larger than about 100 s, only few SNO data pairs can be found. The brightness temperature is computed from the linear calibration algorithm equation (9).( Zou et al 2006) SNO Code from Cheng-Zhi Zou can be shared in the MW Subgroup

Proposed Best Practices: Simultaneous Nadir Overpass Window Channels ( 23 GhZ, 31 GhZ, 50 GhZ 89 GhZ. ( by Wenze Yang ) 1. within 50~70 km 2. < 50 seconds 3. no 4. dTB <= 10 * NEdT (as homogeneity test) Oxygen Bands ( 50-58 GhZ) (by Cheng-Zhi Zou) 1. within 111 km 2. < 100 seconds 3. Scan Angle within 1 degree Homogenouty test ( std < 1) What are the BP for SSMI (F series) and GEO-LEO intercomparision ) ?

Pre-Launch Best Practices Proposed Best Practice Matrix for Pre-Launch Characterization Detector Characteristics (Freq, Side Lobe, Response) Non Linearity -> What is your instrument’s non linearity Antenna Pattern Correction-> How do you correct for antenna NEdT-> What is your measure of noise .. Can we agree on one standard ? Internal Calibration Targets are Characterized to SI Standards-> What standards do you follow. How do you characterize the Space View at Pre-Launch What is your absolute accuracy estimate and does it meet specs Proposed Action: Members to share pre-launch Matrix information in the Microwave Subgroup

Thank You