The crystal structure of bacteriophage Qβ at 3.5 å resolution

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
The structure of OmpF porin in a tetragonal crystal form
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
The crystal structure of bovine bile salt activated lipase: insights into the bile salt activation mechanism  Xiaoqiang Wang, Chi-sun Wang, Jordan Tang,
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
The Crystal Structure of the Human Hepatitis B Virus Capsid
Human rhinovirus 3 at 3.0 å resolution
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages (November 1998)
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
15 Å Resolution Model of the Monomeric Kinesin Motor, KIF1A
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Danny N.P Doan, Terje Dokland  Structure 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
The structure of coxsackievirus B3 at 3.5 å resolution
The 1.8 Å crystal structure of catechol 1,2-dioxygenase reveals a novel hydrophobic helical zipper as a subunit linker  Matthew W Vetting, Douglas H Ohlendorf 
The sequence, crystal structure determination and refinement of two crystal forms of lipase B from Candida antarctica  Jonas Uppenberg, Mogens Trier Hansen,
Martin Klumpp, Wolfgang Baumeister, Lars-Oliver Essen  Cell 
Crystal structure of the ternary complex of 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene reductase from Magnaporthe grisea with NADPH and an active-site inhibitor  Arnold.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Three-dimensional structure of the human protective protein: structure of the precursor form suggests a complex activation mechanism  Gabby Rudenko, Erik.
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages (October 2000)
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 1994)
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Huiying Li, Michael R. Sawaya, F. Robert Tabita, David Eisenberg 
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Crystal structures of Nova-1 and Nova-2 K-homology RNA-binding domains
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
The Crystal Structure of a TL/CD8αα Complex at 2.1 Å Resolution
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages (September 1997)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
Stanley J Watowich, John J Skehel, Don C Wiley  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

The crystal structure of bacteriophage Qβ at 3.5 å resolution Roshan Golmohammadi, Kerstin Fridborg, Maija Bundule, Karin Valegård, Lars Liljas  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 543-554 (May 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3

Figure 1 R-factor versus resolution for the final model. Data for a number of different σ cut-offs are shown; no cut-off (329 000 reflections), 2.5σ (250 000 reflections), 5σ (183 000 reflections) and 10σ (143 000 reflections). Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 2 Ramachandran plot for the final model. Triangles denote glycine residues and boxes denote non-glycine residues. The two residues found in the ‘generously allowed regions’ are ArgB57 and AsnB58. Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 3 Electron density stereodiagram for the F and G β strands of the A subunit. The Cα atom of residue A89 is marked. Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 4 Structure of the Qβ subunits. (a) Stereo drawing showing the three structurally independent subunits A, B, and C. (b) Schematic drawing of a B subunit. The strands are denoted A–G. The secondary structure is defined by DSSP [35]. Strand A (residues 17–20), B (21–27), C (32–36), D (47–53), E (62–74), F (83–96). The two helices comprise residues 102–117 and 119–126. (c) Schematic drawing showing the subunit arrangement in Qβ. The three subunits A (yellow), B (green), and C (blue) representing an icosahedral asymmetric unit are shown in dark colors, and the three symmetry-related subunits A′, B′ and C′ completing the dimers are shown in light colors. All the loops forming the interactions at the fivefold (5) and threefold (3) axes are included. The view is from the outside of the particle down a twofold axis. (Drawings made using the program MOLSCRIPT [36].) Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 4 Structure of the Qβ subunits. (a) Stereo drawing showing the three structurally independent subunits A, B, and C. (b) Schematic drawing of a B subunit. The strands are denoted A–G. The secondary structure is defined by DSSP [35]. Strand A (residues 17–20), B (21–27), C (32–36), D (47–53), E (62–74), F (83–96). The two helices comprise residues 102–117 and 119–126. (c) Schematic drawing showing the subunit arrangement in Qβ. The three subunits A (yellow), B (green), and C (blue) representing an icosahedral asymmetric unit are shown in dark colors, and the three symmetry-related subunits A′, B′ and C′ completing the dimers are shown in light colors. All the loops forming the interactions at the fivefold (5) and threefold (3) axes are included. The view is from the outside of the particle down a twofold axis. (Drawings made using the program MOLSCRIPT [36].) Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 4 Structure of the Qβ subunits. (a) Stereo drawing showing the three structurally independent subunits A, B, and C. (b) Schematic drawing of a B subunit. The strands are denoted A–G. The secondary structure is defined by DSSP [35]. Strand A (residues 17–20), B (21–27), C (32–36), D (47–53), E (62–74), F (83–96). The two helices comprise residues 102–117 and 119–126. (c) Schematic drawing showing the subunit arrangement in Qβ. The three subunits A (yellow), B (green), and C (blue) representing an icosahedral asymmetric unit are shown in dark colors, and the three symmetry-related subunits A′, B′ and C′ completing the dimers are shown in light colors. All the loops forming the interactions at the fivefold (5) and threefold (3) axes are included. The view is from the outside of the particle down a twofold axis. (Drawings made using the program MOLSCRIPT [36].) Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 5 Sequence alignments of a number of small RNA phages. The sequences of the E. coli phages MS2 [37], fr [38], GA [39], Qβ [40] and SP [41] as well as the Pseudomonas phages PRR1 [42] and PP7 [43] are shown. MS2 and fr belongs to group I, GA to group II, Qβ to group III and SP to group IV. The top row shows the position of secondary structural elements in Qβ. Conserved amino acid residues in the E. coli phages and in all phages are marked in rows E. coli and All, respectively. This alignment differs from earlier ones in that the Qβ and SP EF loops are 2 residues longer. In addition the FG loop is two residues shorter than in MS2. The alignment must be regarded as tentative for PRR1 and PP7, since the sequence similarity is very low. Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 6 Comparison of Qβ and MS2. (a) Stereo drawing showing three dimers of Qβ and MS2. View down the twofold axis of the icosahedron. The MS2 subunits (thin lines) are found at a lower radius. (b) Stereo drawing showing the superposition of an AB dimer of MS2 (thin lines) on Qβ (thick lines). The superposition was based on the Cα coordinates of the residues in the ten-stranded sheet. Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 6 Comparison of Qβ and MS2. (a) Stereo drawing showing three dimers of Qβ and MS2. View down the twofold axis of the icosahedron. The MS2 subunits (thin lines) are found at a lower radius. (b) Stereo drawing showing the superposition of an AB dimer of MS2 (thin lines) on Qβ (thick lines). The superposition was based on the Cα coordinates of the residues in the ten-stranded sheet. Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 7 Conformation of the FG loops. (a) Stereodiagram of the electron density around the threefold axis showing the disulphide bridges between the FG loops. Six FG loops, three from each of the A and C subunits, extend towards the axis. The disulphide bridges are seen as thick connections between these loops. There is a high degree of similarity between the densities of the FG loops in the A and C subunits. (b) Conformation of the FG loops around the five-fold axis. Stereo drawing of residues B72 to B84 and A97 to A100. Carbon atoms are yellow, nitrogen atoms blue, oxygen atoms red and sulfur atoms green. Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 7 Conformation of the FG loops. (a) Stereodiagram of the electron density around the threefold axis showing the disulphide bridges between the FG loops. Six FG loops, three from each of the A and C subunits, extend towards the axis. The disulphide bridges are seen as thick connections between these loops. There is a high degree of similarity between the densities of the FG loops in the A and C subunits. (b) Conformation of the FG loops around the five-fold axis. Stereo drawing of residues B72 to B84 and A97 to A100. Carbon atoms are yellow, nitrogen atoms blue, oxygen atoms red and sulfur atoms green. Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 8 A comparison of the RNA-binding sites in MS2 and Qβ. (a) Overview of an AB dimer of Qβ (yellow) and MS2 (green). The side chains of a number of residues in Qβ, corresponding to those interacting with RNA in the repressor–operator complex in MS2 are shown. (b) Stereo drawing of the RNA-binding surface of the dimer. Side chains of both Qβ (yellow) and MS2 (green) are shown. The atom colours for the side chains of Qβ are yellow (carbon), dark blue (nitrogen) and red (oxygen). The corresponding atoms in the MS2 side chains are green, light blue and orange. Side chains included are (Qβ residue in parenthesis) ValA29 (A32), ThrA45 (A49), SerA47 (A51), ArgA49 (SerA53), ThrA59 (GlnA65), LysA61 (A67), GluA63 (GlnA69), TyrA85 (A89), AsnA87 (AspA91), ValB29 (B32), ThrB45 (B49), SerB47 (B51), ArgB49 (SerB53), SerB51 (not included in Qβ), SerB52 (B56), AsnB55 (B61), LysB57 (B63), ThrB59(GlnB65) and LysB61 (B67). Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 8 A comparison of the RNA-binding sites in MS2 and Qβ. (a) Overview of an AB dimer of Qβ (yellow) and MS2 (green). The side chains of a number of residues in Qβ, corresponding to those interacting with RNA in the repressor–operator complex in MS2 are shown. (b) Stereo drawing of the RNA-binding surface of the dimer. Side chains of both Qβ (yellow) and MS2 (green) are shown. The atom colours for the side chains of Qβ are yellow (carbon), dark blue (nitrogen) and red (oxygen). The corresponding atoms in the MS2 side chains are green, light blue and orange. Side chains included are (Qβ residue in parenthesis) ValA29 (A32), ThrA45 (A49), SerA47 (A51), ArgA49 (SerA53), ThrA59 (GlnA65), LysA61 (A67), GluA63 (GlnA69), TyrA85 (A89), AsnA87 (AspA91), ValB29 (B32), ThrB45 (B49), SerB47 (B51), ArgB49 (SerB53), SerB51 (not included in Qβ), SerB52 (B56), AsnB55 (B61), LysB57 (B63), ThrB59(GlnB65) and LysB61 (B67). Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)

Figure 9 Correlation coefficients at each 50th cycle of phase refinement at the phase extension from 10–4.5 å resolution, starting with the MS2 model at the correct radius. The upper curve shows the correlation coefficient after phase refinement at 3.5 å resolution starting with the Qβ model. Structure 1996 4, 543-554DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00060-3)