Chapter 11: Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engineering Economy Practice Problems
Advertisements

Chapter 6 Annual Cash Flow Analysis
13-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 13 Breakeven and Payback Analysis © 2012 by McGraw-Hill.
Evaluating Business and Engineering Assets Payback Period.
APPLICATIONS OF MONEY-TIME RELATIONSHIPS
Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fourteenth Edition By William.
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fifteenth Edition By William.
Chapter 7 - Rate of Return Analysis Click here for Streaming Audio To Accompany Presentation (optional) Click here for Streaming Audio To Accompany Presentation.
Calculate Point of Indifference Between Two Cost Scenarios
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 14 Project Risk and Uncertainty Origin of Project Risk Methods of Describing Project Risk.
1 MER 439 Design of Thermal Fluid Systems Engineering Economics 3. Comparing Alternatives Professor Wilk Winter 2007.
Dealing With Uncertainty
Engineering Economics in Canada
Chapter 15 Replacement Decisions
Finanças October 24. Topics covered  Decision trees  Sensitivity analysis  Breakeven analysis.
Chapter 10 Sensitivity and Breakeven Analysis. Handling Project Uncertainty Origin of Project Risk Methods of Describing Project Risk.
FINAL EXAM REVIEW Spring Nominal and Effective Interest Rates Payment Period  Compounding Period Mortgages and Car Loans MARR and WACC Present.
Chapter 7 Rate of Return Analysis
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fifteenth Edition By William.
Engineering Economy Why is Engineering Economy important? Practical everyday questions –Should you finance your car or pay cash? Finance for $6995 –vs-
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 1-1 Developed.
Risk Analysis, Real Options, and Capital Budgeting
Capital Budgeting Decisions
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fifteenth Edition By William.
The second objective today is to evaluate correctly capital investment alternatives when the time value of money is a key influence.
Evaluating a Single Project
CHAPTER 10 DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY. RISK Risk and uncertainty are similar in that they both present the problem of not knowing what future conditions.
Break-Even Analysis Break-even Analysis – performed to determine the value of a variable that makes two elements equal. In economic terms: determining.
L29: Sensitivity and Breakeven Analysis ECON 320 Engineering Economics Mahmut Ali GOKCE Industrial Systems Engineering Computer.
Copyright ©2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Sixteenth Edition By William.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Blank & Tarquin: 5 th edition. Ch.13 Authored by Dr. Don Smith,
1 Word Problems Organize the Data Given: Determine the objective and your strategy. Draw the Cash Flow Diagram. Write Equations and Solve. Reflect Back.
Ch 10-1 © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ Ostwald and McLaren / Cost Analysis and Estimating.
Project cash flow n A B Example 1: Consider the following two mutually exclusive investment projects. Assume.
EGR Break-Even Analysis Break-even Analysis – performed to determine the value of a variable that makes two elements equal. In economic terms:
EGR Break-Even Analysis Break-even Analysis – performed to determine the value of a variable that makes two elements equal. In economic terms:
Chapter 6 Annual Equivalent Worth Criterion. Chapter 6 Annual Equivalence Analysis  Annual equivalent criterion  Applying annual worth analysis  Mutually.
Dealing with Uncertainty Assessing a Project’s Worth under Uncertainty or Risk.
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
APPLICATIONS OF MONEY-TIME RELATIONSHIPS
Chapter 4: The Time Value of Money
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
TM 661 Chapter 5 Solutions 1 5.4) Consider the net cash flows and salvage values for each of alternatives 1 and 2 having lives 3 and 5 years respectively.
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Adopted and modified by Dr. W-.W. Li of UTEP, Fall, 2003
Meaning and Measure of Inflation
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 4: The Time Value of Money
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Chapter 9: Replacement Analysis
CHAPTER 8 Personal Finance.
Chapter 4: The Time Value of Money
Contemporary Engineering Economics
Engineering Economic Analysis
CHAPTER 8 Personal Finance.
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 4: The Time Value of Money
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 11: Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis Engineering Economy Chapter 11: Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

The objective of Chapter 11 is to illustrate breakeven and sensitivity methods for investigating variability in outcomes of engineering projects.

To this point we have assumed a high degree of confidence in estimated values. The degree of confidence is sometimes called assumed certainty, and decisions made on the basis of this kind of analysis are called decisions under certainty. In virtually all situations, ultimate economic results are unknown. Breakeven and sensitivity analysis are used to help understand how our decision might be affected if our original estimates are incorrect.

The breakeven point is the value of a key factor at which we are indifferent between two alternatives (one may be “do nothing”). The breakeven point is the value of y where

Common factors to consider for breakeven analysis. annual revenue and expenses rate of return market (or salvage) value equipment life capacity utilization

Should Jim sell his gas-guzzler? Jim's 1998 minivan is quite functional, but it only averages 20 miles per gallon (mpg). He has found a somewhat newer vehicle (roughly the same functionality) that averages 26 mpg. He can sell his current minivan for $2800 and purchase the newer vehicle for $4,000. Assume a cost of gasoline $4.00 per gallon. How many miles per year must Jim drive if he wants to recover his investment in three years? Assume an interest rate of 6%, zero salvage value for either vehicle after three years, and identical maintenance cost.

Gas-guzzler solution Current minivan New vehicle Equating these, and solving for x, we find PW1 = PW2  (P/A, 6%,3) = 2.6730

Pause and solve The “one time good deal” Cash-For-Clunkers program offered by the federal government proved a temporary boon for car dealers. In addition to this program, dealers were eager to add their own incentives. Bill Mitselfik was considering two different deals he could make for his new car. He can finance the purchase price, $25,000, entirely through the dealer at a 1.8% APR (compounded monthly) for 5 years, with payments monthly. Alternatively, the dealer will give Bill a cash rebate and provide financing at 9% APR (compounded monthly) for 5 years, with monthly payments. What is the value of the rebate for which Bill would be indifferent between the two financing options?

Solution APR=1.8% Monthly Interest Rate = 1.8% / 12 = 0.15% APR=9% Let the rate of the rebate = x We have to equal the AW of these two alternatives. 25,000 (A/P, 0.15%, 60) = 25000*x (A/P, 0.75%, 60) X=0.084 The value of the rebate = 25000*(1-0.084) = $22,900

We use sensitivity analysis to see what happens to project profitability when the estimated value of study factors are changed. What if expenses are 10% higher than expected—is the project profitable? What if sales revenue is 15% lower than expected? What change in either expenses or revenues will cause the project to be unprofitable (decision reversal)?

Reconsidering Jim's gas-guzzler. Considering that Jim drives about 10,000 miles per year, our previous analysis would indicate that he should purchase the vehicle that gets better mileage. However, what if gas prices drop by 10%? Should Jim still sell his gas-guzzling minivan? $4  $3.6 So, if gas prices drop by 10%, Jim should keep his minivan.

Pause and solve Acme Delivery is considering a proposal for new package tracking technology. The system has an estimated initial cost of $1.9 million and will require upgrades and maintenance of $140,000 each year. Acme estimates that improved tracking will save approximately $680,000 per year, after system operating expenses. Acme has a MARR of 15% per year, and the study period for this technology is 6 years, after which time Acme expects the entire system will need to be replaced. The PW of this proposal is PW(15%) = -$1,900,000+($680,000 - $140,000)(P/A,15%,6) = $143,630 Determine how sensitive the decision to invest in the system is to the estimates of initial investment cost and annual savings.

Spreadsheets are very useful in performing sensitivity analysis. Formulas easily reflect changes in parameter values. Tables and plots can provide quick answers and visual cues to the effect of changes. A spider plot can be especially useful in sensitivity studies. It can be useful to examine more than one alternative on a plot, or to examine sensitivity of incremental cash flows.

[Note that the steeper the curve, the more sensitive is the PW to the factor.]

Changing the value of more than one factor at a time. To this point we have only looked at changes in one factor at a time. In reality, each factor considered can change, so it is useful to look at the effect of simultaneous changes in factors of interest. One way to accomplish this is to use the Optimistic-Most Likely-Pessimistic (O-ML-P) technique.

Optimistic-Most Likely-Pessimistic Establish optimistic (the most favorable), most likely, and pessimistic (the least favorable) estimates for each factor. The optimistic condition, which should occur about 1 time out of twenty, is when all factors are at their optimistic levels. Similarly for pessimistic condition. (Optimistic 1/20 v pessimistic 1/20) The most likely condition should occur roughly 18 times out of 20. (Most likely 18/20) Perform EW (*equivalent worth) calculations under each condition for insight into the sensitivity of the solution. The results can be seen on a spider plot for further insight.

Consider investment in a new crane. Assume a MARR of 8%. Estimation Condition Optimistic (O) Most Likely (M) Pessimistic (P) Investment, I $240,000 $270,000 $340,000 Useful life, N 10 yr 8 yr 5 yr Market value, MV $20,000 $15,000 $8,000 Annual revenues, R $100,000 $80,000 $50,000 Annual expenses, E $10,000

Considering O-ML-P for I and R (fix E, MV, and life at their ML levels). Value in each cell is the PW for the project. Investment, I Revenues, R Optimistic (O) Most Likely (M) Pessimistic (P) Optimistic, (O) $256,568 $226,568 $156,568 Most Likely, (M) $141,636 $111,636 $41,636 Pessimistic, (P) -$30,764 -$60,764 -$130,764 This suggests that perhaps some additional effort should be place on getting refined estimates of revenues. Of course, the complete study needs to consider the other factors.