Silke Kloppholz, Hannah Kuhn, Natalia Requena  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potassium Transporter KUP7 Is Involved in K+ Acquisition and Translocation in Arabidopsis Root under K+-Limited Conditions  Min Han, Wei Wu, Wei-Hua Wu,
Advertisements

Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Kong Lingfang , Wu Jianxiang , Lu Lina , Xu Yi , Zhou Xueping  
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Spatial Auxin Signaling Controls Leaf Flattening in Arabidopsis
Silke Kloppholz, Hannah Kuhn, Natalia Requena  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
A Feedback Mechanism Controlling SCRAMBLED Receptor Accumulation and Cell- Type Pattern in Arabidopsis  Su-Hwan Kwak, John Schiefelbein  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages (October 2015)
Annexin5 Is Essential for Pollen Development in Arabidopsis
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 23, Pages (December 2012)
Synaptotagmin SYTA Forms ER-Plasma Membrane Junctions that Are Recruited to Plasmodesmata for Plant Virus Movement  Amit Levy, Judy Y. Zheng, Sondra G.
Xianfeng Morgan Xu, Tea Meulia, Iris Meier  Current Biology 
EXO70I Is Required for Development of a Sub-domain of the Periarbuscular Membrane during Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis  Xinchun Zhang, Nathan Pumplin,
Kim Min Jung , Ciani Silvano , Schachtman Daniel P.   Molecular Plant 
Potassium Transporter KUP7 Is Involved in K+ Acquisition and Translocation in Arabidopsis Root under K+-Limited Conditions  Min Han, Wei Wu, Wei-Hua Wu,
Overcoming Hybridization Barriers by the Secretion of the Maize Pollen Tube Attractant ZmEA1 from Arabidopsis Ovules  Mihaela L. Márton, Astrid Fastner,
Stuart A. Casson, Alistair M. Hetherington  Current Biology 
EXO70I Is Required for Development of a Sub-domain of the Periarbuscular Membrane during Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis  Xinchun Zhang, Nathan Pumplin,
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Inducible Antibacterial Defense System in C. elegans
Volume 22, Issue 23, Pages (December 2012)
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
The WUSCHEL Related Homeobox Protein WOX7 Regulates the Sugar Response of Lateral Root Development in Arabidopsis thaliana  Danyu Kong, Yueling Hao, Hongchang.
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Adi Zaltsman, Alexander Krichevsky, Abraham Loyter, Vitaly Citovsky 
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 20, Pages (October 2005)
Kristoffer Palma, Yuelin Zhang, Xin Li  Current Biology 
Cleavage of the SYMBIOSIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE Ectodomain Promotes Complex Formation with Nod Factor Receptor 5  Meritxell Antolín-Llovera, Martina K.
A Novel Class of MYB Factors Controls Sperm-Cell Formation in Plants
Marco Trujillo, Kazuya Ichimura, Catarina Casais, Ken Shirasu 
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor AtTCP15 Regulates Endoreduplication by Modulating Expression of Key Cell-cycle Genes  Li Zi-Yu , Li Bin , Dong Ai-Wu.
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
AtABCG29 Is a Monolignol Transporter Involved in Lignin Biosynthesis
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (May 2005)
A ROP GTPase Signaling Pathway Controls Cortical Microtubule Ordering and Cell Expansion in Arabidopsis  Ying Fu, Tongda Xu, Lei Zhu, Mingzhang Wen, Zhenbiao.
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Uma B. Karadge, Minja Gosto, Matthew L. Nicotra  Current Biology 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
Taro Ohkawa, Matthew D. Welch  Current Biology 
Agrobacterium Delivers Anchorage Protein VirE3 for Companion VirE2 to Aggregate at Host Entry Sites for T-DNA Protection  Xiaoyang Li, Haitao Tu, Shen.
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019)
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Presentation transcript:

A Secreted Fungal Effector of Glomus intraradices Promotes Symbiotic Biotrophy  Silke Kloppholz, Hannah Kuhn, Natalia Requena  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 14, Pages 1204-1209 (July 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.044 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2011 21, 1204-1209DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.044) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The SP7 Family of Small Secreted Proteins (A) Domain structure of the SP7 protein family, consisting of a signal peptide (SP, red), a conserved region of unknown function (yellow), a nuclear localization signal (NLS, green), and a series of hydrophilic tandem repeats (blue). (B) ClustalW alignment of the amino acid sequences of SP7, SP31, and SP14 as found in the secretion library. The SP, the conserved region of unknown function, and the NLS are indicated with red, yellow, and green bars, respectively. (C) Repeat organization of different SP7 cDNA varieties. Repeat subunits with similar sequence are represented in the same colors. Asterisks indicate repeat subunits of reduced length. (D) Transcript accumulation of SP7 in fungal tissues and infected roots. Expression data in germinated spores or extraradical mycelium (ERM) noninduced or induced by coincubation with roots and in mycorrhizal roots 12 or 25 days postinfection (dpi) are given relative to GiTEF. Error bars represent standard deviations of three biological replicates. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 versus expression in spores. (E) Analysis of SP7 varieties in different developmental stages. SP7 varieties were amplified from total cDNA using primers located in the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions common to all SP7 mRNAs. PCR products were blotted and detected using the SP7 variety 0.9 kb as a probe. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2011 21, 1204-1209DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.044) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 SP7 Localizes to the Nucleus (A) Nuclear localization of SP7 minus signal peptide (SP7ΔSP-GFP) in a germinated conidium of Aspergillus nidulans expressed under derepressing (glycerol) conditions and examined by epifluorescence microscopy. The picture is the overlay of the bright-field and the GFP channel. SP7 was exclusively localized in nuclei. (B) Single confocal plane of a representative transgenic Medicago truncatula hairy root line constitutively expressing SP7-GFP. The fusion protein localizes to the nucleus of cortical root cells. (C) In contrast, constitutive DsRed1 as a control in the same root as in (B) localized to the nucleus and the cytoplasm. (D) Single confocal plane of a representative Nicotiana benthamiana leaf expressing SP7-GFP. Leaves were observed 3 days after infiltration with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. SP7 was visible in the plant nucleus, in small vesicles located in the cytoplasm, and in the vicinity of the plasma membrane (showed by a dashed line in F). (E) Control DsRed1 fluorescence in the same cell as in (D) was only observed in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm, but not in vesicles. (F) Overlay of (D) and (E). Scale bars represent 10 μm. Filled arrowheads indicate nuclei; empty arrowheads indicate vesicles; dashed lines indicate plasma membrane. See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2011 21, 1204-1209DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.044) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 SP7 Counteracts the ERF19 Defense Response and Enhances Mycorrhizal Colonization (A) Time-course analysis of MtERF19 expression in mycorrhizal roots 1, 12, and 25 days postinoculation (dpi) with Glomus intraradices. (B) Analysis of MtERF19 expression after infection of stably transformed M. truncatula hairy root lines with Colletotrichum trifolii. VC indicates vector control line. Significance is versus the uninfected control. (C) Transcript accumulation of MtERF19 after 24 hr induction of M. truncatula roots with crude extracts of spores of different fungi, including G. intraradices. Significance is versus the noninoculated control. (D) Estimations of mycorrhization levels in SP7ΔSP-GFP and SP7-GFP hairy root lines in comparison to a control line (VC) 12 dpi with G. intraradices. Parameters measured are frequency (F%) and intensity (M%) of mycorrhiza and abundance of intraradical hyphae (I%), arbuscule (A%) and appressoria (App%). The data are the average of three biological replicates of one representative line expressing SP7ΔSP-GFP or SP7-GFP. Significance is versus mycorrhization parameters of the line transformed with the vector control. (E) Analysis of MtERF19 expression after infection of stably transformed M. truncatula hairy root lines with C. trifolii. Vector control line and SP7ΔSP-GFP- and SP7-GFP-expressing lines are compared. Significance is versus the infected vector control. (F) Transcript accumulation of MtPR10-1 after infection of stably transformed M. truncatula hairy root lines with C. trifolii. Vector control line and SP7ΔSP-GFP- and SP7-GFP-expressing lines are compared. Significance is versus the infected vector control. (G) Estimation of mycorrhization level of a M. truncatula MtERF19-RNAi line compared to a control line 12 dpi with G. intraradices. Data are the average of three biological replicates of the line ERF19-RNAi2. Significance is versus mycorrhization parameters of the line expressing the vector control. (H) Estimations of mycorrhization levels 12 dpi with G. intraradices in transgenic M. truncatula hairy root lines expressing MtERF19 under control of the CMV 35S promoter. Data are the average of three biological replicates of the line ERF19-OE6. All data are the average of three biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2011 21, 1204-1209DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.044) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Biological Relevance of SP7 (A) SP7-mRFP is secreted by a Magnaporthe oryzae GFP-expressing strain, translocated into the onion cell, and localized to the nucleus (left and middle panels). No red nuclei were detected when the infection assay was performed using the GFP control strain (Guy11-GFP, right panel). Images show maximal projections of several confocal planes. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (B) Rice roots 10 days postinoculation with SP7-mRFP-expressing M. oryzae strains (Guy11-GFP/SP7-mRFP) show reduced root decay symptoms and no shortening of lateral roots in comparison to roots infected with the control Guy11-GFP strain. Three biological replicates with four plants each were used. One representative biological replicate of each treatment is shown. (C) PR10a and PR10b transcript accumulation in rice roots 4 and 10 days postinfection with M. oryzae. Strains expressing SP7 (Guy11-SP7) show a reduced induction compared to colonization by the control strain (Guy11). Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates. ∗∗p < 0.01 versus PR10 levels induced by wild-type Guy11 strain. See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2011 21, 1204-1209DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.044) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions