Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
The Nuclear Hat1p/Hat2p Complex
Daniel Wolf, Stephen P. Goff  Cell 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Regulation of the Pap Epigenetic Switch by CpxAR
Lcd1p Recruits Mec1p to DNA Lesions In Vitro and In Vivo
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
ChIC and ChEC Molecular Cell
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Antonin Morillon, Nickoletta Karabetsou, Anitha Nair, Jane Mellor 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
Young-Hee Cho, Sang-Dong Yoo, Jen Sheen  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Ordered Recruitment of Transcription and Chromatin Remodeling Factors to a Cell Cycle– and Developmentally Regulated Promoter  Maria Pia Cosma, Tomoyuki.
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Helena Santos-Rosa, Robert Schneider, Bradley E
Andrew Emili, David M Schieltz, John R Yates, Leland H Hartwell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Flora Ambre Honoré, Vincent Méjean, Olivier Genest  Cell Reports 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Christopher J. Nelson, Helena Santos-Rosa, Tony Kouzarides  Cell 
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Sebastian Rumpf, Stefan Jentsch  Molecular Cell 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Histone H2A.Z Regulates Transcription and Is Partially Redundant with Nucleosome Remodeling Complexes  Maria Soledad Santisteban, Tatyana Kalashnikova,
Pantelis Hatzis, Iannis Talianidis  Molecular Cell 
Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and SEN1 genes in rpb4Δ and isogenic wild type cells. (A) Schematic ... Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and.
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (January 1996)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 1325-1332 (November 2003) Methylation of Histone H3 K4 Mediates Association of the Isw1p ATPase with Chromatin  Helena Santos-Rosa, Robert Schneider, Bradley E. Bernstein, Nickoletta Karabetsou, Antonin Morillon, Christoph Weise, Stuart L. Schreiber, Jane Mellor, Tony Kouzarides  Molecular Cell  Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 1325-1332 (November 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00438-6

Figure 1 hSNF2H and Isw1p Are Binding to Methylated K4 H3 (A) H3 tail peptides un-, di-, or trimethylated on K4 were coupled to Sulfolink beads and used as affinity columns for hSNF2H. hSNF2H was detected by Western blot. 20% of the input nuclear extract was loaded. (B) Protein extracts from an Isw1-myc and a Chd1p-myc yeast strain were prepared and affinity purifications were performed as in (A). Recombinantly expressed Gcn5-His bromodomain was used as binding control. Bound proteins were detected by Western blot. 25% of the input yeast extract and 10% of the recombinant Gcn5 input was loaded. (C) Isw1-myc was immunoprecipitated from wt and set1Δ extracts, and the precipitate was probed in a Western assay with an H3-specific antibody. 5% of the Input yeast extract was loaded. (D) As in (C), but mono-me K4, di-me K4, or tri-me K4 specific antibodies were used, to detect the methylation state of H3 associated with Isw1p. 5% of the Input was loaded. (E) Di-me and tri-me K4 peptides can elute Isw1-myc from a crude chromatin fraction. Eluted Isw1p-myc was detected by Western blot. (F) Purified Flag-Isw1p monomer was used in pull-down assays. No binding to di- or trimethylated K4 H3 peptide is detectable. Addition of protein extract (lanes 3 and 5) prepared from an isw1Δ strain restores the binding to methylated K4 H3 peptide. 50% of the Input was loaded. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1325-1332DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00438-6)

Figure 2 Isw1p Association with Chromatin Depends on Set1p (A and B) SET1 dependency for the association of Isw1p with chromatin. Isogenic wt and set1Δ strains expressing Isw1-myc were crosslinked and the chromatin prepared was precipitated with anti-myc antibody and analyzed by quantitative PCR. “Isw1p and Set1p dependent genes” (A) are genes whose transcription levels are downregulated in ISW1 and SET1 deleted strains, as obtained from microarray analysis. “Isw1p dependent genes” (B) are genes whose transcription levels are downregulated in ISW1 but not in SET1 deleted strains, as obtained from microarray analysis. Relative fluorescence units are calculated as described in Experimental Procedures. (C and D) Chromatin from wt-1 and isogenic set1Δ, wt and isogenic set1N1016Q mutant (set1Δ complemented with wt SET1, set1 N1016Q, and set1 C1068A alleles on plasmids), wt-2 and isogenic H3K4A mutant strains, expressing Isw1-myc, was immunoprecipitated with anti-myc antibody and analyzed for the presence of Isw1p with primers from within the MPP10 coding region. (D) As in (C) but analyzed with primers from within the YOL106 coding region. In each panel the region amplified by PCR is underlined. Input, 1:50 diluted input chromatin; No ab, no antibody control; α-myc, anti-myc antibody. (E and F) Isw1p and trimethylated K4 H3 distribution within coding regions of Isw1p- and Set1p-dependent genes. (E) Isw1p and trimethylated K4H3 distribution within MPP10 ORF. (F) Isw1p and trimethylated K4H3 distribution within YOL106 ORF. Primers at the 5′ (ATG region) are marked in red and at the 3′ end of the gene in green. The diagrams represent relative fluorescence units (IP/input). Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1325-1332DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00438-6)

Figure 3 Set1p and Isw1p Regulate Common Processes In Vivo (A) Growth properties of a set1Δ isw1Δ strain complemented with plasmids harboring SET1 and ISW1 wt alleles, SET1 wt and isw1K227R mutant, set1N1016Q mutant and ISW1 wt, or isw1K227R set1N1016Q mutants (upper panel) and isogenic wt, dot1Δ, and set1N1016Q (lower panel). Culture serial dilutions were spotted to minimal complete medium (SDC), and minimal medium lacking methionine (SDC-met). Plates were incubated for 3 days at 30°C. (B) MET16 poly(A)+ mRNA level is downregulated in isw1K227R mutant as determined by Northern analysis. Poly(A)+ mRNA was prepared from wt, isw1Δ, and isw1K227R strains grown in the absence of methionine (SDC−met). (C) Upper: Schematic representation of MET16 nucleosome position as obtained from micrococcal nuclease (MNase) accessibility. The numbers between nucleosomes correspond to cleavage sites relative to the mRNA start site at (+1), which is (−60) with respect to the ATG. Lower: Isogenic wt and set1Δ strains, expressing Isw1-myc, were grown in SDC-methionine. The crosslinked chromatin was precipitated with anti-myc antibodies and analyzed by quantitative PCR with the primers to nucleosome +1 (92/253). (D) Set1p- and Isw1p-dependent change in micrococcal nuclease (MNase) accessibility in yeast chromatin at the MET16 locus mapped by indirect end label analysis. DNA was subject to digestion with EcoRI and a Southern blot of DNA hybridized to an EcoRI (+796)/Msc1 (+472) fragment is shown (probe). The position of the Set1p- and Isw1p-dependent structures is marked with asterisks. Lane 1 shows wt chromatin prepared in SDC+methionine; lanes 2–4 show wt, isw1K227R, and set1C1068A chromatin prepared in minimal medium SDC−methionine. All lines show chromatin in permeabilized cells digested with 150 units/ml MNase. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1325-1332DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00438-6)

Figure 4 RNAPII and Rna15p Recruitment and Distribution Are Altered in a set1 N1016Q Mutant Cells with the genotypes indicated were grown overnight in minimal medium lacking methionine (SDC−met), and crosslinked chromatin was precipitated with antibodies specific to RNAPII (A); Rna15p (B) and DNA were detected using real-time PCR to amplify regions corresponding to nucleosomes +1 and + 5 at MET16. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1325-1332DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00438-6)