Med Phys 3A03/3AB2 Practical Health & Medical Physics Communications D.R. Chettle, with D.F. Moscu TA: Helen Moise.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Claudia Landman and Wolfgang Raskob
Advertisements

TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Copyright©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Chemistry Properties of Solutions.
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
/4/2010 Box and Whisker Plots Objective: Learn how to read and draw box and whisker plots Starter: Order these numbers.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
1. Name the particles in the atom and give the charges associated with each.
THE EXTERNAL HAZARD.
Radiation in the Environment
Sources of Radiation in the Environment Ground Zero (New Mexico)
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
Module IV - Dose terms and units
Radiological Assessment March 29, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems totaled more than 130 hours of flying – Flight operations were.
Radiation Can Be Fun….!!!! But R.E.S.P.E.C.T. it
4/2003 Rev 2 I.3.6 – slide 1 of 23 Session I.3.6 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 3Interaction of Radiation with Matter Session 6Buildup and Shielding.
RPT-111 Course Overview. Course Grading – Weighted Average – Mid-Term Exam – 30% – Final Exam – 40% – Course Project – 20% – Attendance – 10%
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
1. 2 No lecture on Wed February 8th Thursday 9 th Feb 14: :00 Thursday 9 th Feb 14: :00.
Risk and Return Learning Module.
Radiation Protection Course
Polonium!!!. The London Po-210 Poisoning Case: What we know and what we don’t know May 15, 2008 CAPT Michael A. Noska, USPHS Senior Health Physicist U.S.
EPR-Public Communications L-02 Communicating Basics of Radiation.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Risk, Return, and the Capital Asset Pricing Model
3/2003 Rev 1 I – slide 1 of 20 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 3Interaction of Radiation with Matter Sessions 1-2Heavy Particles Session I
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Bell Schedules Club Time is available from 8:05-8:20  1 st 8:20 – 9:15  2 nd 9:20 – 10:10  3 rd 10:15 – 11:05  4 th 11:10 – 12:50 A(11:10)
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
PSSA Preparation.
Chapter 30 Nuclear Physics.
Radiological Safety and Response
International Atomic Energy Agency ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES Interpretation of Measurement Results.
International Atomic Energy Agency Criteria for the Need for Monitoring ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES.
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
MIRD Pamphlet No. 21: A Generalized Schema for Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry—Standardization of Nomenclature 5/15/2009.
IAEA Quantities and Measurements - 3 Radiation Protection Quantities Day 3 – Lecture 1 1.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 630 Effective and Committed Effective Dose Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Supernova remnants Supernova remnants. Man is exposed to different kind of natural occurring radiation. That includes radiation from outer space as well.
A Radiation Primer radiation … radioactive material What are they? exposure … contamination Are they the same?
Radon Awareness Dr Julian MacDonald Radiation Protection Adviser Medical Physics Department.
Radiation Protection Technology Dose Limits Radiological Safety and Response RPT
Higher Physics – Unit 3 3.5Dosimetry and Safety. Activity of Radiation The activity of a radioactive source is the average number of nuclei decaying per.
Radiophamaceuticals in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging Vasken Dilsizian, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Radiology Director of Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine and.
Med Phys 3A03/3AA1 Practical Health & Medical Physics Communications D.R. Chettle, with D.F. Moscu TA: Helen Moise.
Internal Radiation Dosimetry Lab 9. Radiation Measurement We use different terms depending on whether: 1.The radiation is coming from a radioactive source.
Health Physics 1a: Sources of Radiation. Introduction Scientists have studied radiation for over 100 years and we know a great deal about it. Radiation.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
IB Assessment Statements  I.3.1.State the meaning of the terms exposure, abosorbed dose, quality factor (relative biological effectiveness) and dose.
Med Phys 3A03/3AA1 Practical Health & Medical Physics Communications D.R. Chettle, with D.F. Moscu TA: Helen Moise.
CHEMISTRY 1000 Topic #1: Atomic Structure and Nuclear Chemistry Fall 2013 Dr. Tracey Roemmele.
ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO INTAKE OF RADIONUCLIDES
06/02/2016radiation safety - level 51 Radiation safety level 5 Frits Pleiter.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
Higher Physics Radiation Dosimetry.
1 OBJ 2 Internal and External Exposure Control RPT
Yair Grof.  Ph.D in Nuclear Physics – LANL, USA  – Head, dosimetry department, NRC – SOREQ  – Sabbatical at NMSU, USA  2009 –
Dosimetry & Safety. Activity The term 'Activity' of a source describes the (in)stability of the atoms within a substance. One atom decaying per second.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Lecture 5 – Internal dose assessment and interpretation of measurement results Postgraduate Educational Course.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PART V: ASSESSMENT OF EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL EXPOSURES (OTHER THAN MEDICAL) Module V.1 - Assessment of occupational.
Louisiana State University Radiation Safety Office
Radiological Analysis of Ground Water
Natural activity and inhalation problems Wim Erkens (Thermphos)
ADEQUACY OF EXISTING AEROSOL SAMPLERS FOR MONITORING NORM EXPOSURES European ALARA Network 9th Workshop on Occupational Exposure to Natural Radiation.
Please read this before using presentation
Presentation transcript:

Med Phys 3A03/3AB2 Practical Health & Medical Physics Communications D.R. Chettle, with D.F. Moscu TA: Helen Moise

Course is in transition from: Communications in Medical Physics to: Operational Health Physics Laboratory

6 subsidiary objectives, or modules, each taking 4 weeks (so 3 per term). So: Mon Jan 7 th Air sampling for radioactivity using high volume air samplers Mon Jan 14 th practical Mon Jan 21 st practical Mon Jan 28 th report back

Scheduling It might work better to have: Mon Jan 7 th 13:30 – 14:20 Air sampling for radioactivity using high volume air samplers Mon Jan 14 th 13:30 – 15:20 practical group A Mon Jan 21 st 13:30 – 15:20 practical group B Mon Jan 28 th 13:30 – 14:20 report back Would this be possible?

Modules 5 & 6 Estimating doses & dosimetry lecture: Monday Feb 4 th, 13:30 – 14:20 labs: Mondays Feb 11 th & 25 th, 13:30 – 15:20 report back: Monday Mar 4 th, 13:30 – 14:20 (Feb 18 th – 22 nd Reading week) Radiological incident response lecture: Monday Mar 11 th, 13:30 – 14:20 labs: Mondays Mar 11 th & 25 th, 13:30 – 15:20 report back: Monday Apr 1 st, 13:30 – 14:20

Evaluation Practical performance35 – 45% Report communication35 – 45% Self-assessment 5 – 10% Peer assessment 5 – 10% Participation 10%

Why is radioactivity in the air an issue? Contamination: it drops out of the air onto surfaces External exposure: walking through a radioactive cloud Internal exposure: breathe it in and it decays inside the body

How does radioactivity get into the air? Gaseous or volatile compound: eg 125 I, 3 H, 222 Rn Powders or particulates released as aerosol: eg 137 Cs Nature of facility: eg 41 Ar from 40 Ar(n,γ) 41 Ar in Reactor

Air sampling vs Monitoring Sampling to establish whether or not there is an issue Monitor continuously, repeatedly or periodically, when there is an established situation, which must be kept under control

Air sampling method Use a (vacuum) pump to draw a known volume of air through a filter and/or a cartridge. – Filter will trap particles above a specified diameter – Cartridge (eg charcoal, ion exchange, or similar) will trap materials depending on their binding properties Measure activity on filter or cartridge

How to interpret measured activity Compare measured activity to DAC & ALI ? Derived Air Concentration ? Annual Limit on Intake ?

Go back to the start Set a limit on the dose that can be allowed For Nuclear Energy Workers, this is 100 mSv over a 5 year period, or 20 mSv per year (0.020 Sv/y) For members of the general public this is 20 times less, that is Sv/y

Calculating a dose Use committed dose – attribute the eventual dose to the year in which the person was exposed Use (equivalent &) effective dose – take type of radiation and organ/part of body exposed into account So, use the committed effective dose

Committed dose D(50) = A s (1-e -λEτ )Σ(AFxYxE) Mxλ E Where D(50) is the committed absorbed dose A s is the source activity λ E is the effective elimination rate τ is 50 years AF is the absorbed fraction Y is the branching ratio, or yield E is the energy of an emission M is the target mass

Simplification Take D(50) forward using radiation weighting factors (w R ) to get equivalent dose and tissue weighting factors (w T ) to get effective dose, so have E(50) Then get this E(50) per unit activity, which is termed the effective dose coefficient e(50) – This e(50) will be small, because it is the committed effective dose in sievert per bequerel.

Back to ALI Annual limit of intake (ALI) for nuclear energy workers is therefore: 0.020[Sv]/e(50)[Sv/Bq] = [Bq] Example: 125 I inhalation, 5 m particles, e(50) = 7.3x10 -9, so ALI = 0.020/7.3x10 -9 = 2.74x10 6 Bq

DAC again Derived air concentration (DAC) is the activity per unit volume that a nuclear energy worker can breathe throughout the working year and not exceed the ALI and therefore not exceed the Sv; units Bq/m 3 A reference person is assumed to breathe 20 litre of air per minute, that is m 3 /minute If (s)he works 2000 hours per year, then (s)he breathes 0.020x60x2000 = 2400 m 3 air per year So DAC[Bq/m 3 ] = ALI[Bq]/2400[m 3 ] For 125 I, 5 m inhaled, DAC = 2.74x10 6 /2400 = 1140[Bq/m 3 ]

Not that simple Limit on committed effective dose is lower (0.001 Sv) for general public than for nuclear energy workers (0.020 Sv) Annual limit of intake (ALI) varies between ingested and inhaled and, for inhaled, it varies with particle size (For 125 I, e(50) inhaled is 7.3x10 -9 Sv/Bq for 5 m, but 5.3x10 -9 Sv/Bq for 1 m particles and e(50) ingested is 1.5x10 -8 Sv/Bq.) Does a person really inhale 20 litres of air per minute regardless of whether her/his work is strenuous or sedentary? Is 2000 hours per year truly typical?