Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fashion Boutique v. Fendi USA The case of improper evidence supporting plaintiffs claims and their subsequent appeal of District Courts decision.
Advertisements

EOC Judicial – Systems / Structures
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Some Horizontal “Rule of Reason” Special Factors “Rule of Reason” analysis essential in select cases. Complete.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller Cross BUSINESS.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Chapter 46 Antitrust Law.
1 COPYRIGHT © 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and West Legal Studies in Business are trademarks.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Scenario 1: Basic Facts Year: 1893 Location: Cleveland, Ohio Two major cement contractors – Smith and Jones.
The Sick Chicken Case Schechter vs. U.S.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act of 1982 (FTAIA) General Rule: Sherman 1-7 not apply to “conduct.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Lorain Journal Co. v. United States (1951) Basic Facts: Defendant, controller newspaper and radio station.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake National Society of Prof. Engineers v. U.S. (1978) Base Facts: National Association of Engineers precluded.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Standard Oil Co. of California v. U.S. (1949) Basic Facts: Justice Department challenged Standard Oil contracts.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Verizon v. Law Office of Curtis Tinker (2004) Basic Facts: Tinker, New York lawyer and AT&T customer, sued.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Med South: FTC 2002 Advisory Opinion Basic Facts: Med South is for-profit entity formed by a large group.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake The Big Powerful “Innocent” Oligopoly The situation: 1.Market has few players, all successful. A “Shared.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co. (Sup. Ct. 1967) What had happened to Schwinn’s market share? Three.
Chapter 47 Antitrust Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pearson Education, Inc., Longman © District Courts.
Chapter 9 Contracts—Nature and Terminology
Judicial Process How does a case get to the Supreme Court?
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Brooke Group LTD v Williamson Tobacco (1993) Basic Facts: For 18 months, Brown Williams Tobacco (B&W) wages.
1 What is antitrust/competition law? What is its purpose?
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Competitor Foreclosure Arrangements 1.Tying Cases – To get this, you must buy that. 1.Exclusive dealing.
 Features of a Market. Such as:  Ease of entry into the market  Low barriers to entry  Number of buyers/sellers  Forms of competition.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
 “Market power” is the power of company to control the market for its product.  The law does allow for market monopolies when a patent is issued. During.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake National Society of Prof. Engineers v. U.S. (1978) Base Facts: National Association of Engineers precluded.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake National Society of Prof. Engineers v. U.S. (1978) Base Facts: National Association of Engineers precluded.
1 Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases From notes by Steve Baron © Ed Lamoureux/Steve Baron.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Hospital Corp of America v. FTC (7 th Cir. 1987) Basic Facts: Hospital Corp, owner of one hospital in Chattanooga,
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Verizon v. Law Office of Curtis Tinker (2004) Basic Facts: Tinker, New York lawyer and AT&T customer, sued.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde (Sup. Ct. 1984) Basic Facts: Exclusive contract between hospital.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Cartel Per Se Analytical Process Suspect category (price, boycott, market division)? Rule of Reason - Market.
1 The basic notion of any discussion of legal issues in marketing: You probably need legal advice before implementing any marketing plan Before marketing.
Medicines and the Poor: What Role for Competition Law & Policy? Mariana Tavares de Araujo Competition Department, Head SDE, Ministry of Justice, Brazil.
Warm up 4/29/ What are the four conditions of monopolistic competition? 2.How do economists determine whether a market is an oligopoly? 3.What.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake United States v. AT&T (D.D.C. 1981) What products did Western Electric provide Bell Operating Companies?
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co. (Sup. Ct. 1967) What had happened to Schwinn’s market share? Three.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Laws and Unfair Trade Practices
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Lorain Journal Co. v. United States (1951) Basic Facts: Defendant, controller newspaper and radio station.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. (1911) Basic Facts: Dr. Miles sold medicines through 400.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Key Words: Cartel: A combination of independent commercial or industrial enterprises designed to gain market.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 26 Antitrust and Monopoly.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Key Words: Cartel: A combination of independent commercial or industrial enterprises designed to gain market.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake FTC v. Superior Ct. Trial Lawyers Assoc. (1990) Base Facts: Boycott by D.C. trial lawyers who demanded higher.
7 th Amendment Lauren Groulik Zach Bird Keith Davis Jessica Klump.
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Market Structures Chapter 7. Get a Sheet of paper out ► List the following on a half sheet of paper:  Three favorite cereals  Three favorite brands.
Market Structures Regulation & Deregulation Chapter 7 Section 4.
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Regulation & Deregulation Chapter 7 Section 4
Chapter 27: Antitrust and Monopoly
CHAPTER 38 Antitrust.
Customized by Professor Ludlum December 1, 2016
Chapter 5 Government Regulation of Competition and Prices
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
Social Studies Ch.2 Study Guide Answers.
Class 5 Antitrust, Winter, 2018 Finding the Agreement
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake
Monopolies and Antitrust Laws
Review Slides – Unit 3 Chapter # Questions
The Role of the Judicial Branch (courts)
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices
C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to Explain the effects of regulation of natural.
Each state has its own judicial system that hears nonfederal cases
Federal and State Courts Notes
How the Federal Gov’t Works: The Judicial Branch
Presentation transcript:

Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Cartel Proof Issues Was there a meeting of the minds? - Express agreement not required. - Subtle accent may do job. 2. How much evidence is required to get case to jury? 3. How best to get the evidence? Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake

Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Interstate Circuit v. U.S. (1939) Why do they call this the “rimless wheel” case? O’Donnell put pressure on movie distributors to require 25 cent price on later runs of A movies and to not allow first run of A movies as part of double feature. What was O’Donnell’s purpose? Only two distributors agreed in writing. According to the court, did others agree? How? What was the impact of lack of testimony? If this viewed as conscious parallelism, what were the “plus” factors? Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake

Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Theater Enterprises v. Paramount Films (1954) Basic Facts: Suit by suburban theater owner for treble damages because 1st run movie distributors limited first run movies to downtown Baltimore theaters. Who won at trial? What did Plaintiff want court to do? Is this any different than Interstate Distributors? Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake

Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Matsushita Electric Industrial v. Zenith Radio Corp (1986) Basic Facts: Zenith and other US TV manufacturers sued Japanese manufactures, claiming they conspired to to sell below cost in the United States in violation of Sherman Act. What was theory on how the Japanese companies could afford to do this? Why would Japanese companies want to do this? What did District Court decide? Why? What did Court of Appeals decide? Why? What was issue before Supreme Court? Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake

Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Wood Pulp Case Before European Court of Justice (1993) Was there any questions all pulp players sold at the same price? What was mechanism to enable all to sell at same price? How did lower commission view the mechanism? What is “concertation”? Was there any concertation? How did court factor in elements of risky competition: long-term market and commercial risks to buyers and sellers. Law 552 - Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake