Subdomain Interactions Foster the Design of Two Protein Pairs with ∼80% Sequence Identity but Different Folds  Lauren L. Porter, Yanan He, Yihong Chen,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between Staphylococcal Virulence Factor Sbi-IV and Complement C3d  Ronald D. Gorham, Wilson Rodriguez, Dimitrios.
Advertisements

Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages L8-L10 (January 2012)
by Sunghyouk Park, Michael E. Johnson, and Leslie W.-M. Fung
Solution Structure of ZASP PDZ Domain
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Michael Adrian, Fernaldo Richtia Winnerdy, Brahim Heddi, Anh Tuân Phan 
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
De Novo Design of Foldable Proteins with Smooth Folding Funnel
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Molecular Recognition of CXCR4 by a Dual Tropic HIV-1 gp120 V3 Loop
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Yuan Yang, Chang Shu, Pingwei Li, Tatyana I. Igumenova 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
The Arginine-Rich RNA-Binding Motif of HIV-1 Rev Is Intrinsically Disordered and Folds upon RRE Binding  Fabio Casu, Brendan M. Duggan, Mirko Hennig 
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of a Novel Globular Domain in RBM10 Containing OCRE, the Octamer Repeat Sequence Motif  Bryan T. Martin, Pedro Serrano,
Dynamic Motions of the HIV-1 Frameshift Site RNA
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Rita Pancsa, Daniele Raimondi, Elisa Cilia, Wim F. Vranken 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Effects of MacroH2A and H2A
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Subdomain Interactions Foster the Design of Two Protein Pairs with ∼80% Sequence Identity but Different Folds  Lauren L. Porter, Yanan He, Yihong Chen, John Orban, Philip N. Bryan  Biophysical Journal  Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages 154-162 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.073 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Engineered proteins with high levels of sequence identity but different folds. Out of 56 residues, 11 and 13 positions of nonidentity remain between the 80GAMBP-80MBPGA and 77GAOspA-77OspAGA fold pairs (top and bottom rows, respectively). (Black) Positions that are identical; colored positions denote remaining positions of nonidentity: (red) 80GAMBP; (blue) 80MBPGA; (purple) 77GAOspA; and (green) 77OspAGA. Color-coding of the sequence alignments corresponds to the coloring of the structures above. (Gray) Segments of MBP and OspA that lie outside of their high-identity subdomains and maintain their wild-type sequences. This figure shows truncated versions of MBP (N-domain only) and OspA (residues 23–116), although both experimental constructs are complete (N- and C-domains for MBP and residues 17–273 for OspA). PDB IDs are as follows: GA, 2FS1; MBP, 1N3X, chain A; OspA, 1OSP, chain O. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 154-162DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.073) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 79GAMBP adopts a 3-α helix bundle topology. (A) Two-dimensional 15N HSQC spectrum of 79GAMBP. Main-chain NMR assignments are indicated. Side-chain amide signals are connected (horizontal lines); x denotes an aliased side-chain amino resonance. (B) NMR structure of 79GAMBP determined using CS-ROSETTA and the main-chain chemical shift assignments. The NMR ensemble of 10 lowest energy structures is shown for residues 6–54 in Cα ribbon representation (black). The parent GA structure, PDB 2FS1, is superimposed (cyan). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 154-162DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.073) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Both 80MBPGA and 77OspAGA fold similarly to their corresponding wild-type forms. (A) The two-dimensional 15N HSQC spectrum of 80GAMBP (blue) is overlaid with positions of assigned backbone resonances from the wild-type MBP spectrum (black). The 80MBPGA spectrum was recorded using similar conditions to those employed for the wild-type MBP (37°C, 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 3 mM sodium azide, 0.1 mg/mL Pefabloc, 2 mol equivalents of β-cyclodextrin). (B) MBP’s binding site complexed with β-cyclodextrin. (Sticks) β-cyclodextrin (yellow) and active-site residues in both the N- and C-domains. MBP’s modified subdomain (blue) contains four of the 14 active-site residues; all residues outside of this subdomain (gray) maintain their wild-type sequences. Only structures near the binding site are shown. PDB 1DMB. (C) The two-dimensional 15N HSQC spectrum of 77OspAGA (green) is consistent with that of wild-type (black). Both were acquired at 10°C in 100 mM of potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 154-162DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.073) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Thermostabilities of GA and MBP variants. Mutational series for GA and MBP begin on opposite sides of the figure (left and right, respectively; dotted line separation indicates that TM values on opposite sides cannot be compared meaningfully). TM values are color-coded by anticipated mutational effects on structure: minor (white), moderate (gray), and substantial (dark gray). The F27A T31L mutation is shown (dark gray) because the anticipated destabilization from the F27A mutation was expected to be significant. Mutations from parent proteins are listed above the TM values of each variant and are color-coded by their structural classification: disordered end (dark blue), surface hydrophilic (light blue), repulsive interaction eliminator (blue), similar noninteracting surface residue (gray), helix to residue with high/medium helix propensity (green), helix to residue with low helix propensity (dark orange-red), sterically disallowed ϕ/ψ angles (brown), change to hydrophobic core (magenta), and repulsive electrostatic interaction (purple). 68GAMBP and 75GAMBP are divided in half to show that two independent sets of mutations were made (see Table S1, A and B. Identity levels for both GA and MBP are with respect to the highest-identity partner. The initial level of identity between GA and MBP was 16%. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 154-162DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.073) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions