Helical peptide models for protein glycation: proximity effects in catalysis of the Amadori rearrangement  Janani Venkatraman, Kamna Aggarwal, P Balaram 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
‘Protein sequencing’: Determining protein sequences
Advertisements

Eric M. Jones, Thomas C. Squier, Colette A. Sacksteder 
Investigation of RNA-Protein and RNA-Metal Ion Interactions by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy  Thomas E Edwards, Tamara M Okonogi, Snorri.
by Sunghyouk Park, Michael E. Johnson, and Leslie W.-M. Fung
Probing Structural Determinants Distal to the Site of Hydrolysis that Control Substrate Specificity of the 20S Proteasome  Michael Groll, Tamim Nazif,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Structure and Dynamics of the Membrane-Bound Form of Pf1 Coat Protein: Implications of Structural Rearrangement for Virus Assembly  Sang Ho Park, Francesca.
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Complementary Structural Mass Spectrometry Techniques Reveal Local Dynamics in Functionally Important Regions of a Metastable Serpin  Xiaojing Zheng,
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Yael T. Aminetzach, John R. Srouji, Chung Yin Kong, Hopi E. Hoekstra 
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Analysis of the Oxidative Damage-Induced Conformational Changes of Apo- and Holocalmodulin by Dose-Dependent Protein Oxidative Surface Mapping  Joshua.
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Heleen Meuzelaar, Jocelyne Vreede, Sander Woutersen 
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Orientational Preferences of Neighboring Helices Can Drive ER Insertion of a Marginally Hydrophobic Transmembrane Helix  Karin Öjemalm, Katrin K. Halling,
Rachel L Winston, Joel M Gottesfeld  Chemistry & Biology 
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Principles of Protein-DNA Recognition Revealed in the Structural Analysis of Ndt80- MSE DNA Complexes  Jason S. Lamoureux, J.N. Mark Glover  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Regulation of protein phosphatase-1
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Mizuki Takahashi, Kiyoshi Nokihara, Hisakazu Mihara 
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Structure of the Tie2 RTK Domain
Semisynthetic Src SH2 Domains Demonstrate Altered Phosphopeptide Specificity Induced by Incorporation of Unnatural Lysine Derivatives  Satpal Virdee,
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
E. coli Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Reveals Structural and Functional Distinctions between Different Classes of Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenases  Sofie.
Structure and Topology of the Huntingtin 1–17 Membrane Anchor by a Combined Solution and Solid-State NMR Approach  Matthias Michalek, Evgeniy S. Salnikov,
Biosynthetic phage display: a novel protein engineering tool combining chemical and genetic diversity  Mary A Dwyer, Wuyuan Lu, John J Dwyer, Anthony.
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
E.Radzio Andzelm, J Lew, S Taylor  Structure 
Active and Inactive Protein Kinases: Structural Basis for Regulation
Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages (September 1998)
Active and Inactive Protein Kinases: Structural Basis for Regulation
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Structure of the EntB Multidomain Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase and Functional Analysis of Its Interaction with the EntE Adenylation Domain  Eric J.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Directed evolution of D-2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate aldolase to new variants for the efficient synthesis of D- and L-sugars  Sun Fong, Timothy D.
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
A Delocalized Proton-Binding Site within a Membrane Protein
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Helical peptide models for protein glycation: proximity effects in catalysis of the Amadori rearrangement  Janani Venkatraman, Kamna Aggarwal, P Balaram  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 611-625 (July 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9

Fig. 1 Schematic representation of the reactions involved in the glycation of proteins. The open chain form of the sugar (glucose) reacts with the ϵ-amino group of lysine residues to form a Schiff base, which undergoes the Amadori rearrangement to form a ketoamine product. This ketoamine is subject to a series of reactions which result in AGEs, one of which is CML. Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 2 Sequences of synthetic peptides used as glycation models. The potential glycation site (Lys6) is in purple, while acidic (Asp10) and basic residues (His10/Arg3) are in red and blue, respectively. Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 3 Spatial juxtaposition of Lys6 (the glycation site) and the catalytic aspartic acid in a peptide helix, viewed perpendicular to (top panel) and down (bottom panel) the helix axis. Lys6 and Asp10 are proximate in KD4, while Lys6 and Asp8 are far apart in KD2. In RKD4, Arg3 and Asp10 lie on the same helix face as Lys6. Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 4 CD spectra of peptides KD4 (red), KD2 (green), KH4 (blue), K14 (pink) and RKD (yellow) in 100% methanol (○) and 50% water/methanol mixtures (▵). Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 5 ESI mass spectra of peptide KD4 (a) showing various charge states observed, (b) 44 h into the glycation reaction (the spectrum shows charge states corresponding to both peptide (e.g. [P+2H]2+) and glycated peptide (e.g. [Pg+2H]2+), see Table 1 for full listing of all charge states observed) and (c) 44 h into the glycation reaction after treatment with hydroxylamine. This glycated species corresponds to the fraction of all glycated KD4 that has undergone the Amadori rearrangement and is hence the ketoamine product. Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 6 ESI mass spectra of peptide KD2 (a) 44 h into the glycation reaction (the spectrum shows charge states corresponding to both peptide (e.g. [P+2H]2+) and glycated peptide (e.g. [Pg+2H]2+)) and (b) 44 h into the glycation reaction after treatment with hydroxylamine. Here too, the peaks in the mass spectrum correspond to the ketoamine product. Comparison of (b) with Fig. 5c reveals less ketoamine formation in the case of KD2 than KD4. Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 7 ESI mass spectra of peptide KH4 (a) 48 h into the glycation reaction, showing charge states corresponding to both peptide (e.g. [P+2H]2+) and glycated peptide (e.g. [Pg+2H]2+) and (b) 48 h into the glycation reaction after treatment with hydroxylamine, showing peaks corresponding to the ketoamine product. Comparison of (b) with Fig. 5c reveals less ketoamine formation in KH4 than KD4. Also seen in both spectra is a peak at m/z 820.5 which corresponds to the doubly charged carboxymethylated derivative of the peptide (CML). Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 8 ESI mass spectra of peptide RKD4 (a) 24 h into the glycation reaction, (b) 24 h into the glycation reaction after treatment with hydroxylamine and (c) 126 h into the glycation reaction. Comparison of (b) with Fig. 5c reveals equivalent amounts of ketoamine formation in peptide RKD4 as compared to KD4. (c) Shows peaks corresponding to the doubly glycated form of peptide RKD4. Also seen in (b) and (c) are peaks at m/z 515.5 and 569.5 which correspond to dehydrated RKD4 and glycated RKD4, respectively. The amidated C-terminus of peptide RKD4 could have undergone dehydration to yield the nitrile. The greater ability of the nitrile to get protonated as compared to the amidated C-terminus of the peptide could be reflected in the observation that only the triply charged species is observed in mass spectra. Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 9 Time course of the glycation reaction for peptides KD4, KD2, KH4 and K14. (a) Compares the rate of total glycation and ketoamine formation in peptides KD4 (•, ▴) and KD2 (○, ▵). Glycated peptide amounts are represented as a percentage of total peptide amounts in the reaction mixture (glycated+unglycated peptide). (b) Performs the same comparison for peptides KH4 (•, ▴) and K14 (○, ▵). Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 10 Time course of the glycation reaction for peptide RKD4. Total glycation (•) is compared with formation of ketoamine and other products resistant to hydrolysis by hydroxylamine (○). Also indicated are the approximate times of appearance of readily detectable amounts of the ketoamine product, the bis-glucose adduct of lysine, the carboxy methylated derivative of mono-glycated lysine and the ketoamine product of the bis-glucose adduct. Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)

Fig. 11 Schematic representation summarizing the reactions occurring on the model peptide helices and the residues involved. The mechanism of Amadori rearrangement on Lys6 is shown as catalyzed by Asp10. The proximity of the arginine residue and its effect on the reactions involving Lys6 are also highlighted. Peptide RKD4 contains all three residues, while KD4 contains only Lys6 and Asp10. Chemistry & Biology 2001 8, 611-625DOI: (10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00036-9)