Mike Paterson Uri Zwick Overhang. Mike Paterson Uri Zwick Overhang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Solve the system of inequalities by graphing. x ≤ – 2 y > 3
AP Physics C Mechanics Review.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Dynamic Programming ACM Workshop 24 August Dynamic Programming Dynamic Programming is a programming technique that dramatically reduces the runtime.
2-1 Solving Linear Equations and Inequalities Warm Up
and 6.855J Cycle Canceling Algorithm. 2 A minimum cost flow problem , $4 20, $1 20, $2 25, $2 25, $5 20, $6 30, $
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Topic 1Topic Q 1Q 6Q 11Q 16Q 21 Q 2Q 7Q 12Q 17Q 22 Q 3Q 8Q 13Q 18Q 23 Q 4Q 9Q 14Q 19Q 24 Q 5Q 10Q 15Q 20Q 25.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
The Ellipse 10.3 Chapter 10 Analytic Geometry 3.4.1
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Uri Feige Microsoft Understanding Parallel Repetition Requires Understanding Foams Guy Kindler Weizmann Ryan ODonnell CMU.
1 LP, extended maxflow, TRW OR: How to understand Vladimirs most recent work Ramin Zabih Cornell University.
Method of Virtual Work.
PLANE KINETICS OF RIGID BODIES
Lecture 43: Course Material Review
1 Using Partial Order Bounding in Shogi Game Programming Workshop 2003 Reijer Grimbergen, Kenji Hadano and Masanao Suetsugu Department of Information Science.
In this section you will:
1 Challenge the future Subtitless On Lightweight Design of Submarine Pressure Hulls.
Minimum Weight Plastic Design For Steel-Frame Structures EN 131 Project By James Mahoney.
Recurrences : 1 Chapter 3. Growth of function Chapter 4. Recurrences.
* Reading Assignments:
Mike Paterson Uri Zwick Overhang. Mike Paterson Uri Zwick Overhang.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
© S Haughton more than 3?
1 Directed Depth First Search Adjacency Lists A: F G B: A H C: A D D: C F E: C D G F: E: G: : H: B: I: H: F A B C G D E H I.
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Mathematics Involving Shape and Space a Algebra. The 9-Dot Problem.
The x- and y-Intercepts
PS-5 Test Review. Questions 1 & 2 Distance – 60m/ magnitude only Displacement 10 m east/ magnitude and direction.
Quantitative Methods Session 1 Chapter 1 - AVERAGE Pranjoy Arup Das.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
Splines I – Curves and Properties
Kinematics Review.
 .
Addition 1’s to 20.
STATIKA STRUKTUR Genap 2012 / 2013 I Made Gatot Karohika ST. MT.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
6.4 Logarithmic Functions
Graph Sketching: Asymptotes and Rational Functions
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Shawn Kenny, Ph.D., P.Eng. Assistant Professor Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science Memorial University of Newfoundland ENGI.
Mathematics1 Mathematics 1 Applied Informatics Štefan BEREŽNÝ.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
9.2 Absolute Value Equations and Inequalities
Systems of Particles.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Mike Paterson Overhang Academic Sponsors’ Day, MSRI, March 2, 2012 Peter Winkler Uri Zwick Yuval Peres Mikkel Thorup.
Joint work with Yuval Peres, Mikkel Thorup, Peter Winkler and Uri Zwick Overhang Bounds Mike Paterson DIMAP & Dept of Computer Science University of Warwick.
Overhang bounds Mike Paterson Joint work with Uri Zwick,
Mike Paterson Yuval Peres Mikkel Thorup Peter Winkler Uri Zwick
Mike Paterson Yuval Peres Mikkel Thorup Peter Winkler Uri Zwick
Mike Paterson Yuval Peres, Mikkel Thorup, Peter Winkler
Presentation transcript:

Mike Paterson Uri Zwick Overhang

Mike Paterson Uri Zwick Overhang

The overhang problem How far off the edge of the table can we reach by stacking n identical blocks of length 1? J.B. Phear – Elementary Mechanics (1850) J.G. Coffin – Problem 3009, American Mathematical Monthly (1923). Real-life 3D versionIdealized 2D version No friction Length parallel to table

The classical solution Harmonic Stacks Using n blocks we can get an overhang of

Is the classical solution optimal? Obviously not!

Inverted triangles? Balanced?

???

Inverted triangles? Balanced?

Inverted triangles? Unbalanced!

Inverted triangles?

Diamonds? The 4-diamond is balanced

Diamonds? The 5-diamond is …

Diamonds? The 5-diamond is Unbalanced!

What really happens?

What really happens!

Why is this unbalanced?

… and this balanced?

Equilibrium F 1 + F 2 + F 3 = F 4 + F 5 x 1 F 1 + x 2 F 2 + x 3 F 3 = x 4 F 4 + x 5 F 5 Force equation Moment equation F1F1 F5F5 F4F4 F3F3 F2F2

Forces between blocks Assumption: No friction. All forces are vertical. Equivalent sets of forces

Balance Definition: A stack of blocks is balanced iff there is an admissible set of forces under which each block is in equilibrium. 11 3

Checking balance

F1F1 F2F2 F3F3 F4F4 F5F5 F6F6 F7F7 F8F8 F9F9 F 10 F 11 F 12 F 13 F 14 F 15 F 16 F 17 F 18 Equivalent to the feasibility of a set of linear inequalities: Static indeterminacy: balancing forces, if they exist, are usually not unique!

Stability and Collapse A feasible solution of the primal system gives a set of stabilizing forces. A feasible solution of the dual system describes an infinitesimal motion that decreases the potential energy.

Balance, Stability and Collapse Most of the stacks considered are precariously balanced, i.e., they are in an unstable equilibrium. In most cases the stacks can be made stable by small modifications. The way unbalanced stacks collapse can be determined in polynomial time

Small optimal stacks Overhang = Blocks = 4 Overhang = Blocks = 5 Overhang = Blocks = 6 Overhang = Blocks = 7

Small optimal stacks

Overhang = Blocks = 16 Overhang = Blocks = 17 Overhang = Blocks = 18 Overhang = Blocks = 19

Support and balancing blocks Principal block Support set Balancing set

Support and balancing blocks Principal block Support set Balancing set

Principal block Support set Stacks with downward external forces acting on them Loaded stacks Size = number of blocks + sum of external forces.

Principal block Support set Stacks in which the support set contains only one block at each level Spinal stacks Assumed to be optimal in: J.F. Hall, Fun with stacking Blocks, American Journal of Physics 73(12), , 2005.

Loaded vs. standard stacks Loaded stacks are slightly more powerful. Conjecture: The difference is bounded by a constant.

Cheating…

Optimal spinal stacks

… Optimality condition:

Spinal overhang Let S (n) be the maximal overhang achievable using a spinal stack with n blocks. Let S * (n) be the maximal overhang achievable using a loaded spinal stack on total weight n. Theorem: A factor of 2 improvement over harmonic stacks! Conjecture:

Optimal 100-block spinal stack Spine Shield Towers

Optimal weight 100 loaded spinal stack

Loaded spinal stack + shield

spinal stack + shield + towers

Are spinal stacks optimal? No! Support set is not spinal! Overhang = Blocks = 20 Tiny gap

Optimal 30-block stack Overhang = Blocks = 30

Optimal (?) weight 100 construction Overhang = Blocks = 49 Weight = 100

Brick-wall constructions

Parabolic constructions 6-stack Number of blocks:Overhang: Balanced!

Using n blocks we can get an overhang of (n 1/3 ) !!! An exponential improvement over the O(log n) overhang of spinal stacks !!!

Parabolic constructions 6-slab 5-slab 4-slab

r-slab

r-slab within a (r+1)-slab

Vases Weight = Blocks = 1043 Overhang = 10

Vases Weight = Blocks = Overhang = 50

Forces within vases

Unloaded vases

Oil lamps Weight = Blocks = 921 Overhang = 10

Forces within oil lamps

Brick-by-brick constructions

Is the (n 1/3 ) the final answer? Mike Paterson Yuval Peres Mikkel Thorup Peter Winkler Uri Zwick Maximum Overhang Yes!

Splitting game Start with 1 at the origin How many splits are needed to get, say, a quarter of the mass to distance n? At each step, split the mass in a given position between the two adjacent positions

Open problems What is the asymptotic shape of vases? What is the asymptotic shape of oil lamps? What is the gap between brick-wall stacks and general stacks? What is the gap between loaded stacks and standard stacks?