Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Microprocessor Activity Controls Differential miRNA Biogenesis In Vivo
Advertisements

Dynamic epigenetic enhancer signatures reveal key transcription factors associated with monocytic differentiation states by Thu-Hang Pham, Christopher.
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Discovery and Characterization of piRNAs in the Human Fetal Ovary
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Transient N-6-Methyladenosine Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role of m6A in Splicing Efficiency  Annita Louloupi, Evgenia Ntini, Thomas.
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages e5 (October 2017)
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Hi-C Analysis in Arabidopsis Identifies the KNOT, a Structure with Similarities to the flamenco Locus of Drosophila  Stefan Grob, Marc W. Schmid, Ueli.
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages (June 2012)
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
DNA Methylation Mediated by a MicroRNA Pathway
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Fine-Resolution Mapping of TF Binding and Chromatin Interactions
Fine-Resolution Mapping of TF Binding and Chromatin Interactions
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Srinivas Ramachandran, Kami Ahmad, Steven Henikoff  Molecular Cell 
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages e4 (October 2018)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Jong-Eun Park, Hyerim Yi, Yoosik Kim, Hyeshik Chang, V. Narry Kim 
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Baekgyu Kim, Kyowon Jeong, V. Narry Kim  Molecular Cell 
Dynamic Regulation of Nucleosome Positioning in the Human Genome
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Julia K. Nussbacher, Gene W. Yeo  Molecular Cell 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e3 (March 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 596-607 (August 2012) Histone Variant H2A.Bbd Is Associated with Active Transcription and mRNA Processing in Human Cells  Michael Y. Tolstorukov, Joseph A. Goldman, Cristele Gilbert, Vasily Ogryzko, Robert E. Kingston, Peter J. Park  Molecular Cell  Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 596-607 (August 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.011 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2012 47, 596-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Properties of H2A.Bbd-Enriched Nucleosomes (A) Schematic illustration of the algorithms used to compute cross- and autocorrelations of sequenced tag frequencies. Nucleosomes are represented with blue ovals. DNA-positive (red) and -negative (green) strands are shown with thick solid lines, and mononucleosomal fragments released by chromatin fragmentation are shown with thin solid lines. Distances between buildups in the frequencies of mapped tags (bell-shaped curves) were used to identify the length of DNA protected by the histone core or the nucleosomal repeat. (B) Crosscorrelation of tag frequency distributions for H2A.Bbd (red) and major H2A variant (blue). Peaks in the tag frequency crosscorrelation plot provide information about the characteristic size of the nucleosome-protected fragment (indicated with numbers). Shorter DNA protection is a characteristic of H2A.Bbd-containing nucleosomes. (C) Input chromatin DNA was compared to immunopurified chromatin DNA as indicated along the top by agarose gel electrophoresis. (D) Autocorrelation of tag frequency distributions is labeled as in (B). The peaks in tag autocorrelation correspond to the nucleosomal repeat lengths, and a shorter repeat length is detected for H2A.Bbd nucleosomes as compared to nucleosomes containing the major H2A variant. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 596-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A Snapshot of the Genome-wide Distribution of H2A Variants Distributions of the sequenced tag density for H2A.Bbd (red), macroH2A (blue), H2A.Z (green), and major H2A variant (gray) are shown within a locus on chromosome 1. The upper track (orange) shows RNA-seq coverage and provides reference of gene expression levels. Gene structure is indicated in green at the bottom of the plot. Note that H2A.Bbd is enriched in active genes, while macroH2A is enriched in silent genes and tends to cover domains spanning several genes. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 596-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Average Enrichment Profiles around Transcription Start and Termination Sites Calculated for the Histone Variants H2A.Bbd, MacroH2A, H2A.Z, and Major H2A The genes were placed into five groups of equal sizes according to their expression levels (expression quantiles, with “0–20%” corresponding to the lowest, and “80–100%” to the highest expression levels). Transcription start and termination sites are indicated with thin green lines. Arrows at the top of the plots indicate direction of the transcription. Overlapping genes and genes shorter than 500 bp were excluded from the analysis. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 596-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Role of H2A.Bbd Variant in Transcription (A) Association of H2A.Bbd-enriched chromatin with different histone marks. Similar amounts of affinity-purified chromatin from the cell lines indicated at the top were analyzed by western blot using antibodies against different histone H3 methylation marks as indicated on the left. Total H3 was used as a chromatin loading control. Marks were grouped according to their relationship with gene location or expression as indicated on the right. (B) Western blot analysis as in (A) but performed with antibodies for RNA polymerase and histone H3. Enrichment with a particular histone variant is determined relative to the amount of RNA polymerase detected with H2A-purified chromatin which is more representative of bulk chromatin. (C) A scatterplot illustrating the changes in gene expression scores upon H2A.Bbd depletion. For each gene with nonzero RNA-seq fragment density in all considered samples, the longest annotated transcript was included in the analysis (∼18,000). The fold changes of the expression values (log2) in the shRNA-treated sample as compared to the control sample are indicated on the y axis. The larger of the expression scores between the shRNA and control samples for each gene is indicated on the x axis. Green and blue squares mark transcripts that were significantly up- or downregulated by H2A.Bbd depletion (absolute value of the expression log2 fold change ≥1 and FDR ≤0.05). Molecular Cell 2012 47, 596-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Association of H2A.Bbd with mRNA Processing (A) Equal amounts of affinity-purified H2A.Bbd and macroH2A chromatin were resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue. (B) Western blots were performed on chromatin affinity purified from the stable cell lines expressing the FLAG-tagged histone indicated at the top (see the Experimental Procedures). Equivalent amounts of chromatin were determined by histone H3 content. Antibodies against spliceosome components are specified on the left for the top five panels. TRAP150 is an H2A.Bbd-enriched protein with roles in both transcription and mRNA processing; EP400 and DAXX westerns indicate specific enrichment of other histone variant purifications. (C) Average enrichment profiles around intron-exon (InEx) and exon-intron (ExIn) junctions calculated for the histone variants H2A.Bbd (red) and H2A.Z (green). Since H2A.Z shows strong enrichment around TSS, the first three exons of each gene were excluded from the analysis to avoid possible artifacts. Also the last exons were excluded to eliminate effects associated with TTS. The dashed blue lines indicate splice junctions, and dotted blue lines give reference of the median size of the exons included in the analysis. The solid blue lines at the top of the plot represent the distributions of the exon centers. The dark red oval schematically depicts the branchpoint. The distances between the stable nucleosome positions flanking the intron-exon junction are indicated for each histone variant. (D and E) Average enrichment profiles calculated for the H2A.Bbd variant within genes containing multiple (D) and single (E) exons. Similar to the analysis for all genes (Figure 3), the genes were placed into five groups of equal sizes according to their expression levels (expression quantiles) and filtered for short and overlapping genes. All genes were scaled to the same length and oriented in the same direction. Thin green lines indicate gene starts and ends, positions zero and one, respectively. The numbers of single and multiple exon genes included in the analysis are indicated above the plots. The 95% confidence intervals are shown for the first and fifth expression qualtiles. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 596-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effect of H2A.Bbd Depletion on mRNA Processing (A) RNA-seq fragment coverage is shown for the locus on chromosome 2 encompassing gene MEIS1 as an example. The coverage for H2A.Bbd-depleted (red), H2A.Z-depleted (green), and control (blue) samples is shown. Normalized counts of the paired-end RNA-seq fragments (number per million of fragments mapped) spanning from exons to adjacent introns, as illustrated for an exon in the middle, are shown for several internal exons. (B) Median values (circles) and 95% confidence intervals (arrows) for the fractions of RNA-seq fragments mapped to the introns for the control and histone variant-depleted samples. Fractions were computed for all multiexon genes with nonzero tag density in both intronic and exonic sequences (∼15,000 genes). Results obtained for all genes are essentially the same (data not shown). The differences between the distributions for all possible sample pairs are significant (p < 10−7). (C) Distributions of “spilling” scores characterizing aberrant splicing. The score is computed for each exon as the ratio between the number of paired reads that have some part of the read within the exon and at least some part outside of any exon of the gene (red read in the schematic illustration where a gray box indicates an exon) to the total number of reads spanning the exon in question (sum of red and green reads). The score of zero means that all RNA-seq fragments belong only to the exonic region, and the score of one means that all fragments “spill over” from the annotated exon. Only those exons that have statistically significant changes in the spilling score between variant-depleted and control samples were considered (see the Experimental Procedures). (D) Occurrences of exon-exon junctions that are supported by the presence of RNA-seq fragments (per 50 million read pairs mapped) spanning between exons of the same gene (green reads), which is indicative of intron splicing. Significance of the difference between the results for control and variant-depleted samples was estimated using ANOVA test, and corresponding p values are indicated. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 596-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions