Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
RNA Ligase Structures Reveal the Basis for RNA Specificity and Conformational Changes that Drive Ligation Forward  Jayakrishnan Nandakumar, Stewart Shuman,
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure and Mechanism of Yeast RNA Triphosphatase
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Structure of an mRNA Capping Enzyme Bound to the Phosphorylated Carboxy-Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II  Carme Fabrega, Vincent Shen, Stewart Shuman,
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
The Active Conformation of the PAK1 Kinase Domain
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Ulp1-SUMO Crystal Structure and Genetic Analysis Reveal Conserved Interactions and a Regulatory Element Essential for Cell Growth in Yeast  Elena Mossessova,
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cet1-Ceg1 mRNA Capping Apparatus  Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 216-227 (February 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.12.009 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of the S. cerevisiae Triphosphatase-Guanylyltransferase Complex (A) Ribbon representation of the complex between the Cet1 RNA triphosphatase and Ceg1 guanylyltransferase. (B) Ninety degree rotation of the model from (A). (C) Ninety degree rotation of the model from (B). Cet1 protomers are color-coded magenta and yellow, and Ceg1 protomers are colored blue. Each molecule is labeled. The Ceg1 NT and OB domains are denoted. N denotes the respective positions for each Cet1 N terminus color-coded magenta or yellow. Yellow and magenta circles indicate the six disordered amino acids between the Cet1 N-terminal WAQKW motif and the triphosphatase domain, respectively. Structural representations were generated using PyMOL (http://pymol.sourceforge.net). Structure 2010 18, 216-227DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.12.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Comparison of Cet1 Crystallized Alone or in Complex with Ceg1 (A) Ribbon representation of the Cet1 dimer determined previously highlighting the conserved tryptophan residues in the WAQKW motif (stick representation) near the Cet1 N terminus (PDB ID code 1D8H) denoted by single-letter amino acid code. (B) Ribbon representation of the Cet1 dimer as observed in the Cet1-Ceg1 complex highlighting the swapped configuration of N-terminal WAQKW motifs with residues in stick representation and denoted by single-letter amino acid code. One Cet1 protomer is shown in magenta while the other is colored yellow. N and C indicate the amino terminus (amino acid 241) and carboxyl terminus (amino acid 549), respectively. Yellow and magenta circles indicate the six disordered amino acids between the Cet1 N-terminal WAQKW motif and the triphosphatase domain, respectively. (C) Ribbon-and-stick representation of the Cet1 active site as observed in PDB ID code 1D8H. (D) Ribbon-and-stick representation of the Cet1 active site from a protomer of Cet1 in the present structure. Structure 2010 18, 216-227DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.12.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Two Orientations Observed for Cet1 with Respect to Ceg1 in the Cet1-Ceg1 Complex (A) Ribbon representation of one Cet1-Ceg1 complex with views highlighting the position for Ceg1 in the complex with respect to Cet1. (B) Same as (A) but for the other complex between Cet1 and Ceg1 in the heterotetramer and asymmetric unit. Ceg1 molecules are presented in the same orientation in (A) and (B) to highlight the differences in orientations with respect to Cet1. Each molecule is color-coded as in Figure 1 with yellow and magenta circles indicating the six disordered amino acids between the Cet1 N-terminal WAQKW motif and the triphosphatase domain, respectively. NT and OB domains are labeled. The distance between Cet1 amino acids 261 and 268 is indicated in each panel. The distance between Cet1 amino acid 510 and Ceg1 amino acid 41 is indicated in each panel. Structure 2010 18, 216-227DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.12.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison between Ceg1 and Cgt1 (A) Ribbon representations of S. cerevisiae Ceg1 (slate) and C. albicans Cgt1 (red). (B) Orthogonal view to (A). Ceg1 and Cgt1 were aligned based on their NT domains, highlighting the conformational differences observed for their respective OB domains. The phosphorylated CTD peptide in the Cgt1 structure is colored yellow in stick representation. The Cet1 N-terminal WAQKW motif is colored in magenta in stick representation in the Ceg1 structure. Domains and polypeptides are labeled. Structure 2010 18, 216-227DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.12.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structural and Mutational Analysis of the Interface between Cet1 and Ceg1 (A) Interactions between the Cet1 WAQKW motif and the Ceg1 OB domain. The OB domain is depicted in ribbon representation with side chains selected for mutational analysis colored yellow in stick representation. The helix-loop insertion in Ceg1 is indicated by a bar and the designation HL. The Cet1 N-terminal element is shown in stick representation in magenta and labeled. Side chains are labeled in black for Ceg1 and magenta for Cet1. (B) Similar to (A) but with Ceg1 depicted in surface view to highlight the deep canyon in which the Cet1 polypeptide binds. Selected Ceg1 amino acids (yellow) are labeled. (C and D) Serial dilutions of S. cerevisiae strains bearing indicated CEG1 alleles (top position at OD600 = 0.5 with three serially diluted concentrations along the vertical axis). The top of each panel indicates the CET1 strain utilized in each analysis, and individual amino acid substitutions are indicated at the bottom of the panel. (C) shows results of a complementation assay in a strain expressing full-length CET1(1–549) and (D) shows results of a complementation assay in a strain expressing CET1(241–549). This latter strain contains a fragment of Cet1 that is analogous to the Cet1 domain determined in the structure of the Cet1-Ceg1 complex. Structure 2010 18, 216-227DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.12.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Stereo Diagram of the Cet1-Ceg1 Complex and Structure-Based Sequence Alignment for Ceg1 and Cgt1 (A) Stick representation of the Ceg1 OB domain with side chains targeted by mutagenesis colored yellow and labeled in black. Cet1 amino acids are labeled and colored in magenta. The helix-loop insertion is indicated by a black bar and the designation HL. (B) Sequence alignment for the OB domains from Ceg1 and Cgt1 with secondary structure elements indicated above or below the respective sequence. Residues targeted for mutational analysis are indicated by black triangles. Residues highlighted in red belong to a hydrophobic cluster that is shared between Ceg1 and Cgt1, while residues highlighted in green are located in the unique Ceg1 HL insertion that contacts Cet1. Disordered regions in our structure are indicated by a dashed line. Structure 2010 18, 216-227DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.12.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for the Organization of the Cet1-Ceg1 Capping Apparatus On the left is a schematic of the Cet1-Ceg1 complex with one Cet1 protomer shown bound to the phosphorylated RNAP IIo CTD via the NT domain in the open configuration ready to bind substrates or release products. Interactions between the Ceg1 OB domain and one Cet1 protomer WAQKW motif are followed by a flexible linker that tethers the Ceg1 OB domain to the Cet1 triphosphatase. On the right is a schematic of the Cet1-Ceg1 complex with Ceg1 in the closed configuration illustrating that Ceg1 can undergo the conformational changes required for capping while maintaining interactions with Cet1 and the phosphorylated RNAP IIo CTD. Structure 2010 18, 216-227DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.12.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions