PKA-GluA1 Coupling via AKAP5 Controls AMPA Receptor Phosphorylation and Cell- Surface Targeting during Bidirectional Homeostatic Plasticity  Graham H.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Advertisements

Biphasic Alteration of the Inhibitory Synapse Scaffold Protein Gephyrin in Early and Late Stages of an Alzheimer Disease Model  Eva Kiss, Karin Gorgas,
Zilong Qiu, Anirvan Ghosh  Neuron 
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
NMDA Induces Long-Term Synaptic Depression and Dephosphorylation of the GluR1 Subunit of AMPA Receptors in Hippocampus  Hey-Kyoung Lee, Kimihiko Kameyama,
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Dopaminergic Stimulation of Local Protein Synthesis Enhances Surface Expression of GluR1 and Synaptic Transmission in Hippocampal Neurons  W. Bryan Smith,
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Andres Barria, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Jason Aoto, Christine I. Nam, Michael M. Poon, Pamela Ting, Lu Chen 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 120, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
The Retromer Supports AMPA Receptor Trafficking During LTP
Anuradha Rao, Ann Marie Craig  Neuron 
A Role for Stargazin in Experience-Dependent Plasticity
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Subcellular Dynamics of Type II PKA in Neurons
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Visualization of Subunit-Specific Delivery of Glutamate Receptors to Postsynaptic Membrane during Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation  Hiromitsu Tanaka,
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Rapid Dispersion of SynGAP from Synaptic Spines Triggers AMPA Receptor Insertion and Spine Enlargement during LTP  Yoichi Araki, Menglong Zeng, Mingjie.
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2009)
Bo Li, Ran-Sook Woo, Lin Mei, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Matthew S. Kayser, Mark J. Nolt, Matthew B. Dalva  Neuron 
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 20, Pages (October 2007)
The PAR-6 Polarity Protein Regulates Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis through p190 RhoGAP and the Rho GTPase  Huaye Zhang, Ian G. Macara  Developmental Cell 
Cecile Bats, Laurent Groc, Daniel Choquet  Neuron 
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Takashi Hayashi, Gareth M. Thomas, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
Takashi Hayashi, Gavin Rumbaugh, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (June 2008)
Growth Factor-Dependent Trafficking of Cerebellar NMDA Receptors via Protein Kinase B/Akt Phosphorylation of NR2C  Bo-Shiun Chen, Katherine W. Roche 
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
FMRP Acts as a Key Messenger for Dopamine Modulation in the Forebrain
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Arc/Arg3.1 Mediates Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling of AMPA Receptors
Yang Z. Huang, Enhui Pan, Zhi-Qi Xiong, James O. McNamara  Neuron 
Postsynaptic Complexin Controls AMPA Receptor Exocytosis during LTP
Presentation transcript:

PKA-GluA1 Coupling via AKAP5 Controls AMPA Receptor Phosphorylation and Cell- Surface Targeting during Bidirectional Homeostatic Plasticity  Graham H. Diering, Ahleah S. Gustina, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron  Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages 790-805 (November 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Levels of Phosphorylated AMPAR Change during Homeostatic Scaling (A) Cortical neurons (13 DIV) were treated 24 or 48 hr with control media (Con), bicuculline (Bic, 20 μM), or tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 μM), followed by surface biotinylation and western blot. (B) Quantification of cell-surface levels of the AMPAR subunits GluA1, GluA2, or GluA3. (C) Quantification of total levels of phosphorylated GluA1 S845 or S831 or GluA2 S880. Values relative to control, indicated by the dashed line. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. Error bars indicate ± SEM. n = 4–6 independent experiments. See also Figure S1. Neuron 2014 84, 790-805DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Reorganization of Synaptic PKA Signaling during Scaling (A) Cortical neurons (13–14 DIV) were treated with bicuculline/TTX for 48 hr, and the indicated molecules were examined by western blot (n = 5). (B) Quantification of (A) (n = 5). (C) Cortical neurons (13–14 DIV) were treated with bicuculline/TTX for 48 hr followed by 10 nM isoproterenol (Iso) for 5 min. (D) Changes in pS845 were quantified by western blot. Iso-induced increases in pS845 were reduced by bicuculline and enhanced by TTX treatment (n = 6). (E–H) Hippocampal neurons (14 DIV) transfected with GFP and treated with bicuculline or TTX. The localization of PKA catalytic subunit (E) or AKAP5 (G) to dendritic spines was observed and quantified (F and H) (n = 50–75 spines each from 11–17 neurons. Scale bar, 5 μm. PKA has strong dendritic shaft localization but is observed in dendritic spines. Following bicuculline treatment, PKA moves out of spines. (I) AKAP5 was immunoprecipitated from bicuculline/TTX-treated cortical neurons (13–14 DIV). Coimmunoprecipitation of PKA is reduced following bicuculline treatment (n = 3). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. Error bars indicate ± SEM. See also Figures S1 and S3. Neuron 2014 84, 790-805DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Levels and Cellular Distribution of PKA Activity during Scaling (A) Cortical neurons (13–14 DIV) were treated with bicuculline/TTX for 48 hr. Global PKA or PKC activity was assessed by western blot of whole-cell lysates using pan phosphosubstrate antibodies. (B) Quantification of pan phosphosubstrate blots indicates a significant reduction in PKA activity in whole-cell lysate after TTX treatment (n = 6). (C) PKA activity was visualized using a FRET-based A-kinase activity reporter, AKAR4, transfected into cortical neurons (13–15 DIV) treated with bicuculline/TTX for 48 hr. The false color scale is indicated. Scale bar, 5 μm. (D) FRET spine enrichment value; N = 50–70 spines each from 9–18 neurons. (E) PSD preparations from cultured cortical neurons. Homogenate (Homo.), cytosol fraction (S2), membrane fraction (P2), PSD fraction (PSD). (F) Western blot for PKA phosphosubstrate or AKAP5 in PSD samples from control, bicuculline-, or TTX-treated neurons. (G) PKA substrate blot indicates an increase in PKA activity in the PSD following TTX treatment (n = 4). (H) AKAP5 in the PSD was significantly increased following TTX treatment (n = 4). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. Error bars indicate ± SEM. See also Figures S2 and S3. Neuron 2014 84, 790-805DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 AKAP5 Knockdown Partly Occludes Scaling down and Blocks Scaling up (A) Cortical neurons (13–14 DIV) electroporated with control vector (pSuper) or shRNA against rat AKAP5 (shAKAP5) and treated with bicuculline/TTX for 48 hr followed by surface biotinylation and western blot. (B) Surface levels of GluA1, GluA2, or GluA3 were quantified (n = 5). (C) Total levels of phosphorylated GluA1 S845 or S831 or GluA2 S880 were quantified (n = 5). Data are normalized and compared statistically to untreated vector-transfected controls. (D) Cortical neurons (13–14 DIV) were cotransfected with GFP together with control vector, shAKAP5, or shAKAP5/human myc-tagged AKAP5 (sh+rescue) and treated with bicuculline/TTX for 48 hr. Surface GluA1 was labeled with an anti-N-terminal antibody followed by immunofluorescence microscopy. GFP (green), surface GluA1 (magenta). Scale bar, 20 μm; inset, 5 μm. (E) Surface GluA1 signal from transfected cells was quantified (N = approximately 10 dendrite segments each from 20–35 transfected neurons). Data are normalized and compared statistically to untreated vector-transfected controls. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. Error bars indicate ± SEM. See also Figure S4. Neuron 2014 84, 790-805DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 S845 of GluA1 Is Required for TTX-Induced Scaling up (A–F) Mouse cortical neurons (14–15 DIV) cultured from wild-type (WT) or S831A or S845A GluA1 knockin mice were treated for 48 hr with bicuculline/TTX. (A) Surface biotinylation and western blot. (B) Quantification indicates that scaling up is blocked in S845A neurons (n = 7). Data from each genotype are normalized to untreated controls. (C) mEPSC recordings from WT, S831A, or S845A cortical neurons following 48 hr of drug treatment. (D) Quantification of mEPSC amplitude (n = 5–11). Data from each genotype are normalized to untreated controls. (E) Surface GluA1 was labeled using an anti-N-terminal antibody under nonpermeabilized conditions following 48 hr of drug treatment. Scale bar, 20 μm; inset, 5 μm. (F) Surface GluA1 levels were quantified on 10–15 dendritic segments each from 20–24 neurons. Data from each genotype are normalized to untreated controls. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01; ns, no statistical significance. Error bars indicate ± SEM. See also Figure S5. Neuron 2014 84, 790-805DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 PKA Activity Drives Scaling up (A–F) Cultured cortical neurons (13–14 DIV) were treated for 48 hr with control media or combinations of bicuculline (20 μM), TTX (1 μM), forskolin + rolipram (FR, 2.5 μM/100 nM), or FK506 (2.5 μM). (A) Drug treatment was followed by surface biotinylation and western blot. (B) Quantification of surface GluA1 or total phospho-S845. Treatment with FR or FK506 increased GluA1 surface levels occluding the effects of TTX. FR causes a high level of S845 phosphorylation that is maintained throughout scaling (n = 6). (C) Following drug treatments, surface GluA1 (magenta) was labeled followed by total VGlut1 (green). Scale bar, 5 μm. (D) Surface GluA1 fluorescence intensity was quantified only at areas that overlapped with the synapse marker VGlut1 (n = 24 fields). FR treatment increased synaptic surface GluA1 to a degree similar to that of TTX. FR and TTX showed an additive effect. (E) mEPSC recording from cortical neurons following 48 hr of drug treatment. (F) Quantification of mEPSC amplitude. FR treatment increased mEPSC amplitude to a degree similar to that of TTX. FR and TTX showed an additive effect. N = 7–15; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01; ns, no statistical significance. Error bars indicate ± SEM. See also Figure S6. Neuron 2014 84, 790-805DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Phosphorylated S845 AMPARs Are Resistant to Scaling down (A–E) Cortical neurons (13–14 DIV) were treated with bicuculline (20 μM), TTX (1 μM), or forskolin/rolipram (FR, 2.5 μM/100 nM) for 48 hr. (A) Surface biotinylation and western blot. Blots were probed for surface GluA1 and then reprobed for surface phospho-S845. (B) Quantification of surface phospho-S845. Surface phospho-S845 receptors are maintained at a high level in the presence of FR throughout the scaling process, despite the observation that total surface GluA1 levels are reduced in the presence of bicuculline (n = 4). (C) PSD preparation from drug-treated neurons. PSD samples were probed for GluA1 and phospho-S845 by western blot. (D) Phospho-S845 receptors are retained in the PSD during scaling under conditions of high PKA activity (FR) (n = 3). (E) Phospho-S845 receptors were localized by comparing their distribution to total GluA1 and VGlut1. Scale bar, 5 μm. Phospho-S845 receptors are localized to synapses as seen from the triple colocalization and are maintained at the synapse in the presence of bicuculline. Note that phospho-S845 receptors are only visible by immunofluorescence in the presence of FR. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01; ns, no statistical significance. Error bars indicate ± SEM. See also Figure S7. Neuron 2014 84, 790-805DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Scaling and Chemical LTP (A–H) Cortical neurons (13–14 DIV) were treated with bicuculline (20 μM)/TTX (1 μM) for 48 hr, followed by chemical LTP (cLTP) using glycine (Gly; 200 μM; 5 min treatment, 20 min chase). (A) Neurons were then surface biotinylated and lysed for western blot. (B) Quantification of surface GluA1 and phospho-S845 western blots. Glycine treatment in control neurons results in increased surface GluA1 and phospho-S845 levels (n = 5). Increases are blocked by treatment with bicuculline or occluded by treatment with TTX. (C) Neurons were treated as in (A), followed by fixation and surface GluA1 labeling with an anti-N-terminal antibody. Scale bar, 20 μm; inset, 5 μm. (D) Surface GluA1 levels were quantified on 10–15 dendritic segments each from 28–32 neurons per condition. (E) Following scaling and cLTP treatments, cortical neurons were fractionated to obtain PSD samples. PSD material was analyzed by western blot. (F) cLTP results in increased levels of synaptic GluA1 and GluA2 in control neurons but not in neurons pretreated with bicuculline or TTX. For each scaling condition, data are presented as glycine treated relative to untreated, indicated by the dashed line (n = 3). (G) Surface GluA1 (magenta) and total VGlut1 (green) were labeled following scaling and cLTP. Scale bar, 5 μm. (H) Surface GluA1 fluorescence intensity was quantified only at areas that overlapped with the synapse marker VGlut1. For each scaling condition, data are presented as glycine treated relative to untreated (n = 35 fields). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. ns, no statistical significance. Error bars indicate ± SEM. Neuron 2014 84, 790-805DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Model of Signaling Mechanisms Affecting AMPA Receptor Phosphorylation during Scaling, LTP, and LTD Scaling involves a change in the coupling of basal PKA with AMPA receptors via AKAP5, resulting in increased or decreased AMPA receptor phosphorylation. LTP and LTD involve the activation and recruitment of kinases or phosphatases, respectively, to increase or decrease AMPA receptor phosphorylation, respectively. Note that AKAP5 also participates in LTP and LTD. Neuron 2014 84, 790-805DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions