FEA PSD Response for Base Excitation using Femap, Nastran & Matlab

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 2 Modal Analysis ANSYS Dynamics.
Advertisements

Review. 2 TEST A 1.What is the single most important property of vibrating structure? 2. What happens when structure is vibrating in resonance? 3.What.
Finite Element Analysis and Testing Correlation of the Mercury Laser Altimeter Craig L. Stevens Mechanical Systems Analysis & Simulation.
Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
Mechanical Systems Analysis Branch/Code 542 Goddard Space Flight Center Analysis of Damping Treatments Applied to the MAP Spacecraft Scott Gordon Code.
Structural Qualification Testing of the WindSat Payload Using Sine Bursts Near Structural Resonance Jim Pontius Donald Barnes.
Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen
© The Aerospace Corporation 2009 Acoustic Analysis of 1.5- and 1.2-meter Reflectors Mike Yang ATA Engineering, Inc. June 9, 2009.
Multi-degree-of-freedom System Shock Response Spectrum
Circuit Board Fatigue Response to Random Vibration Part 2
Modal Analysis of Functionally Graded Rectangular Plates Wes Saunders Engineering Project Proposal.
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.Smarter decisions, better products. What’s New Femap /
FE Modeling Strategy Decide on details from design Find smallest dimension of interest Pick element types – 1D Beams – 2D Plate or.
MODULE 12 RANDOM VIBRATION.
Vibrationdata 1 SDOF Response to Power Spectral Density Base Input Unit 13.
General Method for Calculating the Vibration Response Spectrum
RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD
The Craig-Bampton Method
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Design Analysis ‘n Manufacturing By - Yogesh Arora and Sangam Sinha.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Copyright © 2010 Altair Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.Altair Proprietary and Confidential Information Section 13 Loads and Boundary Conditions.
Two computations concerning fatigue damage and the Power Spectral Density Frank Sherratt.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain.
© EADS Astrium Final Presentation, Friedrichshafen, April 18th, 2007 MULTIBODY ANALYSIS OF SOLAR ARRAY DEPLOYMENT USING FLEXIBLE BODIES Bagnoli Luca Final.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
NX nastran SEMODES 103 – Response Simlation
Unit 14 Synthesizing a Time History to Satisfy a Power Spectral Density using Random Vibration.
Support Tube Dynamic Analysis KEK’s ANSYS simulation –model details –Single Point Response Spectrum analysis SUGGESTED improvements –beam model –Harmonic.
1 CAEnable Ltd. Copyright 2006 CAEnable, Ltd – Confidential Information. Duplication or distribution prohibited. Engineering Competencies Design of Metal.
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S14-1MAR120, Section 14, December 2001 SECTION 14 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS.
Using Fatigue to Compare Sine and Random Environments
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain.
Finite Element Analysis
Two-degree-of-freedom System with Translation & Rotation
© 2012 Autodesk A Fast Modal (Eigenvalue) Solver Based on Subspace and AMG Sam MurgieJames Herzing Research ManagerSimulation Evangelist.
Power Spectral Density Functions of Measured Data
S8-1 SECTION 8 ENFORCED MOTION. S8-2 ENFORCED MOTION n Used to analyze constrained structures with base input acceleration, velocity, displacement. n.
Finite Element Solution of Fluid- Structure Interaction Problems Gordon C. Everstine Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Div. Bethesda, Maryland
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 20 Digital Filtering, Part 2.
Vibrationdata Synthesizing a Time History to Satisfy a Power Spectral Density using Random Vibration Unit 14 1.
Vibrationdata 1 Power Spectral Density Function PSD Unit 11.
1 MME3360b Assignment 0310% of final mark Due date:March 19, 2012 Five problems each worth 20% of assignment mark.
Finite-Element Analysis
NESC Academy 1 Rainflow Cycle Counting for Continuous Beams By Tom Irvine Unit 34.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 18 Force Vibration Response Spectrum.
Mode Superposition Module 7. Training Manual January 30, 2001 Inventory # Module 7 Mode Superposition A. Define mode superposition. B. Learn.
Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen
INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF ROBOTS (Part 2)
Force Vibration Response Spectrum
Modal Analysis of an Exhaust Manifold using NX CAE
WORKSHOP 2 SOLID-TO-SOLID CONTACT
ILC MDI Platform Concept
Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
Rectangular & Circular Plate Shock & Vibration
Crab Cavity support system update
ENFORCED MOTION IN TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
FEA Introduction.
Global Local Analysis Pierre-Luc Messier, ing. FEMAP SYMPOSIUM 2018
Nastran 101 February 28, 2008.
Femap Structural Analysis Toolkit (SATK)
Lecture 3: Vibration in Transport presented by David Shires
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
Equivalent Static Loads for Random Vibration
Nastran FEA Base Excitation Response Spectrum
Avionics Component Shock Sensitivity
Nastran FEA Base Excitation with Multiple Response Spectrum Inputs
Nastran FEA Frequency Response Function for Base Input Revision B
Two-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
Presentation transcript:

FEA PSD Response for Base Excitation using Femap, Nastran & Matlab Unit 204 FEA PSD Response for Base Excitation using Femap, Nastran & Matlab Students should already have some familiarity with Femap & Nastran NX Nastran is used as the solver, but the methods should work with other versions

Introduction Shock and vibration analysis can be performed either in the frequency or time domain Continue with plate from Unit 200 Aluminum, 12 x 12 x 0.25 inch Translation constrained at corner nodes Mount plate to heavy seismic mass via rigid links Use “Random Response” analysis PSD is “power spectral density” Compare results with modal transient analysis from Unit 203 The following software steps must be followed carefully, otherwise errors will result   Rigid links

Procedure, part I Femap, NX Nastran and the Vibrationdata Matlab GUI package are all used in this analysis The GUI package can be downloaded from: https://vibrationdata.wordpress.com/ The mode shapes are shown on the next several slides for review  

NAVMAT PSD Base Input

Femap: Mode Shape 1 The fundamental mode at 117.6 Hz has 93.3% of the total modal mass in the T3 axis The acceleration response also depends on higher modes

Femap: Mode Shape 6 The sixth mode at 723 Hz has 3.6% of the total modal mass in the T3 axis

Femap: Mode Shape 12 The twelfth mode at 1502 Hz has 1.6% of the total modal mass in the T3 axis

Femap: Mode Shape 19 The 19th mode at 2266 Hz has only 0.3% of the total modal mass in the T3 axis But it still makes a significant contribution to the acceleration response

Matlab: Node 1201 Parameters for T3 fn (Hz) Modal Mass Fraction Participation Factor Eigenvector 1 117.6 0.933 0.0923 13.98 6 723.6 0.036 0.0182 22.28 12 1502 0.017 0.0123 2.499 19 2266 0.003 0.0053 32.22 The Participation Factors & Eigenvectors are shown as absolute values The Eigenvectors are mass-normalized Modes 1, 6, 12 & 19 account for 98.9% of the total mass

Femap: Define Damping Function

FEMAP: Function Definition

Femap: Define Accel PSD Function   The X-axis unit is Frequency (Hz) The Y-axis unit is Accel (G^2/Hz)

Femap: Constraints Edit corner node constraints so that only TX & TY are fixed

Femap: Added Points and Node Copy center point twice at -3 inch increments in the Z-axis Place node on point at middle point

Femap: Select Rigid Element

Femap: Configure Rigid Element, RBE2 Dependent DOF is TZ Dependent Nodes are the corner nodes Node 2402 is the independent Node, -3 inch from plate’s center node in Z-axis

Femap: Plate with Rigid Element Rigid Link Node 2402

Femap: Load Set Step 1: Create Load Set Step 2: Dynamic Analysis

Femap: Load Set  

FEMAP: Rigid Connecting Link

FEMAP: Constrain Base Mass Node Note that the Z-axis is perpendicular to the plate

FEMAP: Model with Constraints

Femap: Node Check This step may be unnecessary but it is a “good engineering” practice

Femap: Renumber Nodes

Femap: Node Group Node 1 Node 49 Node 2402 Node 1201 Node 2403

Femap: Element Group Element 50 Node 1201 Element 1129

Femap: Random Response

Femap: Analysis Steps

Femap: Analysis, Solution Frequencies, etc.

Femap: Analysis Steps, PSD & Boundary Conditions PSD Function, previously defined

Femap: Analysis Final Step Export the analysis model Run in Nastran Post-process the f06 file using the Matlab script as shown in the following slides

Vibrationdata Matlab GUI

Vibrationdata: Nastran Toolbox

Vibrationdata: Nastran PSD Post-processing

NAVMAT PSD Base Input

PSD Response at Plate Center Node This plot agrees with the result obtained in Unit 203

PSD Response at Plate Mid Edge Node This plot agrees with the result obtained in Unit 203