Anke Kiessling, Bianca Sperl, Angela Hollis, Dirk Eick, Thorsten Berg 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proteasome Inhibition by Fellutamide B Induces Nerve Growth Factor Synthesis John Hines, Michael Groll, Margaret Fahnestock, Craig M. Crews Chemistry &
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
John Hines, Michael Groll, Margaret Fahnestock, Craig M. Crews 
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Nucleosomes and Cisplatin
Enzyme Annotation with Chemical Tools
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Nucleosomes and Cisplatin
RhoGDI Is Required for Cdc42-Mediated Cellular Transformation
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Adding Specificity to Artificial Transcription Activators
TAB1: A Target of Triptolide in Macrophages
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Targeting the Undruggable Proteome: The Small Molecules of My Dreams
John Hines, Michael Groll, Margaret Fahnestock, Craig M. Crews 
The Molecular Clock Mediates Leptin-Regulated Bone Formation
Biofilm Inhibitors that Target Amyloid Proteins
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Wenqi Wang, Nan Li, Xu Li, My Kim Tran, Xin Han, Junjie Chen 
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (July 2007)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Small Molecule Fluoride Toxicity Agonists
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Unbiased Proteomic Profiling Strategy for Discovery of Bacterial Effector Proteins Reveals that Salmonella Protein PheA Is a Host Cell Cycle Regulator 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Activity-Based Profiling for Drug Discovery
Ai-Sun Tseng, Felix B. Engel, Mark T. Keating  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
A Structure-Guided Approach to Creating Covalent FGFR Inhibitors
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
The Flip Side Chemistry & Biology
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
DNA binding of activator protein-1 is increased in human mesangial cells cultured in high glucose concentrations  William A. Wilmer, Fernando G. Cosio 
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Jae Won Chang, Daniel K. Nomura, Benjamin F. Cravatt 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Inhibitor Mediated Protein Degradation
An Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Identifies a Mechanistically Unique Inhibitor of Protein Sumoylation  Yeong Sang Kim, Katelyn Nagy, Samantha Keyser,
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
A Direct Inhibitor of HMGB1 Cytokine
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
UA62784 Is a Cytotoxic Inhibitor of Microtubules, not CENP-E
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
HOS1 Facilitates the Phytochrome B-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Function during Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis  Ju-Heon Kim, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung,
Ligand-Regulated Peptides: A General Approach for Modulating Protein-Peptide Interactions with Small Molecules  Brock F. Binkowski, Russell A. Miller,
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 19, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages (October 2000)
Aaron T. Wright, Benjamin F. Cravatt  Chemistry & Biology 
Changes in integrin expression during adipocyte differentiation
Shipra Das, Olga Anczuków, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages (October 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Selective Inhibition of c-Myc/Max Dimerization and DNA Binding by Small Molecules  Anke Kiessling, Bianca Sperl, Angela Hollis, Dirk Eick, Thorsten Berg  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 745-751 (July 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.05.011 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Inhibition of c-Myc by Inhibitors of the c-Myc/Max Interaction c-Myc can activate gene transcription by direct binding of c-Myc/Max heterodimers to specific DNA binding elements referred to as E-box elements and can repress gene transcription by indirect DNA binding of c-Myc/Max dimers via the zinc-finger protein Miz-1. Since all known biological functions of c-Myc require binding to its activating partner Max, inhibition of the interaction between c-Myc and Max by a small organic molecule (indicated by the star) would inhibit all known biological functions of c-Myc. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 745-751DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.05.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Mycros Inhibit DNA Binding of c-Myc by Blocking the Interaction between c-Myc and Max (A) Binding of the transcription factor dimers c-Myc/Max, Max/Max, Jun/Jun, und C/EBPα-C/EBPα to fluorophore-labeled oligonucleotides comprising their DNA target sequences as assessed by fluorescence polarization. (B) Chemical structures of Mycro1 (1), Mycro2 (2), and the inactive derivative 3. (C) Activity profile of Mycro1 against DNA binding of c-Myc/Max, Max/Max, Jun/Jun, and C/EBPα-C/EBPα as assessed by fluorescence polarization. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean (SEM). (D) Activity profile of Mycro2 against DNA binding of c-Myc/Max, Max/Max, Jun/Jun, and C/EBPα/C/EBPα as assessed by fluorescence polarization. Error bars represent SEM. (E) Activity profile of Mycro1 and Mycro2 against DNA binding of c-Myc/Max heterodimers in EMSA. All assigned lanes contain c-Myc, Max, and labeled E box, except the first lane (labeled E Box only, no proteins) and the second lane (Max and labeled E Box, no c-Myc). (F) Activity profile of Mycro1 and Mycro2 against DNA binding of Jun/Fos heterodimers in EMSA. All assigned lanes contain Jun, Fos, and labeled TRE, with the exception of the first lane on each gel (labeled TRE only, no proteins) and the second lane (Jun and labeled TRE, no Fos). (G) Mycro1 and Mycro2 inhibit the protein-protein interactions between CFP-tagged c-Myc and GST-tagged Max in a GST pull-down assay. The anti-GFP antibody used does not discriminate between the various GFP mutants. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 745-751DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.05.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mycro1 and Mycro2 Inhibit c-Myc-Dependent Cell Proliferation and Delay S-Phase Entry Mycro1 and Mycro2 inhibit proliferation of the c-Myc-dependent cell lines U-2OS (A), MCF-7 (B), Raji (C), and NIH/3T3 (D). (E) Mycro1 and Mycro2 delay S-phase entry as analyzed by a BrdU incorporation assay in NIH/3T3 cells. (F) Mycro1 and Mycro2 do not inhibit proliferation of the c-Myc-independent cancer cell line PC-12. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD). Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 745-751DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.05.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mycro1 and Mycro2 Selectively Inhibit Transcription in a c-Myc-Dependent Reporter Gene Assay (A) Mycro1 and Mycro2 inhibit c-Myc-dependent luciferase gene activation. (B) Effect of Mycro1 and Mycro2 on transcriptional activity of the AP-1 transcription factors induced by addition of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate. (C) Effect of Mycro1 and Mycro2 on serum response factor-dependent luciferase gene activation. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM). Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 745-751DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.05.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mycro1 and Mycro2 Selectively Reduce Anchorage-Independent Growth of c-Myc-Transformed Rat1a Cells Rat1a cells transformed with c-Myc (Rat1/c-myc) or v-Src (Rat1a/v-src) were seeded in soft agar and treated with the indicated concentration of test compounds. Colonies larger than 0.13 mm in diameter were counted. ∗p < 0.015 as compared to DMSO. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD). Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 745-751DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.05.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions