Assessment of Reporting on Competent Authorities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Making legislation work better for citizens and business The IMI NETWORK Bucharest, 23 rd June 2008 Presentation.
Advertisements

MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION Summary of MSFD Requirements; EU project management arrangements; Descriptors of most.
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
WP3: Peer Learning Activity, 9th/ 10th of April 2008, Vienna With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union 1 Work package 3.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Expert Group on Natura 2000 Management Meeting of 19 May 2011 Fact Sheet on Member State Natura 2000 Management Planning THE N2K GROUP.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Working Group on Data, information and knowledge exchange
EU Water Framework Directive
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
Draft Article 8 MSFD assessment guidance
WORKSHOP 17th Sept 2008 EUROPEAN COMMISSION
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation
Report on WISE Art.8 and GIS issues
1.
EU Water Framework Directive
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
MSFD Article 12 assessment Follow-up on geographic issues
European Commission DG Environment
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting
Meeting of WG DIS, October 2015, Brussels
DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals
EU Water Framework Directive
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
WG DIS May 2016 Based on a presentation prepared by
Preliminary methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on Programme of Measures (Article 16) WG DIKE Sarine Barsoumian (12/10/2015, Brussels)
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting Art. 8/9/10
WG GES, 6 December 2016, Brussels
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
Revision of Decision 2010/477/EU Overview of main changes
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Contents of the Art.20 report
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
Developing a common understanding of Articles 8, 9 & 10 MSFD
Common Understanding Way forward
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Comparison of methodologies for defining Good Ecological Potential
Legal and implementation issues update
Working group on data & information sharing DIS under CIS of WFD
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Overview of the implementation of the SEA directive
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Marine Strategy Framework Directive reporting: progress and next steps
Revision of Decision 2010/477/EU
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Conclusion and action points
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
MSFD – WFD assessment European Commission DG Environment
Assessment scales and aggregation
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
European waters - assessment of status and pressures 2018
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
DG Environment, Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of Reporting on Competent Authorities Claire Dupont, Milieu Ltd., 13 November 2012

Member States’ Obligations Article 7 requires MS to designate CAs by 15 July 2010 and report to the Commission on 15 January 2011 on: CAs designated pursuant to Annex II CAs participating in international bodies relevant for the implementation of the MSFD CA(s) competent for cooperation and coordination within the catchment area of each marine region or subregion (Art.6)

The different elements of Annex II Name and address Legal status: administrative level of authority e.g. national/regional and the type of authority (ministry, agency) and relevant key hierarchical relationships Legal and administrative responsibilities and role Membership: when the CA(s) acts as a coordinating body for other competent authorities, a list of these together with a summary of the institutional relationships to ensure coordination. Regional or subregional coordination: summary of the mechanisms to ensure coordination between the MS whose marine waters fall within the same marine region or subregion.

Assessment topics Assessment topics The CA(s) for the implementation of the Directive For the preparation of the initial assessment For the determination of GES and the establishment of environmental targets and associated indicator For the monitoring programme For the programme of measures The CA(s) for cooperation at the marine region or sub-region level The legal status of the CA(s) The legal and administrative responsibilities of the CA(s) and their role in relation to the marine waters concerned When the CA(s) act(s) as a coordinating body for other CAs, a list of membership and a summary of the institutional relationship to ensure coordination The mechanisms for coordination between the MS in shared marine region(s) or sub-region(s) Preparation of an assessment questionnaire on the basis of the requirements of MSFD Article 7 and Annex II, including where appropriate linkages to other aspects of MSFD implementation (e.g. links between the Competent Authority(ies) and implementation of key Articles such as assessments, monitoring and measures). Analysis of reports submitted by Member States (either electronically into ReportNet or via letter) according to the questionnaire/evaluation process. This task has been carried out by national experts. Preparation of a draft report presenting the Member State analysis, together with recommended actions Revision of the draft report following comments from DG Environment On legal and administrative responsibilities and role: descriptions of the broader roles and responsibilities of the CA, beyond the MSFD itself: for example, whether the CA has a specific mandate for marine waters or a role in areas such as fisheries or offshore permits

General Results All MS have reported except for PL, CZ and HU Level of information provided by MS varies greatly in terms of volume or content Fields where information was less complete are: coordination mechanisms between MS, and to a lesser extent, legal status, role & responsibilities, coordination amongst CAs e.g., about 30 pages of material for some MS, while some Member States only filled in the ReportNet form in a minimal fashion Some Member States only reported information in national legislation, while others provided greater description.

Key findings Description of CAs responsible for implementation and cooperation between MS: generally well reported but not all MS have distinguished according to the different elements of the MSFD. Legal status: generally clear information e.g. describing the legal status of the ministry or other body acting as CA. Roles and responsibilities: very variable level of information. Some MS have described in details the different responsibilities including beyond the MSFD implementation in the strict sense. Coordination amongst CAs: concern only MS which have designated several CAs reflecting a federal structure or principally different offices in the national government. Coordination within marine (sub)regions: MS refer to RSC and some mentioned further activities e.g. joint cooperation projects. Some MS refer only to bilateral cooperation. The preparation of the initial assessment The determination of GES, the establishment of targets and indicators The monitoring programme The programme of measures It should be noted that several Member States with only one CA mentioned coordination mechanisms among government ministries and other offices, and in some cases with sub-national ministries (for example in federal or semi-federal countries). This is the case, for example, in Italy, where the Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea will set up a technical committee whose members will include representatives of other ministries and of regions. Coordination amongst CAs: concern only MS which have designated several CAs reflecting a federal structure (DE, PT, UK) or principally different offices in the national government (BE, BG, FR, LT, MT, NL, RO, SI).