7-May-2007 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /270 Submission July 2003 Liang Li, Helicomm Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE r3 Submission November 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
July 2009 Slide 1 Michael McLaughlin, DecaWave IEEE f Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE −05−0393−00−004a Submission July, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Date Submitted: [18 March 2004]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
Date Submitted: [18 March 2004]
Q. Wang [USTB], B. Rolfe [BCA]
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
Submission Title: [TG4a General Framework]
July 12, 2000 doc.: IEEE <00210> March 2001
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 12, 2000 doc.: IEEE <00210> March 2001
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
June 30th, 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4a Review and Selection Criteria Date.
Submission Title: [Comment resolution for i-31]
Date Submitted: [ 25 August, 2008]
May, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Integration lengths for extended-range PHY.
May Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Channel ized, Optimum Pulse Shaped UWB PHY.
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
November 18 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Multi-Rate PHY Proposal for the.
Jan Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal for sub-GHz Interference Model] Date.
7-May-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Rate one over four code for TG4a]
March, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Integration lengths for long-range PHY Date.
March, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Integration lengths for extended-range PHY.
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
March, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
Date Submitted: [26-Oct-2005]
May, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Integration lengths for extended-range PHY.
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
Submission Title: [Codes for preamble and data]
Submission Title: [FEC Options summary for TG4a ]
Submission Title: [FEC & Modulation Options and considerations]
Submission Title: [Rate 1/4 code for TG4a]
June 30th, 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4a Pulse Modulation Review and Selection.
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Integration lengths for extended-range PHY.
May 203 doc.: IEEE r1 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
March, 2003 doc.: IEEE /127r0 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Alternate PHY.
Date Submitted: [26-Oct-2005]
Date Submitted: [March, 2007 ]
Submission Title: [Example UWB Tx Data]
Submission Title: [Uniform bandplan for TG4a Modulation]
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Intended IG Objectives] Date Submitted:
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
November, 2003 doc.: IEEE November 2003
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
7-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [FEC Multipath performance for TG4a ]
Date Submitted: [29 August 2016]
March 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY Proposal for the IEEE a standard]
Submission Title: [SFD comparison] Date Submitted: [18−July−2006]
Submission Title: [SFD comparison] Date Submitted: [18−July−2006]
9-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [SFD comparison] Date Submitted: [18−July−2006]
<author>, <company>
<author>, <company>
May 203 doc.: IEEE r2 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Presentation transcript:

7-May-2007 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY] Date Submitted: [2007-May-7th] Source: [Brian Gaffney, Michael Mc Laughlin] Company [DecaWave] Address [25 Meadowfield, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland] Voice:[+353 87 688 2514], FAX: [none], E-Mail:[michael.mclaughlin@decawave.com, brian.gaffney@decawave.com] Re: [Response to Call for Proposals 15-07-0586-02-003c-tg3c-call-proposals.doc] Abstract: [Alternative PHY Proposal for TG3c] Purpose: [To assist TG3c in selecting a mm Wave PHY] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 DecaWave 3c Proposal Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Proposal Outline Single Carrier system. 7-May-2007 Proposal Outline Single Carrier system. Adaptive Phased Antenna Array to boost SNR at receiver and provide spatial multiple access Low complexity Multi-national regulatory compliance. Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Proposed Band Plan U.S. Japan 1.6Ghz 57 59 64 66 f(Ghz) ~2.2Ghz 7-May-2007 Proposed Band Plan U.S. Japan 1.6Ghz 57 59 64 66 f(Ghz) ~2.2Ghz Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Modulation Scheme 8-QAM Allows for Non-Coherent reception 7-May-2007 Modulation Scheme 8-QAM Used in the V.29 modem standard due to resilience to phase noise. Higher bandwidth efficiency than QPSK. More resilient to phase noise and power amplifier problems than higher order constellations (16-QAM). Allows for Non-Coherent reception Only two levels Q I R1 R0 Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Error Correction Coding 7-May-2007 Error Correction Coding Outer systematic Reed Solomon block code. Inner systematic Convolutional code. Constraint length K = 5 and rate 1/3. One information bit in produces 3 bits out (the information bit and two parity bits) which are mapped to a symbol in the 8-QAM constellation. Systematic to allow for Non-Coherent Reception for low complexity receivers File Transfer and Kiosk usage scenarios Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Outer Reed Solomon The systematic Reed Solomon code is over the Galois field GF(26) and is given as RS(63,55). Input of 55 symbols creates 8 parity symbols for a rate 0.87 code. Systematic gives the option of ignoring the parity symbols in low complexity receivers. Used in the 802.15.4a standard. Interleaved output before input to inner code improves performance by separating burst errors at the receiver. Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Convolutional Code Generator Polynomial: g1=208, g2 = 278, g3 =328. + 7-May-2007 Convolutional Code + + Generator Polynomial: g1=208, g2 = 278, g3 =328. Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Convolutional Code With K=5, there are only 16 possible states. 7-May-2007 Convolutional Code With K=5, there are only 16 possible states. 8 branch metrics need to be calculated per symbol Other coding techniques, which achieve better performance, such as LDPC codes were investigated, but the convolutional code was chosen because it is easier to implement at the high data rates of interest. Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Convolutional Code Systematic code gives the option of ignoring the parity bits Important for Non-Coherent receiver. To be covered later. However, systematic codes are known to perform worse than non-systematic. We have developed the previous code in conjunction with a bit to symbol mapping which approaches the performance of a Gray coded constellation with maximum free distance non-systematic code. Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

8-QAM Constellation 001 100 101 000 010 111 110 011 7-May-2007 Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Our 8-QAM versus Gray Coded 7-May-2007 Our 8-QAM versus Gray Coded Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Data Modes Four Data Modes: Base mode 1.4Gbps 7-May-2007 Data Modes Four Data Modes: Base mode 1.4Gbps High data rate mode 2.8Gbps Very High data rate mode 4.2Gbps Low rate (67Mbps) back channel mode obtained by sending a direct sequence code Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Base Mode – 1.4Gbps Base mode Inner and Outer coding 7-May-2007 Base Mode – 1.4Gbps Base mode One bit per symbol. Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF) = Bandwidth (B) Data rate = 0.87*B Gbs Inner and Outer coding Interleave RS output Spatial multiple access Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Base Mode – 1.4Gbps Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

High Data Rate Mode – 2.8Gbps 7-May-2007 High Data Rate Mode – 2.8Gbps High Data Rate mode Two bits per symbol Punctured Base mode PRF = B Interleave RS output Data rate = 2*0.87*B Gbs Not transmitted From convolutional coder s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

High Data Rate Mode – 2.8Gbps 7-May-2007 High Data Rate Mode – 2.8Gbps Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Very High Data Rate Mode – 4.2Gbps 7-May-2007 Very High Data Rate Mode – 4.2Gbps Very High Data Rate mode No convolutional code Reed Solomon RS(63,55) Interleave RS output Data rate = 3*0.87*B Gbs Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Very High Data Rate Mode – 4.2Gbps

Low Data Rate Mode – 67Mbps 7-May-2007 Low Data Rate Mode – 67Mbps Low data rate back channel mode. Length 21 Ipatov ternary sequence. +00−++−0+0+−+++++−−0− Golay Merit Factor of 5.3 Gives the option of 67Mbs (base mode) or 133Mbs (high data mode) which is more resistant to errors Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Non Coherent Reception 7-May-2007 Non Coherent Reception The Non Coherent receiver is ideal for File Transfer or the Kiosk modes The systematic bit decides which “ring” the transmitted symbol is on. Therefore, by using a simple energy detector receiver we can decode the systematic bit from any base mode signal. The Outer Reed Solomon code then gives some optional error correcting capabilities Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Non Coherent Reception 7-May-2007 Non Coherent Reception to RS decoder from antenna LPF exp(j2πfct) Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Non Coherent Reception 7-May-2007 Non Coherent Reception Used with a directional antenna, we can achieve a data rate of 0.87*B Gbs at short range Enables a very low cost implementation Ideal for integration into media players, phones, cameras etc. Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Non Coherent Reception 7-May-2007 Non Coherent Reception Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Phased Antenna Array We propose using a phased antenna array to boost the signal to noise ratio at the receiver input and provide spatial multiple access. The phased antenna array can adapt to any direction of arrival (assuming omni directional elements) The phased antenna array offers a low complexity solution Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Phased Antenna Array + Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Phased Antenna Array For omni directional antenna elements, the phased antenna array can achieve a high gain in any given direction. For example, ten elements (uniform linear array) can give a gain of 10dBi To achieve higher gains, directive elements need to be applied which require some physical alignment of Tx and Rx The non-coherent mode could have a single highly directive element and assume the user will align the Tx and Rx Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Hidden Node Problems Major problem with directive antenna systems is finding Nodes. To combat this problem, we propose using a single element mode. For omni-directional antenna elements, we can now “see” in every direction. For directive antenna elements, we can only “see” in the direction we can adapt in. Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Hidden Node Problems However, the path loss is so high at 60Ghz, a very weak signal is received when we are not using the antenna array gain The Solution: Compensate for the lack of antenna array gain at Tx and Rx by spreading the signal to obtain an equal or higher processing gain Much lower data rate, but not so important at the start of communication Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Ternary Spreading Sequence 7-May-2007 Ternary Spreading Sequence Ipatov Sequence Perfect Periodic Autocorrelation properties. Allows for accurate channel estimation for Channel Matched Filtering (CMF) and Antenna Array adaptation. Used in 802.15.4a For example, a length 183 sequence is equivalent to an antenna array gain of approximately 22.2 dBi Many such sequences allows separate piconets to co-exist Example length 183 Ipatov Sequence: +−−−+0+−−−−−++−−+++++++−−++0+−+−+−+−−00−−+−+−++−−++−−+−0−−−++−−0−++−0−−+++−+++−−+−+−−+−+++++0−−++−−++−+−−−0+0+++0+−0−−−−−+−++−−0++++−+−−−−+++−+−+−−++−++−+0−++++−+−++++−++−+++++++−+−−+ Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Ternary Spreading Sequence 7-May-2007 Ternary Spreading Sequence Periodic Auto Correlation of Length 183 Ipatov Sequence Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Ternary Spreading Sequence 7-May-2007 Ternary Spreading Sequence With the perfect autocorrelation we can obtain an excellent estimate of the channel for the Channel Matched Filter (CMF) Send 16 times before each packet However, inter symbol interference (ISI) due to multipath in the channels without a dominant single path is not combated by the CMF Instead of equalization, we want to use the antenna to point in a direction which gives a useable channel Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Interference & susceptibility 7-May-2007 Interference & susceptibility All out of band interference filtered out. Adjacent channel interference is filtered out. However, power amplifier backoff will affect this and will be addressed fully at future meetings. Co-channel interference is avoided by spatial multiple access. Narrowband interference rejection with digital notch filter Tones can be detected at the A/D output. A simple notch filter either at the input or output of the matched filter can then remove this completely with no loss in performance (if notch is narrow enough). Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Link Budget (LOS) Parameter Low Base High Rate Very High Rate 7-May-2007 Parameter Low Base High Rate Very High Rate Non Coherent PHY-SAP Payload Bit Rate (Rb) 67Mb/s 1.4Gb/s 2.8Gb/s 4.2Gb/s Average Transmit Power 10dBm Transmit Antenna Gain 10dBi Center frequency (fc) 60GHz Path loss at 1 meter 68dB Receive Antenna Gain 0dBi Average noise power per bit -69.3dBm -82.5dBm -79.5dBm -77.7dBm Noise Figure 8dB -74.5dBm -71.5dBm -69.7dBm Minimum Eb/N0 for AWGN channel 2.75dB 5.75dB 9.5dB 21dB Shadowing link margin 1dB Implementation Loss 2dB Tolerable path loss 34.0dB 27.8dB 19.2dB 12.5dB Maximum operating range (d = 10 PL/10n,n=2) 50m 24.4m 11.2m 9.1m 4.2m Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Link Budget (NLOS) Parameter Base High Rate 7-May-2007 PHY-SAP Payload Bit Rate (Rb) 1.4Gb/s 2.8Gb/s Average Transmit Power 10dBm Transmit Antenna Gain 13dBi Center frequency (fc) 60GHz Path loss at 1 meter 68dB Receive Antenna Gain Average noise power per bit -82.5dBm -79.5dBm Noise Figure 8dB -74.5dBm -71.5dBm Minimum Eb/N0 for AWGN channel 5.75dB 9.5dB Shadowing link margin 5dB Implementation Loss 2dB Tolerable path loss 29.75dB 23.05dB Maximum operating range (d = 10 PL/10n,n=2.5) 15.5m 8.4m Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Link Budget Summary Bit Rate Channel Model Range for 10-2 PER 7-May-2007 Link Budget Summary Bit Rate Channel Model Range for 10-2 PER 67Mbps LOS 50m 1.4Gbps 24.4m 2.8Gbps 11.2m 4.2Gbps 7.7m NLOS 15.5m 8.4m Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Base Mode CM 1.3 Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Base Mode CM 2.3 (NLOS) Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 Base Mode CM 3.1 Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

7-May-2007 High Data Rate CM 1.3 Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Performance Summary Bit Rate Channel Model Range for 10-2 PER 7-May-2007 Performance Summary Bit Rate Channel Model Range for 10-2 PER 1.4Gbps CM 1.3 33m CM 2.3 10.5m CM 3.1 23.5m 2.8Gbps 14.8m Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Summary of our proposal 7-May-2007 Summary of our proposal 8-QAM modulation scheme 4 Data rates Base mode of 1.4Gps obtained with outer RS (rate 0.87) and inner convolutional (rate 1/3) coding High data rate mode of 2.8Gps obtained by puncturing base mode signal Very high data rate mode of 4.2Gps obtained by using only RS code Lower rate for back channel using Direct Sequence code Systematic code developed specifically for the 8-QAM constellation which enables a Non-coherent receiver architecture Node discovery and channel adaptation with omni directional antenna mode with spreading gain from long ternary sequence Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave

Advantages Low complexity solution 7-May-2007 Advantages Low complexity solution Constellation resilient to RF impairments Simple Non-coherent mode Ideal for low cost receiver e.g. for media player Single carrier potential common signalling mode operation More resistant to multipath Ternary sequences and omni-directional antenna mode allow easy node discovery Multi-national regulatory compliance Gaffney, Mc Laughlin, DecaWave