Stability of Calibration Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Advertisements

2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.
Adil Khan Kyungpook National university Korea-Japan Joint ScECAL Group Meeting kobe University Japan 3 rd September 2010.
Photodetector Timing Resolution Burle Micro-Channel Plate Photo Multiplier Tubes (MCP-PMTs) H. Wells Wulsin SLAC Group B Winter 2005.
EH1 (AD 1&2, IWS, OWS) PMT Jul. 30 – Aug. 20 RollingGain Calibration Summary Zhe Wang (BNL) and Qing He (Princeton) Aug. 22, 2011.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Ran my analysis software for position 1-6 from 2006 run. Same data set shown by Jerry at Vienna but my own analysis code version. Still no treatment of.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.
Detector Stability Analysis Using MoRI Data David Barnhill UCLA.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Performance of SPIROC chips in SKIROC mode
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
New Developments in Large Area THGEMs & APV Exercise INFN – Sezione di Trieste Carlos Alexandre Fernandes dos Santos 11/December/2014.
Experimental set-up Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE Multi-Channel MCP PMTs S.Korpar a,b, R.Dolenec.
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb Richard Jacobsson Zbigniew Guzik Federico Alessio TFC Team: Motivation Aims Overview of the board.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Analysis of Endstation A setup Josef Uher. Quartz bar Start counter.
September 7/04Cyclotron Development Meeting. Improvement TOF Possible TOF improvements.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Mike AlbrowSept 14 th 2006Time-of-Flight with GASTOFs im Test Beam 1 Fast Timing Counters for FP420/CMS and Test Beam Particle ID Mike Albrow, September.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Background Subtraction and Likelihood Method of Analysis: First Attempt Jose Benitez 6/26/2006.
1 Yu. Guz HCAL status 22/06/ Yu. Guz HCAL 137 Cs calibration The 3 rd run in 2011 was performed at the technical stop, May-09. Two source passages,
Hycal Energy Resolution, Timing, &Trigger Efficiency, A cumulative study. Chris Mauney.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Calo preparation for 2015 Goals: -Trigger stability -Good calibration for HLT2 processing -Improved calibration ( timing, e/gamma response) for all calo.
I.Prochazka et al,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014 European Laser Timing work progress Ivan Procházka, Josef Blažej (1), Jan Kodet (1,2) K.Ulrich Schreiber.
TTF - ECAL Plenary in CMS week ECAL Stability Contacts: Marc Dejardin, Julie Malcles (laser)
N. Saoulidou, Fermilab1 Study of the QIE Response & Calibration (Current Injection CalDet & Development of diagnostic tools for NearDet N.Saoulidou,
Pedestal Stability and Sparsification Nick Woods UNCW July 29, 2005.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
DREAM Coll. Meeting, Rome 2009F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa Template Analysis of DRS Data  Motivations  Preliminary results F. Bedeschi, R. Carosi, M. Incagli,
G. Eigen, Paris, Introduction The SiPM response is non-linear and depends on operating voltage (V-V bd ) and temperature  SiPMs need monitoring.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
High precision phase monitoring Alexandra Andersson, CERN Jonathan Sladen, CERN This work is supported by the Commission of the European Communities under.
SiW ECAL: the status before Fermilab Marcel Reinhard LLR – Ecole Polytechnique CALICE caollaboration meeting 18/03/08, Argonne.
CBM 12 th Meeting, October 14-18, 2008, Dubna Present status of the first version of NIHAM TRD-FEE analogic CHIP Vasile Catanescu and Mihai Petrovici NIHAM.
EAS Time Measurements P.K.Mohanty (On behalf of the GRAPES-3 Collaboration) 5 th Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, 14 – 16 December 2010 at CRL, Ooty.
MO/LO Performance Summary and Maintenance Plans Tomasz Plawski Jefferson Lab OPS Stay Retreat, July 15th, 2015.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
Timing and synchronisation J. Jones, A. Moss and E.W. Snedden April/May 2015.
Preliminary Analysis of the New Focusing DIRC Prototype Beam Data
PreShower Characterisations
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Overview of SuperB Particle identification, and work towards the TDR
Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillators
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
Online Monitoring : Detector and Performance check
Solving pedestal problem
Update on Noise Analysis of the DHCal Test Beam at Fermilab
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb
Analysis of FADC single-crystal data
Noise analysis of the 1m3 DHCal test beam
Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN
Simulation for Fast Focusing DIRC R&D
Toy Monte Carlo for the Chromatic Correction in the Focusing DIRC Data
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Status of Phase Feedforward Tests
Monte Carlo simulation of the DIRC prototype
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
T2K Run8 MUMON Summary.
Programs for the calibration of TOF measurement with the new pulser
Electronics for the PID
Presentation transcript:

Stability of Calibration Data Minbiao Ji 02/14/2006

Outline Motivation Method Data Overview in a Single TDC channel Throughout a day Over months Comparison between TDC channels Same TDC from same slot Different TDC, same slot Same TDC, different slots Summary and conclusion

Motivation Focusing DIRC R&D has to measure arrival time of Cherenkov photons to ~100-200ps accuracy. Need precise and stable calibration of all TDCs for beam test analysis. Data analysis has shown timing drifts, possible due to temperature variations, at the time scale of hours. Are all detectors/TDCs are affected by those drifts in the same way? Can a single detector yield a drift correction for all channels? Use calibration PiLas data in this study. Look at long-term variations of sub-set of channels on all beam and prototype detectors.

Basic Setup PiLas laser Prototype Start Counter1 Pilas pico-second laser; single photon mode; l=635nm; pulse jitter FWHM < 35ps Constant-fraction discriminator Phillips TDC 25ps/count Leading edge discriminator Phillips TDC 25ps/count Start Counter1 Quartz bars

Data in one testrun file, tdc7_9 (slot4 pad24) Tdc value(counts) entries Event time Tdc value(counts)

Method TDC values for tdc7_9 in a single calibration run, Fit with Gaussian in different Range. Compare the results from histogram and fit method. Entries Entries TDC Range (300,600) Simply take fit results: Mean(fit) Filename: ”testrun_20050806_0032_100000.root” Get date and time.

single day: slot 4, pad 24 on August 6, 2005 (tdc7_9) TDC Mean value (counts) ~5pm 10 ~7am Time/hour Min to max variation about 8 counts = 200ps. Consistent with day/night temperature variation in End Station A

Some other days, slot 4, pad 24 (tdc7_9) 08/07/2005 08/10/2005 TDC Mean value 10 TDC Mean value 10 Time/hour Time/hour 10/31/2005 11/20/2005 TDC Mean value TDC Mean value 8 7 Time/hour Time/hour

Corresponding days,Marker,slot2,pad 38 (tdc2_4) Phase reversed, small amplitude 08/07/2005 08/10/2005 TDC Mean value TDC Mean value 4 3 Time/hour Time/hour 10/31/2005 11/20/2005 TDC Mean value TDC Mean value 1.1 1.8 Time/hour Time/hour

Start counter1, pad 0_1 (tdc0_1), larger error Larger sigma(~3 times of prototype), fewer entries(~ 1/10 of prototype) 08/07/2005 08/10/2005 18 16 10/31/2005 11/14/2005 16 18

Data over months: July-November.slot4,pad24(tdc7_9) Select the run at midnight each day: testrun_2005????_00*.root Quite stable in July and August, but turns down fast after mid October 40 beamtest (counts) TDC Mean value 10

Some other channels, they act differently, the marker is most stable Slot6, pad27(tdc9_7) Slot5, pad27(tdc8_7) 50 30 Slot3, pad22(tdc6_12) The marker Slot2, pad38(tdc2_4) 50 8

startcounter1, stopped after the beamtest in November Pad 0_0 tdc0_0 50 Pad 0_1 tdc0_1 40 Pad 1_0 tdc0_2 Pad 1_1 tdc0_3 40 50

Some big jumps are discovered Slot6, pad27(tdc9_7) Slot5, pad27(tdc8_7) 50 40 160 Slot3, pad22(tdc6_12) Slot2, pad38(tdc2_4) 08/09 300 120 07/12 what happened at these jumps? 08/02

Check the data on 2005/07/12, jumps occur at all slots Slot2_pad38 Slot3_pad22 300 200 Slot4_pad24 Slot5_pad27 300 250 Elogbook: 2005-07-12 18:23:50 INFO juhe Debuging of the prototype electronics and the monitoring software during runs: testrun_20050712_1653_1000000.dat testrun_20050712_1655_1000000.dat testrun_20050712_1742_1000000.dat. 2005-07-12 18:26:29 INFO jjv Restart the system with Josef and Jose.

Check the data on 2005/07/12, Start Counter 1 no obvious jumps 15 20 Reasons that caused the jumps can be found in testbeam elogbook.

We ‘ve seen the different behaviors, now I’d like to check out if there are common behaviors among certain channels, if so, then the question is: are they slot dependent or TDC dependent or else? Same tdc in one slot Different tdc, same slot Same tdc in different slots Slot 5 tdc5 tdc8 tdc9 tdc5 Slot 5 Slot 6 Slot 3 tdc3 In order to compare, do the adjustment: Instead of tdc mean value, take the tdc shift : tdc mean – average of tdc mean

tdc3 in slot3 Slot 3 tdc3 (counts) Act quite the same

Some other slots Slot 3 tdc3 variation < 10

tdc5,tdc8 and tdc9 in slot5 (counts) Have similar shapes tdc5 tdc8

Some other Slots Slot 5 tdc5 tdc8 tdc9 variation < 20

tdc5 in slot5 and slot6 Big difference between slots Slot 5 tdc5

Same TDC in different Slots Large differences between slots

Conclusion Generally, TDC mean values vary periodically (T=1day, 200ps shift), probably due to temperature variation. TDC mean values are quite stable in a week time scale, but not so over months. TDC channels inside each slot tend to behave similarly. TDC channels act differently between different slots. So they are much more slot dependent. Start counters are not well correlated to prototype slots at first glance. Further study needed. To do: study the time stability and corrections to prototype pads in the beam test data.