Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0244r0 March 2012 Panasonic Slide 1 Experimental results of indoor path-loss in actual European houses Date:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0657r1 May 2012 Panasonic Slide 1 Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 PSDU Size For Receiver Sensitivity Power Level Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1484r4 Submission January 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
VHT Frame Padding Date: Authors: Month Year
WUR Link Budget Analysis Follow-up: Data Rates and SIG Bits Protection
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
MIMO Coding for SC PHY in 11ay
1MHz SIG Field Discussions
Tx EVM for MCS-10 in ah Date: Authors: Nov 2013
Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement
DMG Base MCS and Length Supplementary Slides
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Follow-up on Signaling Method for Data Rates
Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Maximum Input Level in OFDM Mode
Discussion of possible BCCs for WUR
doc.: IEEE <doc g>
Coexistence of ah and g in the S1G Band
NDP Transmission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
DMG Base MCS and Length Supplementary Slides
Bandwidth Indication Design for 120MHz
Bandwidth Indication Design for 120MHz
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
July 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Bit Order Issues] Date Submitted: [ “1 July,
VHT-STF for 11AC Date: Authors: Month Year
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
TIM Compression for No Buffered Unicast Traffic
Smoothing Bit and Beam-Change Indication Bit for 2MHz Preamble
MIMO Coding for SC PHY in 11ay
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Submission Title: [HRP UWB PHY enhanced mode converged consensus]
Proposed US Channelization for IEEE ah
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
VHT Frame Padding - Summary
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2019
MAC based FEC – improvement for a
Single User MCS Proposal
Orchestrator pilot signal
Discussion concerning MC-OOK and CIDs 212 and 665
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Discussion on PHY CIDs 2773 and 2775
Repetition and interleaver design for MCS0-Rep2
Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation
TGah Coexistence Assurance
4-bit CRC for 1 MHz and 2 MHz modes
MIMO phase in MU-MIMO Beamforming
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
doc.: IEEE g-Trends-in-SUN-capacity
Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence
TXOP Truncation Enhancement
Discussion concerning MC-OOK and CIDs 212 and 665
Control Trailer Clarifications
SIG-A Changes for Ranging NDP
NGV PHY Performance Results
Motion on Manchester Coding
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
Discussion of possible BCCs for WUR
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
September, 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: Sept.
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Additional SC MCSs in clause 20 (DMG PHY)
Presentation transcript:

Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g Authors: Date: 2012-05-XX Panasonic John Doe, Some Company

May 2012 Panasonic

May 2012 Abstract Propose target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g [1]. Panasonic

Background and motivation May 2012 Background and motivation Straw poll result of DCN 11-12-0244r0 at the last F2F meeting was “Do you agree that in addition to MCS0 rep2 other technique to improve link margin should to be devised and included in Spec Framework?” RESULT: YES: 28 NO: 0 ABSTAIN: 21 A comment “Link budget depends on target PER.” was received about DCN 11-12-0244r00 at IEEE802 Plenary Meeting Mar 2012. Target PER should be clarified for fair comparison to decide the above other techniques in simulation. Panasonic

Basic policy to decide target PER May 2012 Basic policy to decide target PER Target PER for 802.11ah should be equal to or better than the IEEE802.15.4g Why? Use case 1g (i.e. HEMS, BEMS) [1] is similar to one target application of IEEE802.15.4g. Devices of 11ah might not be used if 11ah devices’ performance was worse than devices of 15.4g for senor networks. Panasonic

May 2012 IEEE802.15.4g target PER A few 100 octets packet size is needed for use case 1g [1]. PER specification of IEEE802.15.4g at receiver sensitivity power level is PER < 10 % for a packet with 250 octets. 802.15.4g-2012.pdf (official version) specifies the following PER. SUN stands for Smart Utility Network Panasonic

TGah target PER for use case 1g May 2012 TGah target PER for use case 1g Target PER at receiver sensitivity level should be better or equal to the IEEE802.15.4g PER for use case 1g. Therefore, PER at receiver sensitivity level shall be less than 10% for PSDU length 250 octets for use case 1g. Panasonic

Straw Poll Do you agree that May 2012 Straw Poll Do you agree that for determining receiver sensitivity level requirements PER shall be less than 10% and PSDU length 250 octets for use case 1g? Yes: No: Abstain: Panasonic

May 2012 References [1] DCN 11-11-0457r0 Panasonic

May 2012 Annex Panasonic

Definition of SUN PHY (15.4g) May 2012 Definition of SUN PHY (15.4g) Sub-carrier modulation techniques defined by 15.4g is very close to MCSs defined by TGah. Panasonic

May 2012 FEC of 15.4g OFDM 16.2.3.4 Forward error correction (FEC) (d7P802-15-4g_Draft_Standard.pdf) The DATA field shall be coded with a convolutional encoder of coding rate R = 1/2 or 3/4, corresponding to the desired data rate. The convolutional encoder shall use the generator polynomials expressed in octal representation, g0 = 1338 and g1 = 1718, of rate R = ½, as shown in Figure 125. The convolutional encoder shall be initialized to the all zeros state before encoding the PHR and then reset to the all zeros state before encoding the PSDU. R=1/2 K = 7 FEC technique of IEEE802.15.4g when coding rate R is ½ is as same as the MCS0 defined by TGah. Difference between 15.4g and TGah is repetition technique. 15.4g: frequency domain repetition, TGah: time domain repetition Comparison with 15.4g target PER can be reasonable. Panasonic