Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Advertisements

Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Julie Fredericks Teachers Development Group.  Definition and Purpose  What is a mathematical justification and what purposes does mathematical justification.
Re-viewing the CMI Framework (Re-view: Take another look, see anew)
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
December 14, 2010 Proportionality Through Similarity and Geometry.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Unit 3: Equal or Not Key Standards
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
1 Unit 4: One-Step Equations The Georgia Performance Standards Website.
GV Middle School Mathematics Mrs. Susan Iocco December 10, 2014.
Bridging Math Practices Summer Workshop Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Day 3.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
{ Problem Solving Dr. Melanie Maxwell & Dr. Stephen Sher Pythagoras Project Common Core SMP Event July 29 – August 2, 2013 Transitioning from Teacher Problem.
13 th Annual Academic Success Institute Presented by Kirsten Sarginger Mathematics Coordinator 1 Academic Discourse in the Mathematics Classroom March.
LinearRelationships Jonathan Naka Intro to Algebra Unit Portfolio Presentation.
2014 Mathematics Institutes Grade Band: High School Algebra 1.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. Today’s Agenda Stipends SCECH’s Sign-in and out! Moodle
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
1 National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Illustrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice: Getting Started with the Practices Investigations.
Algebraic and Symbolic Reasoning
Orchestrating Mathematical Discussions: What is the Goal? Blake E. Peterson Brigham Young University Department of Mathematics Education.
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Are We Ready to Implement the Common Core Standards in Mathematics ? Katy White based on a presentation by DR. WESLEY BIRD
CII Council for Instructional Improvement San Mateo County Office of Education Friday, January 9, 2015.
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
Welcome to Common Core High School Mathematics Leadership
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
Vacaville USD October 30, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
M ATHEMATICAL P RACTICES For the Common Core. C ONNECTING THE S TANDARDS FOR M ATHEMATICAL P RACTICE TO THE S TANDARDS FOR M ATHEMATICAL C ONTENT The.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Unit 7 An Introduction to Exponential Functions 5 weeks or 25 days
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard:
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard: 8.F.A.2 Compare properties of two functions each represented in a different way (algebraically, graphically, numerically.
BC Curriculum Revisions 1968 → what 1976 → what 1984 → what + how 1994 → what + how 2003 → what + how 2008 → what + how 2015 → how + what.
MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic to explore, make connections,
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
Plenary 1. What’s important about the Math we Teach? A Focus on Big Ideas Marian Small
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
INSTITUTE for LEARNING This module was developed by DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Victoria Bill, University of Pittsburgh Institute.
Session 3 Implementing Tasks: Maintaining Fidelity Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks Reflecting on PracticePark City Mathematics Institute1.
Number Talks: A Powerful Math Instructional Practice.
Mathematical Practice Standards
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard:
What’s golden? Year 3: Day 8.
Presented by: Angela J. Williams
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
Park City Mathematics Institute
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Park City Mathematics Institute
PCMI 3 weeks 3 roles Reflecting on Practice
Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks
Reflecting on Practice: Using Inquiry to Build Thinking Classrooms
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard:
Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks
How to NOT teach Photosynthesis
Reflecting on Practice: Implementing Worthwhile Tasks
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard:
Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks
PCMI 3 weeks 3 roles Reflecting on Practice
Social Dynamics and Math Discussions:
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard:
Presentation transcript:

Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks Session 3 Implementing Tasks: Maintaining Fidelity Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

In this figure as the step changes, the _____________ also changes” Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute Peterson, 2006

Investigate With your partner, pick one of the attributes in our list and investigate how it changes. Make a conjecture and try to prove it. How would a graph, a table, and/or an equation support your conclusion? (If time, explore a 2nd or 3rd property)

As a table, decide what your lesson goal will be Possible goals: Distinguish between linear and quadratic relationships Distinguish between closed form and recursive rules for sequences Interpret numerical, algebraic and geometric representations of a mathematical concept Describe a geometric pattern by an algebraic expression Recognize a quadratic relationship and be able to find a closed form rule for the relationship Recognize and be able to describe the components of an arithmetic sequence Explain what rate of change means in different situations Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

Park City Mathematics Institute Select and Sequence As a table, keeping your learning goal in mind, select a few examples of work that you would want to have your class discuss. Sequence the work in the order in which you want the discussion to take place and be ready to defend your choice of sequence for the discussion. Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

Connections It is important to bring ideas together for students. What connections would you want students to discuss? How would you help them see those connections?

Possible mathematical connections Which changes led to linear equations and which lead to quadratic? Is there an explanation? What were the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches (symbolic vs. tables vs. graphs vs diagrams)? What is the distinction between patterns and proof? Is this important? Why or why not? Identify where it was important to “attend to precision”. Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

The 5 Practices Anticipate Monitor Select Sequence Connect Smith & Stein, 2011

Park City Mathematics Institute Consider the task we just looked at and it’s implementation. As a student, what was useful about this task? What did you like? What didn’t you like? Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

Park City Mathematics Institute Consider the task we just looked at and it’s implementation. As a teacher, what was useful to you? What did you like? What didn’t you like? What would you change? How would you change it? Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

Park City Mathematics Institute Norms!! Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

Participation quiz (PCMI, 2011) High school algebra class working on factoring. They are being graded on how well they work together on the task not on right answers. As you watch, what norms are being established to encourage discussion?

Park City Mathematics Institute With your table group What explicit norms does the teacher set for student discussion? What teacher moves enforced the norms? Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

Sociomathematical Norms - Talking About The Math Explanations consist of mathematical arguments not simply procedural summaries of the steps taken to solve the problem. Errors offer opportunities to reconceptualize a problem and explore contradictions and alternative strategies. Mathematical thinking involves understanding relations among multiple strategies. Collaborative work involves individual accountability and reaching consensus through mathematical argumentation (Kazemi, 1998). Vicki’s Norms Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

Norms for students working together Take turns Listen to others ideas Disagree with ideas not people Be respectful Helping is not the same as giving answers Confusion is part of learning Say your “becauses” I can’t do that - YET Llana Horn – Strength in Numbers

Student Engagement tinyurl.com/ishorn Park City Mathematics Institute Reflecting on Practice

Motivational Constructs Belongingness Meaningfulness Competence Accountability Autonomy Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute

Park City Mathematics Institute References Horn, I. (2012). Strength in numbers: Collaborative learning in secondary mathematics. Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Peterson, B. (2006). Linear and quadratic change: A problem from Japan. The Mathematics Teacher, 100(3). Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Smith, M., & Stein, M.(2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute