A Lagrangian Dynamic Model of Sea Ice for Data Assimilation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Computing An Adaptive Numerical Method for Multi- Scale Problems Arising in Phase-field Modelling Peter.
Advertisements

1 Discrete models for defects and their motion in crystals A. Carpio, UCM, Spain A. Carpio, UCM, Spain joint work with: L.L. Bonilla,UC3M, Spain L.L. Bonilla,UC3M,
Introduction to Data Assimilation NCEO Data-assimilation training days 5-7 July 2010 Peter Jan van Leeuwen Data Assimilation Research Center (DARC) University.
The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System:
Anti-Parallel Merging and Component Reconnection: Role in Magnetospheric Dynamics M.M Kuznetsova, M. Hesse, L. Rastaetter NASA/GSFC T. I. Gombosi University.
CHOICES FOR HURRICANE REGIONAL ENSEMBLE FORECAST (HREF) SYSTEM Zoltan Toth and Isidora Jankov.
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
A New Block Based Motion Estimation with True Region Motion Field Jozef Huska & Peter Kulla EUROCON 2007 The International Conference on “Computer as a.
Master thesis by H.C Achterberg
IDEALZED KERNEL SIMULATIONS REPORT #3 SATOSHI MITARAI UCSB F3 MEETING, 12/3/04.
A method for the assimilation of Lagrangian data C.K.R.T. Jones and L. Kuznetsov, Lefschetz Center for Dynamical Systems, Brown University K. Ide, Atmospheric.
N.E. Leonard – ASAP Progress Meeting – February 17-18, 2005 Slide 1/22 ASAP Progress Report Adaptive Sampling and Cooperative Control Naomi Ehrich Leonard.
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Fluid & Rigid Body Interaction Comp Physical Modeling Craig Bennetts April 25, 2006 Comp Physical.
1 MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Tutorial 6 FLUID KINETMATICS.
GOAL OF THIS WORK ■ To investigate larval transport in “idealized” simulations ● To describe long term & short term dispersal kernels ● Four scenarios.
Manipulator Dynamics Amirkabir University of Technology Computer Engineering & Information Technology Department.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
III Solution of pde’s using variational principles
1 Ion Optics Simulations What it is. How it’s useful. The SIMION ion optics software. –How it works. –Limitations and cautions –Demonstrations and examples.
Gradient Particle Magnetohydrodynamics and Adaptive Particle Refinement Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics Workshop Grand Challenge Problems in Computational.
The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System: Development and Application to Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E., Moore, A., H.
Sea Ice Deformation Studies and Model Development
A Hybrid Particle-Mesh Method for Viscous, Incompressible, Multiphase Flows Jie LIU, Seiichi KOSHIZUKA Yoshiaki OKA The University of Tokyo,
CDS 301 Fall, 2009 Vector Visualization Chap. 6 October 7, 2009 Jie Zhang Copyright ©
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Fluid dynamics The fluid is represented by a particle system Some particle properties are determined by taking an.
MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.
Assimilation of HF Radar Data into Coastal Wave Models NERC-funded PhD work also supervised by Clive W Anderson (University of Sheffield) Judith Wolf (Proudman.
A Unified Lagrangian Approach to Solid-Fluid Animation Richard Keiser, Bart Adams, Dominique Gasser, Paolo Bazzi, Philip Dutré, Markus Gross.
A particle-gridless hybrid methods for incompressible flows
Modelling Tsunami Waves using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) R.A. DALRYMPLE and B.D. ROGERS Department of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins University.
In collaboration with: J. S. Allen, G. D. Egbert, R. N. Miller and COAST investigators P. M. Kosro, M. D. Levine, T. Boyd, J. A. Barth, J. Moum, et al.
Human-Computer Interaction Kalman Filter Hanyang University Jong-Il Park.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Detail-Preserving Fluid Control N. Th ű rey R. Keiser M. Pauly U. R ű de SCA 2006.
FLUID PROPERTIES Independent variables SCALARS VECTORS TENSORS.
Grid or Mesh or Adaptive Procedure Fluid Dynamics is Made for This And this was developed in the Early 1970s.
1996 Eurographics Workshop Mathieu Desbrun, Marie-Paule Gascuel
Ensemble-based Assimilation of HF-Radar Surface Currents in a West Florida Shelf ROMS Nested into HYCOM and filtering of spurious surface gravity waves.
Ale with Mixed Elements 10 – 14 September 2007 Ale with Mixed Elements Ale with Mixed Elements C. Aymard, J. Flament, J.P. Perlat.
Multiscale data assimilation on 2D boundary fluxes of biological aerosols Yu Zou 1 Roger Ghanem 2 1 Department of Chemical Engineering and PACM, Princeton.
Quality of model and Error Analysis in Variational Data Assimilation François-Xavier LE DIMET Victor SHUTYAEV Université Joseph Fourier+INRIA Projet IDOPT,
The Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method.
Permanent Meanders in the California Current System and Comparison of Near- Surface Observations with OGCM Solutions Luca Centurioni (SIO-PORD) Collaborators:
Data assimilation applied to simple hydrodynamic cases in MATLAB
The California Current System from a Lagrangian Perspective Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California,
Point Based Animation of Elastic, Plastic and Melting Objects Mark Pauly Andrew Nealen Marc Alexa ETH Zürich TU Darmstadt Stanford Matthias Müller Richard.
CSE 872 Dr. Charles B. Owen Advanced Computer Graphics1 Water Computational Fluid Dynamics Volumes Lagrangian vs. Eulerian modelling Navier-Stokes equations.
The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.
Animating smoke with dynamic balance Jin-Kyung Hong Chang-Hun Kim 발표 윤종철.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course Mar 2016.
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics For Deformable Vessel Dynamics Progress Report Van Jones 2008/01/30.
Space and Time Mesoscale Analysis System — Theory and Application 2007
An T. Nguyen University of Texas, Austin
ME 7980 Cardiovascular Biofluid Mechanics
Improving the nonlinear numerical convergence of VP models with the
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
Modeling of Traffic Flow Problems
Bruce Cornuelle, Josh Willis, Dean Roemmich
Are sea ice model parameters independent of
Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter for ROMS in Indian Ocean
Gleb Panteleev (IARC) Max Yaremchuk, (NRL), Dmitri Nechaev (USM)
Lecture Rigid Body Dynamics.
Le-Thuy Tran and Martin Berzins
Lecture 25 Radial Basis Network (II)
Ensemble variance loss in transport models:
Combining the VP and EVP models to solve the sea ice momentum equation
Synthesis of Motion from Simple Animations
2. University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
CMOD Observation Operator
Sarah Dance DARC/University of Reading
Presentation transcript:

A Lagrangian Dynamic Model of Sea Ice for Data Assimilation R. Lindsay Polar Science Center University of Washington

Why Lagrangian? Displacement measurements (RGPS and buoys) are for specific Lagrangian points on the ice Assimilation can force the model ice to follow these points Model resolution can be made to vary spatially New way of looking at modelling ice may bring new insights

Outline of the Talk Description of the model Two Year Simulation Structure Numerical scheme Boundary conditions Forcings Two Year Simulation Validation against buoys Data Assimilation Kinematic Dynamic

Lagrangian Cells Defined by: [ x, y, u, v, h, A ] Position Velocity Mean Thickness Compactness (2-level model) These properties vary smoothly in a region Cells have area for weighting, but no shape…area is not conserved Initial spacing is 100 km Smoothing scale is 200 km Cells are created or merged to maintain approximately even number density

Force Balance at each Cell du/dt = fc + (twind + tcurrent + tinternal) / r twind = rair Cw G2 tcurrent = rwater Cc (uice – uwater)2 tinternal = grad( s ) s = f( grad(u), P*, e ) Viscous plastic rheology (Hibler, 1979) =

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics The interpolated value of a scalar: Ū(xo,yo) = S wi ai ui / S wi ai wi = exp( -Dri2 / L2 ) The gradient: du(xo,yo) /dx = (2 / L2 ) S wi ai ui / S wi ai wi = (xo-xi ) exp( -Dri2 / L2 )  grad(u)

SPH Neighbors s A, h, grad(u) Stress Gradients

Boundary Conditions Coast is seeded every 25 km with cells with 10-m ice, zero velocity. These are included in the deformation rate estimates An additional perpendicular repulsive force ( 1/r2 ) is added away from all coasts with a very short length scale

Integration Solve for [x, y, u, v] by integrating the time derivatives [u, v, du/dt, dv/dt] Find h and A from the growth rates and divergence Basic time step is ½ day Adaptive time stepping used for baby steps using the Fehlberg scheme, 4th and 5th order accurate, error tolerance specified, steps size reduced if needed 50 to 500 calls for the derivatives per time step (1.5 to 15 min per call) Cells added and dropped, and nearest neighbors found once per day

Forcings IABP Geostrophic winds Mean currents from Jinlun’s model Thermal growth and melt from Thorndike’s growth-rate table Initial thickness from Jinlun’s model Coast outline is from the SSMI land mask

One Two-year Trajectory

10-day Trajectories and Ice Thickness

Movie: 1997-1998 Trajectories Thickness Deformation Vorticity

Validation Against Buoys Correlation: 0.72 (0.66) (N = 12,216) RMS Error: 6.67 km/day Speed Bias: 0.59 km/day Direction Bias: 11.8 degrees

Data Assimilation Methods Cells are seeded at the initial times and positions of observed trajectories buoys or RGPS We seek to reproduce in the model the observed trajectories and extend their influence spatially. Use a two-pass process (work in progress) Kinematic or Dyanamic

Kinematic Assimilation Use a simple Kalman Filter to find the corrections for the positions of seeded cells at each time step Extend corrections to all cells at each time step with optimal interpolation Compute x, y -> then u, v, divergence, A, and h for all cells

Kalman Filter Assimilation of Displacement F = vector of first guess velocities PF = error covariance matrix Z = observed velocity over the interval Rz = observed velocity error Z’ = HF = first guess mean velocity G = F + K(Z – Z’) , new guess PF = (I - KH) PF , new error K = PHT , Kalman gain H P HT - Rz

Dynamic Assimilation For each displacement observation determine a corrective force du/dt = fc + (twind + tcurrent + tinternal) / r + Kfx,cor fx,cor = 2(Dxobs - Dxmod ) / Dt2 Extend fcor to all cells with optimal interpolation Rerun the entire model for the DA interval, including fcor

Conclusions A new fully Lagrangian dynamic model of sea ice for the entire basin has been developed. SPH estimates of the strain rate tensor Adaptive time stepping Solves for x ,y, u, v, h, A Good correspondence with buoy motion Assimilation work well under way

Work to be done Complete dynamic assimilation. Will it work? If it does, examine fcor . What can it tell us about forcings and internal stress? Implement kinematic refinement to get exact reproduction of the observed trajectories. Develop model error budget and time & space dependent error estimates. Minimize model bias in speed or direction Assimilate buoy and RGPS data for a two year period with output interpolated to a regular grid.