The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cell Therapy in CV Disease: Newest Evidence. 2 Induction of pluripotent stem cells from human fibroblasts Study Source of fibroblasts Transcription factors.
Advertisements

Volume 143, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Statistical analysis of transgene expression in pigs generated by lentiviral gene transfer. Statistical analysis of transgene expression in pigs generated.
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines from Adult Rat Cells
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors  Kazutoshi Takahashi, Shinya Yamanaka  Cell 
Chromatin Control of Developmental Dynamics and Plasticity
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Reprogramming of T Cells from Human Peripheral Blood
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Expression of GFP‐Aub transgenes in GSCs, and GSC loss phenotype in armi mutant Expression of GFP‐Aub transgenes in GSCs, and GSC loss phenotype in armi.
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Chromatin regulation upon recruitment of HOTAIR
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
A single amino acid residue guides DNA‐binding preferences of Oct4 and Oct6 POU domains A single amino acid residue guides DNA‐binding preferences of Oct4.
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
NILV‐S/MAR‐mediated transgene expression
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Reprogramming Roadblocks Are System Dependent
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
H1foo Has a Pivotal Role in Qualifying Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Model of differentiation from pluripotent stem cells to terminal dopaminergic neurons Model of differentiation from pluripotent stem cells to terminal.
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Epigenetics of Reprogramming to Induced Pluripotency
NILV‐S/MAR‐mediated transgene expression
Dnmt2 mutants show delayed immune responses and Dnmt2–EGFP relocalizes and interacts with DCV RNA during infection. Dnmt2 mutants show delayed immune responses.
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Derivation of Mouse Haploid Trophoblast Stem Cells
Influence of RdDM on DCL4 Transcript Isoform Expression.
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Global Splicing Pattern Reversion during Somatic Cell Reprogramming
Presentation transcript:

The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts On the left side, a schematic overview of Oct6 and its mutants used for iPSC generation. POUS and POUHD are shown as orange bars connected by the linker. Sites mutated to the respective Oct4 residues and Oct4 linker are denoted in green, and the mutation in the Sox–Oct interface is in black. The capacity of these constructs to generate iPSCs from MEFs is depicted as the absolute number of GFP‐positive colonies on the right. Error bars represent standard deviations of two biological replicates run in parallel.Oct4‐GFP‐positive colonies of two O6SKM iPSC lines, expanded from single colonies of pluripotent cells that were generated by the contribution of the synthetic Oct6 molecule (Oct67K,22T,LinkO4,151S). Scale bars: 250 μm.Genotyping of two O6SKM iPSC lines. Two stable lines of iPSCs generated with the Oct6, Sox2, Klf4, and c‐Myc retroviral set are positive for these four transgenes, but negative for the Oct4 transgene. OSKM iPSCs and OG2‐MEFs were used as PCR controls.Expression analysis of viral transgenes in two O6SKM iPSC lines done by qRT–PCR using specific primers. OG2‐MEFs were harvested 5 days after infection and used for comparison as a positive control.Two O6SKM iPSC lines immunostained for pluripotency markers Sox2 and Nanog. Oct4 expression was confirmed by the Oct4‐GFP transgene. DNA stained by DAPI. Scale bars: 100 μm.Bisulfite sequencing of genomic Oct4, Nanog, and Col1a1 promoter regions of O6SKM iPSCs, OSKM iPSCs, and OG2‐MEFs. White and black circles represent unmethylated and methylated CpG sites, respectively.Pairwise scatter plots comparing the global gene expression profile of O6SKM iPSCs1 with OG2 ESCs (left) and O4SK iPSCs (right). Black lines represent a twofold change in gene expression levels between the paired cell lines. On the right side of the plots, the color bar indicates scattering density. Red and green dots represent up‐ and downregulated genes, respectively. Positions of selected pluripotency‐related genes are highlighted as orange points.Hierarchical clustering of O6SKM iPSC lines with OG2 ESCs and O4SK iPSCs, illustrating the close relationship between their global gene expression profiles. Source data are available online for this figure. Stepan Jerabek et al. EMBO Rep. 2017;18:319-333 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend