CAEP Standard Four Evidence of Program Impact

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Mathematics Coaching Resources and Tools for Coaches and Leaders, K-12.

Advertisements

Zoomerang Slide Presentation Student Evaluations of Fall 2008 On-Campus Student Jobs Fair.

Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.

Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.

Office of Professional Preparation and Licensure (OPPL) Annual Report.

ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.

Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Teacher Preparation Family.

Quality in Vocational Training in relation to the SCIH project Basic Quality Measures Hargašová Oľga, Ing. SSOŠ SD Jednota Šamorín.

December 2014 Supporting Principals as Instructional Leaders.

 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.

PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.

New Teacher Development Program developing and retaining talented new teachers.

Template for the Principal’s Mid-Year Report Grass Lake High School Mathematics.

RISE Job Search Function  On the RISE Network, you can search for jobs at Partner Schools by:  geographic area  subject  grade level  Each listing.

Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.

CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Jennifer Carinci,

DASA Policy and Practice Conference June 24, 2015.

The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness December 2012 revision 1.

March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness December 2012 revision 1.

School-Based Action Research. Action Research Type of practitioner research. Type of practitioner research. Used to improve the one's practice. Used to.

The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval.

Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments OECD Teaching and Learning International Study (TALIS) Teacher evaluation Evidence from TALIS OECD.

Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.

Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.

Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.

Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.

Frazier McGuire Mount View High School Counselor.

Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.

Complex Activity of Teaching 4 domains of teaching responsibility 22 Components defining distinct aspects of the domains 2-5 elements describe specific.

Assessing Impact on P12 Learning: A Multiple Measures Approach Leslee PetersonLeslee Peterson, Assessment Coordinator Micki M CaskeyMicki M Caskey, Associate.

CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.

CAEP Standard 4: Program Impact Emerson Elliott, CAEP Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter:

Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.

S A N D I E G O U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T - H I V P R I O R I T Y 2014 School Health Profiles Report Weighted Principal Survey Results.

SACE Leadership and Quality Learning Forums Australian Professional Standards for Teachers: building professional capacities in educational assessment.

CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study

Data Driven Instructional Coaching: Feedback for Improvement

Monitoring & Evaluation Processes A A walkthrough of the whole process

Michael Kelly, Ed. D. John Gratto, Ed. D. Virginia Tech

S A N D I E G O U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

Presentation on Measuring Service Quality

Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology

Standard 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity

Beth Kubitskey, EMU Anne Tapp, SVSU

Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready

Evaluating Principals Making a Fuzzy Process More Clear

Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready

DAY 1 5. Catholic Identity Being a teacher in a Catholic School.

Linda Kraemer, Ed.D. Madeline Craig, Ed.D.

Leaders of Teachers (external to classroom)

Closing Thoughts and Reflection

How to Measure and Share your Success: Using Visit Tracker to Tell Your Story April 6, 2017 | Rachel Breck.

Shelby County Schools IMPACT Survey Results

Standard Four Program Impact

Administrator Evaluation Orientation

Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview

Your “Principal” Partnership: Communicating Library Program Success

Conducting Marketing Research

Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E

Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair

Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.

Program Review: Creative Writing

Standard 4.1 – Alumni Impact on Student Learning

Conducting Marketing Research

CAEP Performance Data 2019 Annual Report

Academic Assessment: Data Day April 27, 2016.

Follow-Up Surveys of Graduates and Employers Preparation in the Content Area

Presentation transcript:

CAEP Standard Four Evidence of Program Impact 4.1 Impact on P-12 Student Learning We will use data collected by the state that has been compiled and analyzed by the Center for Research, Evaluation, and Advancement of Teacher Education. 4.2 Indicators of Teaching Effectiveness 4.3 Satisfaction of Employers We have data from current employers gathered by Job Fair surveys, direct statements from the EPAC, and from Principal surveys. 4.4 Satisfaction of Completers We have data From state Exit Surveys, local surveys, and from CPR surveys for professional level completers