September 2004 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [MultiBand OFDM Update and Overview] Date.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0533r0 Submission September 2004 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /270 Submission July 2003 Liang Li, Helicomm Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [TG3a Performance Considerations in UWB Multi-Band] Date.
Doc.: IEEE /235r0 Submission May 2001 Philips SemiconductorsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 14, 2003 Tewfik/Saberinia, U. of MNSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [MB-OFDM waiver panel] Date Submitted: [March 2005] Revised:
Doc.: IEEE r2 Submission 11/17/2004 Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuestSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission September 2004 Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuestSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Date Submitted: [18 March 2004]
<month year> doc.: IEEE <04-106> March 2004
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
January 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [MultiBand OFDM Overview] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
September, 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Complexity and Performance Analysis.
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 January 2004
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
Date Submitted: [18 March 2004]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2014 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SRM related functions in ]
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
Submission Title: [TG4a General Framework]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: pureLiFi r1 proposal for High Speed.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Kodak - High Rate PHY Proposal]
March 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY Proposal for the IEEE a standard]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE g-Trends-in-SUN-capacity
Submission Title: [Multi-band OFDM Proposal References]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
November 18 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Multi-Rate PHY Proposal for the.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a-Wisair contribution on multi band implementation]
March, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
<month year> doc.: IEEE /244r0 May 2001
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
March, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
January 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Wisair-CFP-Response] Date Submitted: [4.
Submission Title: [Narrow Band PHY Proposal for g]
July Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [On unifying PPDU formats] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Rake Span.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
6 July, 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: FPP SUN Simulation Results – Redpine Signals.
May, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 203 doc.: IEEE r1 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
March, 2003 doc.: IEEE /127r0 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Alternate PHY.
January 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Wisair-CFP-Response] Date Submitted: [4.
Date Submitted: [March, 2007 ]
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 May, 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Ultra-Wideband.
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
<month year> doc.: IEEE <04-106> March 2004
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November, 2003 doc.: IEEE November 2003
Submission Title: IEEE Potential TG3b MAC Project
September 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group.
March 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY Proposal for the IEEE a standard]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [UWB Coexistence Issues] Date Submitted:
9-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
July 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal in Response to Task Group j.
May 203 doc.: IEEE r2 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Presentation transcript:

September 2004 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [MultiBand OFDM Update and Overview] Date Submitted: [ 12 September, 2004] Source: [Matthew B. Shoemake] Company [WiQuest Communications, Inc.] Address [8 Prestige Circle, Suite 110, Allen, Texas, USA 75002] Voice:[+1 214-547-1600], FAX: [+1 214-547-1606], E-Mail:[Matthew.Shoemake@WiQuest.com] Re: [MultiBand OFDM Proposal, doc. 15-02-268r4] Abstract: [This presentation provides an overview of the MultiBand OFDM proposal. Details of the actual proposal may be found in document 15-02-268r4. This presentation provides high level technical details of the MultiBand OFDM proposal. It attempts to communicate what MultiBand OFDM is, why key technical decision were made, how the solution functions and who key supporters of the proposal are.] Purpose: [To inform voters of the merits of MultiBand OFDM thereby allowing them to make an informed vote in the IEEE 802.15.3a technical selection procedure.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

September 2004 Introduction The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of MultiBand OFDM (doc. 15-04-0493) including Technical advantages and characteristics Identification of key supporters References to supporting material Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

Proposal Overview The MultiBand OFDM proposal: September 2004 Proposal Overview The MultiBand OFDM proposal: Is based on proven OFDM technology Used in IEEE 802.11a and 802.11g Achieves data rates of 53 to 480 Mbps Support for 4 to 16 simultaneous piconets Spectrum easily sculpted for international regulatory domain compliance Is easily extensible for future range/rate improvements Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

Frame Format PLCP Preamble PLCP Header Payload September 2004 Frame Format PHY Tail MAC Tail Pad Frame Payload Tail Pad PLCP Preamble HCS FCS Header Bits Header Bits Bits Variable Length: 0 - 4095 bytes Bits Bits PLCP Header 53.3*, 80, 110*, 160, 200*, 320, 400, 480 Mb/s 53.3 Mb/s * - Mandatory Rates PLCP Preamble Deterministic sequence Allows packet detect and piconet identification PLCP Header Encoded at 53 Mbps Contains reserved bits for future extensions Payload Coded at 53 to 480 Mbps Each frame contains multiple OFDM symbols Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

Frequency-Domain Inputs September 2004 Encoder Scrambler 64-State BCC Puncturer 3-Stage Interleaver QPSK Mapper IFFT DAC Time Frequency Kernel NULL # - 61 -2 1 2 127 126 62 63 64 67 65 66 Frequency-Domain Inputs Time-Domain Outputs D Output Data A Output Data B Output Data C Error Control Coding Standard 64-State Binary Convolutional Code Punctured to achieve various data rates IFFT 128 points 100 data, 12 pilot, 10 guard, 6 null Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

Packet at Baseband Each OFDM symbol is 312.5 ns long containing: September 2004 Packet at Baseband Each OFDM symbol is 312.5 ns long containing: - 60.6 ns null cyclic prefix - 242.4 ns of data transmission - 9.5 ns guard Number of OFDM Symbols: - Packet sync: 21 - Frame sync: 3 - Channel estimation: 6 - PLCP header: 12 - Payload: Variable (54 at left) Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

September 2004 Spectrum DAC converter rate = 528 MHz Tone width = 4.125 MHz Instantaneous Bandwidth ≈ 123 * 4.125 MHz = 511 MHz As characteristic of OFDM systems, signal rolloff is sharp yielding excellent adjacent channel interference characteristics Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

Band Groups Spectrum is divided into 14 bands September 2004 Band Groups Spectrum is divided into 14 bands Bands are spaced at 528 MHz Five band groups are defined Enables structured expansion f 3432 MHz 3960 4488 Band #1 #2 #3 Each Time Frequency Code (TFC) corresponds to a Logic Channel Logical Channels enable Simultaneously Operating Piconets (SOPS) Four SOPS are enabled on Band Group1 Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

AWGN Performance Noise Bandwidth ≈ 500 MHz Noise Floor ≈ -87 dBm September 2004 AWGN Performance Noise Bandwidth ≈ 500 MHz Noise Floor ≈ -87 dBm Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

Enhancements to Proposal September 2004 Enhancements to Proposal Changes made since July 2004: 55 Mbps changed to 53 1/3 Mbps Lower PAR Channel Estimation sequence included Mapping of data tones onto guard tones Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

Features Regulatory Robustness September 2004 Features Regulatory Meets FCC requirement for 500 MHz minimum bandwidth Maximally flexible for regulatory expansion due spectral sculpting capability Robustness Time Frequency Coding provides frequency diversity gain and robustness to interference Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

System Performance (3-band) September 2004 System Performance (3-band) The distance at which the Multi-band OFDM system can achieve a PER of 8% for a 90% link success probability is tabulated below: Includes losses due to front-end filtering, clipping at the DAC, ADC degradation, multi-path degradation, channel estimation, carrier tracking, packet acquisition, no attenuation on the guard tones, etc. Range AWGN LOS: 0 – 4 m CM1 NLOS: 0 – 4 m CM2 NLOS: 4 – 10 m CM3 RMS Delay Spread: 25 ns CM4 110 Mbps 21.4 m 12.0 m 11.5 m 10.9 m 200 Mbps 14.6 m 7.4 m 7.1 m 7.5 m 6.6 m 480 Mbps 9.3 m 3.2 m 3.0 m N/A Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

Signal Robustness/Coexistence September 2004 Signal Robustness/Coexistence Assumption: Received signal is 6 dB above sensitivity. Values listed below are the required distance or power level needed to obtain a PER  8% for a 1024 byte packet at 110 Mb/s and operating in Band Group #1. Coexistence with IEEE 802.11b and Bluetooth is relatively straightforward because they are out-of-band. Multi-band OFDM is also coexistence friendly with both GSM and WCDMA. MB-OFDM has the ability to tightly control OOB emissions. Interferer Value IEEE 802.11b @ 2.4 GHz dint  0.2 meter IEEE 802.11a @ 5.3 GHz Modulated interferer SIR  -9.0 dB Tone interferer SIR  -7.9 dB Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

PHY-SAP Throughput Assumptions: September 2004 PHY-SAP Throughput Assumptions: MPDU (MAC frame body + FCS) length is 1024 bytes. SIFS = 10 ms. MIFS = 2 ms. MPDU (MAC frame body + FCS) length is 4024 bytes. Number of frames Throughput @ 110 Mb/s Throughput @ 200 Mb/s Throughput @ 480 Mb/s 1 Mode 1: 80.4 Mb/s Mode 1: 127.3 Mb/s Mode 1: 195.6 Mb/s 5 Mode 1: 88.7 Mb/s Mode 1: 149.3 Mb/s Mode 1: 253.0 Mb/s Number of frames Throughput @ 110 Mb/s Throughput @ 200 Mb/s Throughput @ 480 Mb/s 1 Mode 1: 98.5 Mb/s Mode 1: 174.6 Mb/s Mode 1: 355.2 Mb/s 5 Mode 1: 101.4 Mb/s Mode 1: 184.1 Mb/s Mode 1: 396.8 Mb/s Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

PHY Complexity Unit manufacturing cost (selected information): September 2004 PHY Complexity Unit manufacturing cost (selected information): Process: CMOS 90 nm technology node in 2005. CMOS 90 nm production will be available from all major SC foundries by early 2004. Die size for the PHY (RF+baseband) operating in Band Group #1: Active CMOS power consumption for the PHY (RF+baseband) operating in Band Group #1 : Process Complete Analog* Complete Digital 90 nm 3.0 mm2 1.9 mm2 130 nm 3.3 mm2 3.8 mm2 * Analog Component area. Process TX (55 Mb/s) TX (110, 200 Mb/s) RX (55 Mb/s) RX (110 Mb/s) RX (200 Mb/s) 90 nm 85 mW 128 mW 147 mW 155 mW 169 mW 130 nm 104 mW 156 mW 192 mW 205 mW 227 mW Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

September 2004 MB-OFDM Support MultiBand OFDM has an unprecedented level of support and serves the needs of: Major Personal Computer manufacturers Major Mobile Phone manufacturers Major Consumer Electronics manufacturers Major Software companies Component manufacturers Test equipment manufacturers Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

MB-OFDM Advantages MB-OFDM   Piconets Supported 16 September 2004 MB-OFDM Advantages MB-OFDM Piconets Supported 16 Extendable to high rate/longer range Yes, via industry standard techniques Coding 64-State Binary Convolutional Code Regulatory Flexibility High Clear Channel Assessment Robust, Non-preamble-based Mechanism Multipath Immunity Inherent from OFDM Spectral Sculpting  Industry Support  WiMedia Support Exploits Moore’s Law Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

MB-OFDM Submissions (1 of 2) September 2004 MB-OFDM Submissions (1 of 2) MB-OFDM Update and Overview, Matthew B. Shoemake (WiQuest), doc. 15-04-0518 MB-OFDM Specification, Anuj Batra (Texas Instruments), et al., doc. 15-04-493 Market Needs for a High-Speed WPAN Specification, Robert Huang (Sony) and Mark Fidler (Hewlett Packard), doc. 15-04-0410 MB-OFDM for Mobile Handhelds, Pekka A. Ranta (Nokia), doc. 15-04-432 In-band Interference Properties of MB-OFDM, Charles Razzell (Philips), doc. 15-04-0412 Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

MB-OFDM Submissions (2 of 2) September 2004 MB-OFDM Submissions (2 of 2) Spectral Sculpting and Future-Ready UWB, David Leeper (Intel), Hirohisa Yamaguchi (TI), et al., doc. 15-04-0425 CCA Algorithm Proposal for MB-OFDM, Charles Razzell, doc. 15-04-0413 What is Fundamental?, Anuj Batra, et al., doc. 15-04-430 Time to market for MB-OFDM, Roberto Aiello (Staccato), Eric Broockman (Alereon) and David Yaish (Wisair), doc. 15-04-432 Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

Summary Inherent Multipath Capture and Immunity September 2004 Summary Inherent Multipath Capture and Immunity High Performance Error Control Range/rate extendable Spectral Sculpting for Global Expandability Superior channelization Low Cost and Power Consumption Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest

September 2004 Select References 15-03-0343, MultiBand OFDM September 2003 presentation, Anuj Batra 15-03-0449, MultiBand OFDM Physical Layer Presentation, Roberto Aiello and Anand Dabak 15-04-0010, MultiBand OFDM January 2004 Presentation, Roberto Aiello, Gadi Shor and Naiel Askar 15-04-0013, C-Band Satellite Interference Measurements TDK RF Test Range, Evan Green, Gerald Rogerson and Bud Nation 15-04-0017, Coexistence MultiBand OFDM and IEEE 802.11a Interference Measurements, Dave Magee, Mike DiRenzo, Jaiganesh Balakrishnan, Anuj Batra 15-04-0018, Video of MB-OFDM, DS-UWB and AWGN Interference Test, Pat Carson and Evan Green Matthew B. Shoemake, WiQuest