Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Advertisements

Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Structure of Bacteriophage T4 RNase H, a 5′ to 3′ RNA–DNA and DNA–DNA Exonuclease with Sequence Similarity to the RAD2 Family of Eukaryotic Proteins 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
Rahul C. Deo, Caroline M. Groft, K.R. Rajashankar, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Core Structure of gp41 from the HIV Envelope Glycoprotein
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Crystal Structure of Carnitine Acetyltransferase and Implications for the Catalytic Mechanism and Fatty Acid Transport  Gerwald Jogl, Liang Tong  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton, Günter Blobel, John Kuriyan  Cell  Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 193-204 (July 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81419-1

Figure 1 Primary and Secondary Structure of Yeast Karyopherin α (A) Schematic of the domain structure, with sequence numbering of the conserved N-terminal domain (residues 17–57) and the large arm-repeat domain (residues 88–530). The locations of the cleavage sites that produce a stable product by subtilisin treatment are shown by numbered arrows. The green portion represents the molecular limits of the construct used for structure determination. The arm repeats are numbered 1–10. (B) Structure-based sequence alignment of the ten arm motifs in yeast Kapα. The residue numbers at the beginning and the end of each repeat are indicated. The top line illustrates the structural elements of the repeat: helices H1, H2, and H3. The consensus shown at the bottom is from the analysis of arm repeats in β-catenin (Huber et al. 1997) and specifies the position of the hydrophobic core residues that are characteristic of arm motifs. The amino acids that are strictly conserved in 13 karyopherin α sequences are shaded in orange. Cell 1998 94, 193-204DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81419-1)

Figure 2 Three-Dimensional Structure of Kapα50 The molecule contains ten tandem arm repeats, which are shown in different colors. With the exception of the first motif, each arm repeat includes three α helices (H1, H2, and H3). The superhelical axis of the molecule is vertical. All ribbon diagrams were generated using RIBBONS (Carson 1991). Cell 1998 94, 193-204DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81419-1)

Figure 3 Conservation of the Molecular Surface of Kapα50 The molecular surface is shown in three views (a, b, and c), related by successive 90° rotations about the superhelical axis. In view a, the molecule has a similar orientation as in Figure 2, with the N terminus at the bottom and the C terminus at the top. The coloring scheme represents the level of amino acid similarity observed on aligning 13 sequences of karyopherin α. The colors range from 0% (white) to 100% (orange) sequence identity. Amino acid residues were each assigned a parameter as a measure of the degree of conservation (P. Brick, unpublished); the parameter values were mapped onto a color scale and displayed on the surface of the molecule using GRASP (Nicholls et al. 1991). Cell 1998 94, 193-204DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81419-1)

Figure 4 Stereo View of Kapα50 with the SV40 T Antigen NLS Peptide Bound at Two Sites Stereo drawing of a ribbon representation of Kapα50 shown in a similar orientation to view b in Figure 3. Highlighted in orange is the ridge of conserved residues presented by the H3 helices, which spirals about the superhelical axis, forming the floor of the surface groove. The SV40 T antigen peptides (blue) bind at a larger (below) and a smaller (above) site in the conserved groove. Cell 1998 94, 193-204DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81419-1)

Figure 5 Specificity of NLS Binding to Karyopherin α (A) Schematic representation showing the position of the two SV40 T antigen peptides (in blue) within the ridge of conserved Trp and Asn residues. In red are negatively charged and polar residues, while helix dipoles are shown as rectangles. Six side chains of the NLS are visible at the larger binding site (denoted P1 to P6), while only two are recognized at the minor site (P1′ and P2′). The peptide binds at the Trp-Asn pairs of arm2, arm3, and arm4 (153–157, 195–199, and 237–241) at the larger binding site and of arm7 and arm8 (363–367 and 405–409) at the smaller site. The regular array of Trp-Asn pairs is interrupted at the fifth and sixth arm motifs by Tyr-283 and Arg-321. The conserved pairs are colored per arm repeat (as in Figure 2). (B) Interactions of the SV40 T antigen NLS peptide at the larger N-terminal site of Kapα50. The peptide is shown in blue, with residues 127–132 denoted P1 to P6. The asparagine and tryptophan residues of the protein are in yellow, while polar and acidic residues are in red. Water molecules are represented as red spheres. The backbone of Kapα is shown in gray, together with two protein side chains that, though not engaged in direct recognition of the peptide, are involved in proper structuring of the binding site. Polar and electrostatic interactions are indicated with dotted lines. (C) Molecular surface of the Kapa50 larger binding site colored according to electrostatic potential, with the bound SV40 T antigen peptide. The molecule is shown in a view similar to Figure 5B. The surface was generated with GRASP (Nicholls et al. 1991) using dielectric constants of 2.0 for the protein interior and 80.0 for solvent at an ionic strength equivalent to 0.1 M monovalent salt. Regions of positive charge on the surface of Kapα50 appear blue, electronegative regions are red, with neutral regions colored white. The location of several residues labeled in Figure 5B are indicated. (D) Interactions at the smaller binding site. The peptide is in blue, with the two bound side chains labeled P1′ and P2′. The ribbon representation of the molecule is in gray, and residues at the binding site are colored as in Figure 5B. Cell 1998 94, 193-204DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81419-1)

Figure 6 The Kapα50 Dimer in the Crystals (A) Dimer of Kapα50 viewed approximately down the local molecular dyad axis, with the two monomers colored in green and magenta. The arm repeats are numbered sequentially from the N to the C terminus. The helices of the tenth arm motifs are labeled. Note that the first arm repeat lacks the H1 helix. (B) The dimer interactions between the tenth arm repeat of one monomer (in gray with relevant residues depicted in magenta) contacting the H3 helices of the central repeats of the second monomer (in gray with important residues highlighted in green). All the labeled side chains are highly conserved. Hydrogen bonding contacts are shown in dotted lines. Cell 1998 94, 193-204DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81419-1)

Figure 7 Refined Model of the SV40 T Antigen Signal Peptide at the Larger Binding Site and Electron Density from a Simulated Annealing Omit Map The peptide was deleted from the model, and ten independent simulated annealing refinements were used to remove bias from the calculated phases, which were obtained by averaging the structure factors calculated from the ten resulting structures. The map was calculated using all data between 30 and 2.8 Å resolution and contoured at 2.0 σ (white) and 3.0 σ (yellow). Cell 1998 94, 193-204DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81419-1)