RELIABILITY Reliability is -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operation & Maintenance Engineering Detailed activity description
Advertisements

Reliability Engineering (Rekayasa Keandalan)
Pearson Education Ltd. Naki Kouyioumtzis
RELIABILITY Dr. Ron Lembke SCM 352. Reliability Ability to perform its intended function under a prescribed set of conditions Probability product will.
Software Quality Assurance (SQA). Recap SQA goal, attributes and metrics SQA plan Formal Technical Review (FTR) Statistical SQA – Six Sigma – Identifying.
SMJ 4812 Project Mgmt and Maintenance Eng.
Reliability Engineering and Maintenance The growth in unit sizes of equipment in most industries with the result that the consequence of failure has become.
Overview Lesson 10,11 - Software Quality Assurance
Failure Patterns Many failure-causing mechanisms give rise to measured distributions of times-to-failure which approximate quite closely to probability.
Chapter 12 Design for Six Sigma
CSE 221: Probabilistic Analysis of Computer Systems Topics covered: Exponential distribution Reliability and failure rate (Sec )
Chapter 12 Design for Six Sigma.
1 Fundamentals of Reliability Engineering and Applications Dr. E. A. Elsayed Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Rutgers University
1 Review Definition: Reliability is the probability that a component or system will perform a required function for a given period of time when used under.
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 13 Reliability.
Reliability Chapter 4S.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Developing Successful Products Brandon Burton Greg Zankowsky Melina Blundetto.
1 Product Reliability Chris Nabavi BSc SMIEEE © 2006 PCE Systems Ltd.
Project & Quality Management Quality Management Reliability.
Chapter 36 Quality Engineering Part 2 (Review) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Summer A, 2012.
On Model Validation Techniques Alex Karagrigoriou University of Cyprus "Quality - Theory and Practice”, ORT Braude College of Engineering, Karmiel, May.
Reliability Engineering
WHAT IS SYSTEM SAFETY? The field of safety analysis in which systems are evaluated using a number of different techniques to improve safety. There are.
1 Logistics Systems Engineering Reliability Fundamentals NTU SY-521-N SMU SYS 7340 Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow.
Reliability Management Benbow and Broome (Ch 1, 2, and 3)
Lean Six Sigma: Process Improvement Tools and Techniques Donna C. Summers © 2011 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved.
Lecture: Reliability & FMECA Lecturer: Dr. Dave Olwell Dr. Cliff Whitcomb, CSEP System Suitability.
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan The current qualification and verification.
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 1 Chapter 12 Design for Six Sigma.
RCM Tools Histogram Pareto Chart Cause and Effect Diagram FMEA.
EML EML 4550: Engineering Design Methods Probability and Statistics in Engineering Design: Reliability Class Notes Hyman: Chapter 5.
Reliability Failure rates Reliability
Failures and Reliability Adam Adgar School of Computing and Technology.
Reliability McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Unit-3 Reliability concepts Presented by N.Vigneshwari.
Maintainance and Reliability Pertemuan 26 Mata kuliah: J Manajemen Operasional Tahun: 2010.
Reliability Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
RELIABILITY Dr. Ron Lembke SCM 352. Uncertainty? What is it? How do you prepare for it? Known unknowns? Unknown unknowns?
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 38 – Software Quality Assurance.
CS203 – Advanced Computer Architecture Dependability & Reliability.
THE MANAGEMENT & CONTROL OF QUALITY, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 1 Chapter 12 Design for Six Sigma The Management & Control of Quality,
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
PRODUCT RELIABILITY ASPECT RELIABILITY ENGG COVERS:- RELIABILITY MAINTAINABILITY AVAILABILITY.
Module 13 Reliability 1. Key Dimensions of Quality Performance – primary operating characteristics Features – “bells and whistles” Reliability – probability.
© 2016 Minitab, Inc. Reliability for Your Company's Survival Bonnie Stone, Minitab October 19,
1 Chapter 8 Design for Six Sigma. Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) represents a set of tools and methodologies used in product development for ensuring that.
Process engineering Quality controls.
LOG 211 Supportability Analysis “Reliability 101”
36.3 Inspection to Control Quality
CHAPTER 4s Reliability Operations Management, Eighth Edition, by William J. Stevenson Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Software Quality Assurance
Most people will have some concept of what reliability is from everyday life, for example, people may discuss how reliable their washing machine has been.
Software Reliability PPT BY:Dr. R. Mall 7/5/2018.
FMEA.
PSU-Lab: A valuable expertise shared and open to CERN users
TIME TO FAILURE AND ITS PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
GE 6757 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Reliability Failure rates Reliability
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan Robustness Diagram Trends and Challenges.
RAM XI Training Summit October 2018
Reliability.
T305: Digital Communications
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 13 Reliability.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Production and Operations Management
Definitions Cumulative time to failure (T): Mean life:
Presentation transcript:

RELIABILITY Reliability is - the ability to continue to be fit for purpose or function.

Assure reliability by: Use proven designs. Use the most simple design possible i.e. few components with simple designs. Use components with a known or high probability of survival.

Assure reliability by: Employ redundant parts where there is a likelihood of failure. Design to 'fail safe'. Specify proven and capable methods of manufacture.

Failure. Types of Failure: Total failure - results in the complete loss of ability to perform the required task. Partial failure - results in the task not performing to expectations.

Types of Failure cont. Gradual failure - progressive failure over a period of time, could and should be expected and discovered by examination / inspection. Sudden failure - unexpected failure, not easily detected by examination / inspection.

Causes of Failure: Weakness inherent in the product or component when subject to the normal stresses of use. May be due to poor design, choice of materials, poor manufacturing performance or incapable machines / processes.

Causes of Failure: Misuse the application of stresses that are outside the usual capability of the product or component.

FMECA Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis FMECA is used to determine the features of product or component design and the manufacturing processes or operations that are critical to the various modes of failure.

FMECA FMECA uses all available expertise and experience from: marketing, design, technology, purchasing, production, distribution, service, etc..... and customer feedback, to identify the importance levels or criticality of potential problems and to stimulate action which will reduce these levels.

The elements of the analysis Failure Mode - How will it fail ? Considers the anticipated operating conditions used to study the most probable failure mode.

The elements of the analysis Failure Effect - What will happen ? potential failures are studied to determine the probable effect on the performance of the whole product or service and the effects of the various components on each other.

The elements of the analysis Failure Criticality - How serious ? potential failures in each part of the product or service are studied to determine the severity of each failure effect; in terms of lowering performance, safety, total loss of function, etc...

The elements of the analysis FMECA uses a simple rating system (1 - 10) for each potential failure which could occur in a product, component or service.

The elements of the analysis Each potential failure is rated with regard to: P probability of each failure occurring (1=low, 10 =high) S seriousness or criticality of the failure (1=low, 10=high) D difficulty of detecting the failure (1=low, 10=high) C criticality, C = P x S x D

FMECA Method 1. Identify all components. 2. List all failure modes for each component. 3. List failure effects for each failure mode. 4. List causes of each failure. 5. Assess failures in terms of P, S, & D. 6. Calculate the criticality, C, for each failure. 7. Rank all failures in terms of C. 8. Indicate Corrective Action for each failure.

FMECA Analysis Analysis headings.

Example - Anti-Roll Bar

Part FMECA for Anti-Roll Bar

Measures of Reliability A number of measures of reliability exist. Four of the most common follow.

Measures of Reliability R(t) The reliability, in terms of the probability of a product to still function after time t. Number surviving at time t R(t) = ------------------------------------ Number that existed at time = 0

Measures of Reliability F(t) The cumulative distribution of failure. Cumulative number of failures by time t F(t) = -------------------------------------------- Number that existed at t=0

Measures of Reliability f(t) The probability density of Failure. Number failing in unit time at time t f(t) = -------------------------------------------- Number that existed at time t = 0

Measures of Reliability (t) The Failure or Hazard rate. Number failing in unit time at t (t) = ------------------------------------------ Number surviving at time t

Life table for 150 light bulbs Operating Period (Months) Number operating at start of period 0 - 1 150 1 - 2 123 2 – 3 108 3 - 4 99 4 - 5 91 5 - 6 84 6 - 7 78 7 - 8 74 8 - 9 69 9 -10 65 10 -11 60 11 -12 57 12 -13 54 13 -14 51 14 -15 49 15 -16 47 16 -17 44 17 -18 42 18 -19 40 Operating Period (Months) Number operating at start of period 19 -20 38 20 -21 35 21 -22 32 22 -23 29 23 -24 26 24 -25 24 25 -26 22 26 -27 20 27 -28 17 28 -29 15 29 -30 13 Calculate values for R(t), F(t), f(t) and (t) for each month between 0 & 30.

R(t) and F(t) Curves

f(t) and (t) Curves

(t) - Smoothed Bath Tub Curve

The bath-tub curve. The bath-tub curve can be considered to have three distinct parts: 1. The ‘infant’ or early failure phase, (failure rate decreases rapidly). 2. The ‘adult’ or ‘useful life’ phase, (failure rate is almost constant). 3. The ‘ageing’ or ‘wear out’ phase, (failure rate increases).

Manufacturers strategy. 1. The ‘infant’ phase should be as short as possible. Manufacturers should understand how long this period is. Manufacturers should ensure that the ‘test’, ‘burn-in’, ‘run-in’ or ‘load’ period for the product should encompass this phase if possible.

Manufacturers strategy. 2. The ‘adult’ phase should be long enough to meet the customer’s expectation of reliability. This period exhibits a constant value of failure rate for the useful life of the product (or component). Manufacturers will quote ‘failure rates’ for this period only. Warranty, or Guarantee, periods are normally determined with reference to this phase.

Manufacturers strategy. 3. The ‘ageing’ phase gives an indication to the manufacturer (or supplier) of the product as to when service, repair or replacement is likely to be required. This information can be used in forecasting future demand on spares production, service engineering resources and increased manufacturing requirements.

Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF). The MTBF figure quoted for a product is the reciprocal of the constant failure rate. Evaluation time period MTBF = --------------------------------------------- Number of failure in the time period

Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF). For example: If during a period of 10 months 25 of the 150 light bulbs fail the MTBF for the light bulbs will be; 10 months MTBF = ------------------------- 25 failures = 0.4 months (or 2.5 failures per month)