Heterochromatin Formation in Mammalian Cells

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
Advertisements

Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Yingqun Huang, Renata Gattoni, James Stévenin, Joan A. Steitz 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (May 1997)
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
The Nuclear Hat1p/Hat2p Complex
The Spinal Muscular Atrophy Disease Gene Product, SMN, and Its Associated Protein SIP1 Are in a Complex with Spliceosomal snRNP Proteins  Qing Liu, Utz.
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
WNK1 Phosphorylates Synaptotagmin 2 and Modulates Its Membrane Binding
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
The TBN Protein, which Is Essential for Early Embryonic Mouse Development, Is an Inducible TAFII Implicated In Adipogenesis  Mohamed Guermah, Kai Ge,
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages (December 2001)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of Skeletal Myogenesis by Association of the MEF2 Transcription Factor with Class II Histone Deacetylases  Jianrong Lu, Timothy A. McKinsey,
Heterochromatin Dynamics in Mouse Cells
The TAFII250 Subunit of TFIID Has Histone Acetyltransferase Activity
Volume 121, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Claspin, a Novel Protein Required for the Activation of Chk1 during a DNA Replication Checkpoint Response in Xenopus Egg Extracts  Akiko Kumagai, William.
Histone–GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells  Teru Kanda, Kevin F. Sullivan, Geoffrey M. Wahl 
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Silva H Hanissian, Raif S Geha  Immunity 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
George Simos, Anke Sauer, Franco Fasiolo, Eduard C Hurt  Molecular Cell 
Christy J. Fryer, J.Brandon White, Katherine A. Jones  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Alain Verreault, Paul D. Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman 
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Heterochromatin Formation in Mammalian Cells Anders Lade Nielsen, Mustapha Oulad-Abdelghani, José A Ortiz, Eumorphia Remboutsika, Pierre Chambon, Régine Losson  Molecular Cell  Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 729-739 (April 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00218-0

Figure 1 Nuclear Localization of Endogenous and FLAG-Tagged HP1 Porteins Interphase cells from the parental P19 EC cell line [P19 (wt)] or from the three distinct FLAG-tagged HP1-expressing P19 EC-derived cell lines [P19 (f:HP1α); P19 (f:HP1β), and P19(f:HP1γ)] were analyzed by indirect immunocytofluoresence. (A) through (H) show the Hoechst DNA staining. (I) through (P) correspond to immunodetection with specific mAbs, as indicated. A mouse IgG fraction was used as negative control in (I) Molecular Cell 2001 7, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00218-0)

Figure 2 Mouse HP1α, -β, and -γ Homo- and Heteromerize In Vivo as Well as In Vitro (A and B) FLAG-tagged HP1 proteins (f:HP1s) are associated with endogenous TIF1β (A) and HP1 (B) proteins. Nuclear extracts from the parental P19 EC (wt) cell line (control) or from each of the three P19 EC-derived cell lines that express the tagged proteins (f:HP1α, f:HP1β, and f:HP1γ) were analyzed by Western blotting either directly (Input) or following immunoprecipitation with the M2 anti-FLAG antibody (FLAG IP). Western blots were probed with mAbs against TIF1β (A) and HP1α, HP1β, or HP1γ (B). In all panels, the input corresponds to one twentieth of the amount of nuclear extract used for immunoprecipitation. (C–E) All three HP1s self-associate and bind directly to each other in vitro. Purified His-HP1α (C), His-HP1β (D), or His-HP1γ (E) was incubated in a batch assay with control GST (lane 2) or GST-HP1s (lanes 3 to 5). Bound His-HP1 was detected by Western blotting. Lane 1 shows one tenth of the amount of input His-HP1 Molecular Cell 2001 7, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00218-0)

Figure 3 HP1α, -β, and -γ Are Associated with Core Histones In Vivo and Interact with Tailed and Tailless Nucleosomes In Vitro (A) Detection of core histones in f:HP1 immunoprecipitates. Nuclear extracts prepared from either the parental P19 (wt) EC cell line (control, lane 1) or each of the three distinct tagged cell lines (f:HP1α, -β, and -γ, lanes 2–4) were immunoprecipitated with the M2 anti-FLAG antibody (FLAG IP). After washing, immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted with the FLAG peptide and analyzed by SDS–PAGE, followed by silver staining. A mixture of purified core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 from calf thymus was run in parallel (lane 5). The position and migration of each of the core histones are indicated. (B) Sucrose gradient fractionation of nucleosomal core particles. Purified nuclei of P19 (wt) EC cells were partially digested with MNase, and the resulting oligonucleosomes were fractionated on a sucrose. The DNA content of the individual fractions was analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Lane L, DNA from the sucrose gradient load; lane M, molecular weight markers (100 bp ladder). Lengths in base pairs are indicated on the right. (C and D) HP1 proteins interact with mono- and oligonucleosomes in vitro. Fractions highly enriched in mononucleosomes (F3, [C]) and oligonucleosomes (F6, [D]) were incubated in a batch assay with control GST (lane 2) or GST-HP1 (lanes 3–5). Bound nucleosomes were visualized by Western blotting with the anti-H2B mouse antibody LG11. Lane 1 shows one tenth of the amount of input nucleosomal particles. (E) HP1α can bind to mononucleosomes with trypsin-cleaved N termini. Mononucleosomes from fraction F3 prior to trypsinization (+ Tails) or after trypsinization (− Tails) were incubated in a batch assay with GST (lanes 2 and 6), GST-HP1α (lanes 3 and 7), or GST-HP1αV22M (lanes 4 and 8). Bound nucleosomes were detected by SDS–PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. Lanes 1 and 5 show one tenth of the amount of input nucleosomal particles Molecular Cell 2001 7, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00218-0)

Figure 4 Direct Interaction between all Three HP1s and Histone H3 and between HP1α and Histone H1 (A–F) Far Western blot analysis of the interactions between HP1s and histones. In (A), GST-HP1 proteins that had been phosphorylated with [32P]ATP in vitro were analyzed by SDS–PAGE and autoradiography. In (B) through (F), equal amounts of purified calf thymus histones (2 μg of each) and 10 μg of a chromatin fraction prepared from P19 (wt) EC nuclei as described in the Experimental Procedures were electrophoresed on SDS–PAGE gels. In (B), the resolved histones were visualized by silver staining. In (C) through (F), the gels were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose filters and probed with 32P-labeled GST (C) or with 32P-labeled GST-HP1 fusion proteins (D–F) as indicated. 32P probe localization was performed by autoradiography. The positions of the histones are indicated. (G and H) GST pulldown analysis. Purified calf thymus histones H3 (G) and H1 (H) were incubated in a batch assay with control GST (lane 2), GST-HP1α (lane 3), GST-HP1β (lane 4), GST-HP1γ (lane 5), or GST-dHP1 containing Drosophila HP1 (lane 6). Bound histones were detected by Western blotting using the anti-histone mAb MAB052. Lane 1 shows one tenth of the amount of input histones Molecular Cell 2001 7, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00218-0)

Figure 5 Direct Binding of the HP1 Proteins to the Histone-Fold Domain of H3 (A) Schematic representation of histone H3. The acetylable lysines in the tail domain of H3 are indicated. Numbers refer to amino acid positions in the protein. (B–D) Residues 48–135 of H3 mediate interaction with HP1s. Full-length recombinant mouse His epitope B10–tagged H3 (r-H3, [B]) and two deletion mutants [r-H3(1–66), (C), and r-H3(48–136), (D)], all three purified from E. coli, were incubated in a batch assay with control GST (lanes 2) or GST-HP1 (lanes 3–5). Bound H3 was detected by Western blotting using the B10 antibody. Input lanes contain the equivalent of one tenth of the input protein used in each pulldown assay Molecular Cell 2001 7, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00218-0)

Figure 6 Separate Domains of HP1α Mediate Self-Association and Histone Binding (A) Schematic representation of the various GST-HP1α deletion mutants used in the Far Western blot experiment, with amino acid numbers below both ends; mutants that scored positive or negative for binding to HP1α, H1, and H3 are indicated on the right by plus or minus signs, respectively. (B–G) Mapping of the domains in HP1α required for interaction with HP1α, H1, and H3 by Far Western blot analysis. Increasing amounts (1 and 5 μg) of purified His-tagged HP1α (lanes 1and 2), calf thymus H1 lanes 3 and 4), and H3 (lanes 5 and 6) were electrophoresed on SDS–PAGE gels and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose filters. The replica filters were probed with 32P-labeled GST (B) or with different 32P-labeled GST-HP1α deletion derivatives (C–G) as indicated. 32P probe localization was performed by autoradiography. The positions of HP1α, H1, and H3 are indicated Molecular Cell 2001 7, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00218-0)

Figure 7 HP1α and Pc1/M33 CDs Are Necessary and Sufficient for H3 Binding (A) Amino acid alignment of the CDs. The sequences were aligned using the Clustal W program. Secondary structure elements shown were derived from mouse HP1β CD (Ball et al., 1997). Numbers refer to amino acid positions in the corresponding proteins. Invariant residues are highlighted in black. Conserved residues are shaded. The box encloses the structured part of the CDs. Mutations described in this paper are indicated below the alignment. (B and C) Both HP1α and Pc1/M33 CDs bind to histone H3. Purified calf thymus H3 was incubated in a batch assay with control GST (lane 2) or with different GST fusion proteins immobilized on glutathione S-sepharose beads. Bound H3 was detected by Western blotting using the mAb MAB052. Input lane 1 shows the equivalent of one tenth of the input protein used in each pulldown assay. (D) HP1α and Pc1/M33 bind to H3 in a CD integrity-dependent manner. Binding assays were done as in (B) with wild type and CD mutants for HP1α and Pc1/M33. (E) The CD of HP1α is required for interaction with the histones in mammalian cells. Nuclear extracts from P19 EC cells transfected with 10 μg of expression vector for unfused FLAG (control) or FLAG-HP1α mutant proteins were used for immunoprecipitation with the M2 anti-FLAG antibody. Nuclear extracts (Input) and immunocomplexes (IP) were analyzed by Western blotting using the anti-H2B antibody LG11. Inputs correspond to one two hundredth of the amount of nuclear extracts used for immunoprecipitation Molecular Cell 2001 7, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00218-0)