Box5 Calibration Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1441r0 Submission Simulation Setting of Box5 Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies) Nov 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1392r3 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
OFDMA performance in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
11ax PAR Verification using UL MU-MIMO
TGax SLS MAC Calibration Test 4 Results
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Simulation results for
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation Results for Box5
MAC Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
Simulation Results of Box5
Reference Simulation Model for Dynamic CCA / DSC Calibration
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
MAC Calibration Results
MAC Calibration Results
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Simulation Results of Box5
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Power Save Simulation Results
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Simulation results for
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Simulation results for
OBSS Preamble Detection
Simulation Results for Box5
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
Simulation Results of Box5
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box 5 Calibration Result
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Simulation results for
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Simulation results for
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
DSC Calibration Result
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Simulation results for
Consideration on System Level Simulation
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

Box5 Calibration Results Sept 2014 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr1 Jan 2015 Box5 Calibration Results Date: 2015-01-12 Authors: HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT John Doe, Some Company

Jan 2015 Abstract This presentation shows the aligned Box5 results of the simplest one-BSS case got individually by four companies based on the agreements in [1]. HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT

Calibration Scenario - 11ac Scenario 6 [2] Jan 2015 Calibration Scenario - 11ac Scenario 6 [2] Fixed Location and Association STA1 (5,-9.5) STA2 (3.5,7.5) STA4 (-4.5,0.5) STA5 (-1.5,6) STA7 (-9,-5) STA8 (-8.5,8.5) STA10 (-3,0.5) STA11 (-0.5,8) STA13 (-4,-4) STA14 (7.5,-1) STA16 (8,-6) STA17 (0,-7.5) STA19 (-2.5,-4.5) STA20 (0.5,-2) STA22 (0,-4.5) STA23 (-1.5,7) STA25 (3.5,-5) STA26 (9,9.5) STA28 (-8,-5.5) STA29 (1.5,3.5) AP A (0,0) AP B (40,20) AP C (-40,-20) STA3 (7.5+xb, ‑9.5+yb) STA9 (7+xb, -7.5+yb) STA15 (3+xb, -0.5+yb) STA21 (-6.5+xb, -3+yb) STA27 (‑6+xb, 2.5+yb) STA6 (-5.5+xc,4.5+yc) STA12 (7+xc,7+yc) STA18 (10+xc,0.5+yc) STA24 (3+xc,2.5+yc) STA30 (9.5+xc,3.5+yc) HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT

PHY Parameters Jan 2015 PHY parameters HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT BW All BSSs at 5GHz [80 MHz, no dynamic bandwidth] Channel model TGac D NLOS per link Shadow fading iid log-normal shadowing (5 dB standard deviation) per link Data Preamble Type [5GHz, 11ac], duration is considered. STA TX Power 15 dBm per antenna  AP TX Power 20 dBm  per antenna AP number of TX/RX antennas 1/1 STA number of TX /RX antennas AP antenna gain 0 dBi STA antenna gain -2 dBi Noise Figure 7dB CCA threshold -70dBm/80MHz (measured after large-scale fading) Rx sensitivity -82dBm/80MHz (a packet with lower rx power is dropped) Link Adaption Fixed MCS =7 Channel estimation ideal PHY abstraction RBIR, BCC [3, 4] Channel correlation Same as defined in the used channel model HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT

MAC Parameters Jan 2015 MAC parameters Access protocol [EDCA, AC_BE with default parameters] [CWmin = 15, CWmax = 1023, AIFSn=3 ] Queue length A single queue for each traffic link is set inside AP/STA sized of 2000 packets Traffic type UDP CBR with rate 10^8bps MPDU size 1540 Bytes (1472 Data + 28 IP header + 40 MAC header) Aggregation [A-MPDU / max aggregation size / BA window size, No A-MSDU, with immediate BA], Max aggregation: 64 MPDUs with 4-byte MPDU delimiter Max number of retries 10 Beacon Disabled RTS/CTS OFF Traffic direction DL Only, UL only Throughput metric Histogram of per non-AP STA throughput (received bits/overall simulation time)  [ *Please refer to [1] for more info about how to model these parameters. HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT

Traffic Flow Model DL/UL traffic assigned for each STA [2] Jan 2015 Sept 2014 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr1 Jan 2015 Traffic Flow Model DL/UL traffic assigned for each STA [2] STA DL UL STA1 y STA23 n STA2 STA25 STA4 STA26 STA5 STA28 STA7 STA29 STA8 STA3 STA10 STA9 STA11 STA15 STA13 STA21 STA14 STA27 STA16 STA6 STA17 STA12 STA19 STA18 STA20 STA24 STA22 STA30 “y” means having DL/UL traffic flow; “no” means not having DL/UL traffic flow HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT John Doe, Some Company

One BSS Test Upright corner BSS B (STAs 3, 9 ,15, 21, 27) Sept 2014 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr1 Jan 2015 One BSS Test Upright corner BSS B (STAs 3, 9 ,15, 21, 27) DL only & UL only (STA rate in Mbps) The same traffic is attached to each STA HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT John Doe, Some Company

DL only Jan 2015 DL case is well aligned Each STA has almost equal rate (MCS 7 is supported by each AP->STA link) HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT

UL only Jan 2015 UL case is also align but not as well as the DL case STA rate is related to its distance from AP HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT

Jan 2015 Summary 1-BSS DL-only and UL-only results from four companies showed similar trend and aligned within a acceptable range. Next we will continue to minimize the difference in UL-only case and align our 3-BSS results. We welcome more companies to join the calibration. HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT

Jan 2015 Reference [1] 11-14/1523r4 Offline Discussion Minutes of SLS Calibration [2] 11-09/0451r16 TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology [3] 11-14/0571r6 Evaluation Methodology [4] 11-14/1176r0 PHY Abstraction Tables for 11ax System Level Simulation HUAWEI-LG-MRVL-NTT