HCF medium access rules

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /272a Submission June 2001 S. Choi, Philips Research Slide 1 Problems with IEEE (e) NAV Operation and ONAV Proposal Javier del.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /630r4a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research January 2002 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Session: IT 601: Mobile Computing IEEE e Prof. Anirudha Sahoo IIT Bombay.
Doc.: IEEE /605r3 Submission November 2001 S. Kandala, et. al. Slide 1 CFB Ending Rule under HCF Srinivas Kandala, Ken Nakashima, Yashihiro Ohtani.
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
Submission doc.: IEEE /569r1 November 2001 M. Benveniste -- AT&T Labs, ResearchSlide 1 An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions.
Doc.: IEEE /452 Submission December, 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 1 A Hybrid Coordination Function for QoS Michael Fischer Intersil Corporation.
Doc.: IEEE /494r0 Submission July 2001 Michael Fischer, Intersil (TGe Editor)Slide 1 Provisional Tge Ballot Comment Resolutions from the May,
Doc.: IEEE /361 Submission October 2000 Wim Diepstraten, LucentSlide 1 Distributed QoS resolution Greg Chesson-Altheros Wim Diepstraten- Lucent.
Submission doc.: IEEE /599r1 November 2001 M. Benveniste -- AT&T Labs, ResearchSlide 1 ‘Cyclic Prioritized Multiple Access (CPMA): An Access Mechanism.
Doc.: IEEE /109r2 Submission March 2001 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 1 Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details Michael.
Doc.:IEEE /566r2 Submission November 2001 S. Choi, Philips & M.M. Wentink, Intersil Slide 1 Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP Sunghyun.
AIFS – Revisited Mathilde Benveniste
EA C451 (Internetworking Technologies)
IEEE e Performance Evaluation
HCF and EDCF Simulations
An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions
AP access procedure for UL MU operation
IEEE : Wireless LANs ALOHA, Slotted ALOHA
EDCF TCID, Queues, and Access Parameters Relationship
HCF medium access rules
EDCF TXOP Bursting Simulation Results
NAV Protection Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs, Research July 2003
A Scheduling Scheme for Level-2 Enhanced PCF MAC Service
Speaker:Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor:Ho-Ting Wu Date:
Enhanced Channel Access Joint Proposal
Qos related issues in MAC and Baseline document #360
HCF Duration Field Set Rules
Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Texas Instruments Incorporated
PCF vs. DCF: Limitations and Trends
doc.: IEEE /457 Mathilde Benveniste AT&T Labs, Research
Scheduled Medium Access For Large Low Power BSS
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
Terminology Corrections and Improvements for the TGe Draft
Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
HCF medium access rules
Neighborhood Capture and OBSS
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
802.11e features for the enterprise
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
HCF medium access rules
Acknowledgement for Multicast Streams
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
PCF Enhancements and Contention Free Bursts
Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
Introduction to the TGe Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF)
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
July 2007 doc.: IEEE /2090r0 Aug 2007 Discussion on CCA Sensing on 20/40 MHz Secondary Channel with PIFS and DIFS Date: Authors: Notice:
802.11e EDCA-APSD TXOP Handoff September 2003
NAV Protection Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs, Research July 2003
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
802.11g Contention Period – Solution for Co-existence with Legacy
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
Group Synchronized DCF
‘Shield’: Protecting High-Priority Channel Access Attempts
CID 1195 Date: Authors: August 2018
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Enhancement for AV Transmission
Presentation transcript:

HCF medium access rules <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/429r0 July 2001 HCF medium access rules Wim Diepstraten Agere Systems WDiepstraten@Agere.com Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems <author>, <company>

July 2001 Backgound HCF can operate in the Contention Free Period (CFP) and the Contention Period (CP). All ESTA are pollable, but piggy-back Ack is not supported. Within the Contention Free Bursts (CFB) contention free access rules are applied. The HCF medium access rules should allow for EDCF contention during the CP. However the current rules specify that the HC can access the medium after a PIFS. A max duration of the CFB is defined, but with the PIFS rule the HC can immediately start a next CFB. This allows for infinitely extended CFBs. Clearly there is a conflict in these rules. Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems

July 2001 HC access objectives The HC shall allow for EDCF contention when operating in the CP. The CFB duration should be limited to limit the access delay for EDCF access. Given its role, and the traffic distribution the HC should be given extra access priority opportunities, to improve efficiency, and reduce contention overhead. Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems

Proposed CFB access rules July 2001 Proposed CFB access rules CFB access rules should allow EDCF contention opportunities when used during the CP. CFB duration is limited to allow EDCF contention opportunities. Between bursts the HC should use EDCF access procedures. Thereby contending with ESTA using EDCF. CFB can be allowed to piggyback its access on (E)DCF access from any station within the same BSS. Only if that station belongs to the same BSS, to prevent overlap issues. And the total duration of the burst is limited to the CFB max duration. This gives the HC the opportunity to gain access without contention for every (E)DCF access of any station within that BSS. Note that this also applies to legacy station. Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems

CFB start details in CP Each CFB start shall allow EDCF contention. July 2001 CFB start details in CP Each CFB start shall allow EDCF contention. The HC can start a CFB after any Data/Mgmt frame exchange from the same BSS with NF=0. Note that this does in most cases traffic to the AP, which the AP needs to Ack. The total burst duration should always be limited to CFB duration limit. Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems

July 2001 HC access rules At a start of a CFB the HC shall use the normal EDCF access rules. Which allows immediate access when medium was free longer then the applicable AIFS. Effectively the HC should enter a Postbackoff procedure at the end of a CFB. If no traffic is Q’ed then a low priority AIFS and CWmin should be used. If traffic is still Q’ed for transmission the appropriate AIFS and CWmin for that TC should be used for the postbackoff. If a station wins the contention, then the HC can piggyback its access at the end of the frame exchange by the station. So the HC will only experience a delay of one station access up to its TxOp limit. Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems

July 2001 General issues: What is the priority of a sequence-initiating Control frame? E.g. RTS, CF-Poll, PS-Poll RTS priority is the same as the data associated with it. PS-Poll ?? QoS no-data+CF-Poll ?? And what should the TCID field be? should have the same priority then the data that it is associated with. Note: CTS and Ack are response frames only. What is the relation between: TxOp limit. Max CFB duration. Probably want a separate limit for both. Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems

Normative text changes July 2001 Normative text changes Clause 9.10, line 32: Delete “using higher medium access priority than ESTA’s”. Add: The HCF shall perform the EDCF access procedure to start a CFB, or it can start a CFB at SIFS after a completed EDCF frame exchange (NF=0) of a (E)STA within the same BSS, provided that the total duration of the frame exchange + CFB is not longer then CFB limit. Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems

Simplified CFB limit rules July 2001 Simplified CFB limit rules Independent TxOp and CFB limit. HC does not need to dynamically decide what to put in its CFB, based on the previous (E)STA exchange. Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems

Motion to adopt following change: July 2001 Motion to adopt following change: Clause 9.10, line 32: Delete “using higher medium access priority than ESTA’s”. Add: The HCF shall perform the EDCF access procedure to start a CFB, or it can start a CFB at SIFS after a completed EDCF frame exchange (NF=0) of a (E)STA within the same BSS. Note that the question what CWmin to use for HC EDCF access is a separate discussion. Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems