80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0798r1 Submission July 2008 L. Chu Etc.Slide 1 HT Features in Mesh Network Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0037r0 Submission Jan. 17, 2011 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 BW Indication in Non-HT Frames Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission May 2009 L. Chu et alSlide 1 MCF Issues Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /0107r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Channel Bandwidth Indication and Negotiation Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
VHT Frame Padding Date: Authors: Month Year
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
MCS, NSS, BW and PPDU selection for 11ax
Preamble Parameters Date: Authors: Slide 1.
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Power Efficient PS Poll
20MHz Protection Mode Date: Authors: August 2008 Feb, 2008
Synchronization with Low Power Antenna
Samsung MAC Proposal Presentation
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
120MHz channelization solution
WUR MAC Consideration Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
BSS Color in NDP Ranging
Fragmentation with A-MPDU
Fair Quiet for DFS Date: Authors: February 2008
Reverse Direction in ac
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
RTS CTS Rule Amendment Date: Authors: Date: January 2011
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll
Comment Resolutions Date: Authors: February 2008
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Power Efficient PS Poll
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
Objectives of Explicit Feedback rules
HT Features in Mesh Network
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
160 MHz Transmissions Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Duration in L-SIG Date: Authors: May 2010 Month Year
SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO link access
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
NAV Clearing: Problems and Proposed Remedy
1MHz Dup Mode Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
BSS Color in NDP Ranging
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Channel Access Design for Synchronized Multi-Links
Presentation transcript:

80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: 2010-09-14 Authors: Date: September 2010 Feb, 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/xxxx Date: September 2010 80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: 2010-09-14 Authors: L. Chu et al Liwen Chu, STMicroelectronics

HT TXOP Protection and Truncation Date: September 2010 HT TXOP Protection and Truncation 802.11n introduces features that a legacy 802.11 STAs can not understand: 40MHz transmission, frame aggregation, short GI etc. 40MHz non-HT duplicate mode is used to protect the 11n transmission: Non-HT duplicate frames (e.g. RTS/CTS) are used to establish protection of its TXOP in two 20MHz channels, and Non-HT duplicate CF-End frame are used to truncate the protect TXOP protected by non-HT duplicate frames. To get a 40MHz EDCA based TXOP, a STA does EDCA backoff procedure in the primary channel, and detects the second channel being idle during PIFS interval before the TXOP. FC HT-STA1 RTS ch0 A-MPDU (HT frame) FC HT-AP1 ch0+ch1 RTS ch1 CTS ch0 BLKACK 11a-STA3 ch0+ch1 FC HT-AP1 11a-AP2 FC HT-STA1 11a-AP3 CTS ch1 11a-STA2 ch1 ch0+ch1 ch0 11a –STA2 NAV ch0 “ch0(primary channel)+ch1” is a 40MHz channel. ch0 is a 20MHz channel. 11a –STA3 NAV ch1 ch1 is a 20MHz channel.

802.11ac TXOP Protection and Truncation Date: September 2010 802.11ac TXOP Protection and Truncation 802.11ac uses 80/160 MHz channels. 802.11ac introduces new features that legacy 802.11a STAs and 802.11n STAs can not understand: DL-MU MIMO, new 802.11ac preamble etc. 802.11ac TXOP should be protected by frames which can be understood by 802.11a STAs and 802.11n STAs in each 20MHz channel. 80MHz/160MHz non-HT duplicate frames are used for such TXOP protection/truncation: 80MHz/160MHz non-HT duplicate frame duplicates 20 MHz non-HT transmission in each 20 MHz channel of a 80MHz/160MHz channel. 80MHz/160MHz Non-HT duplicate frames (e.g. RTS/CTS) are used to establish protection of its TXOP in four 20MHz channels or in eight 20MHz channels, and 80MHz/160MHz Non-HT duplicate CF-End frame is used to truncate the protect TXOP protected by non-HT duplicate frames in four 20MHz channels or in eight 20MHz channels.

802.11ac TXOP Protection and Truncation (Cont’d) Date: September 2010 802.11ac TXOP Protection and Truncation (Cont’d) To get a 80MHz/160MHz EDCA based TXOP, a STA does EDCA backoff procedure in the primary channel, and detects the other 20MHz channels being idle during PIFS interval before the TXOP. RTS A-MPDU (VHT frame) ch3 RTS ch2 ch0+ch1+ch2+ch3 RTS ch1 VHT-AP1 RTS ch0 VHT-STA1 CTS ch0 ch1 ch2 ch3 BLKACK FC HT-STA3 Ch0+ch1+ch2+ch3 VHT-STA1 VHT-AP1 11a-AP2 FC HT-AP3 11a-STA2 ch0+ch1 ch0+ch1+ch2+ch3 ch3 11a–STA2 NAV ch3 “ch0(primary channel)+ch1+ch2+ch3” is a 80MHz channel. “ch0(primary channel)+ch1” is a 40MHz channel. FC HT–STA3 NAV ch0 ch3 is a 20MHz channel.

Negotiation of Used Channel Bandwidth (TBD) Date: September 2010 Negotiation of Used Channel Bandwidth (TBD) The TXOP holder and the TXOP responder notify the peer STA of the usage of channels for the following frame transmission through non-HT duplicate frame handshake. We call the two frames the non-HT duplicate initiating frame, the non-HT duplicate responding frame. The selection of non-HT duplicate frames will allow legacy 802.11a, 802.11n device to set the NAV correctly. The legacy devices will not delete the received frames per their frame receiving rules. The TXOP holder transmits CF-End frame to truncate the TXOP through the same channel set that it transmits the non-HT duplicate initiating frame. And the TXOP responder transmits CF-End frame to truncate the TXOP through the same channel set that it transmits the non-HT duplicate responding frame. The TXOP responder may transmit the non-duplicate responding frame by the subset of the channels that the TXOP holder transmits the non-HT duplicate initiating frame for TXOP-protection.

Updated RTS/CTS method (TBD) Date: September 2010 Updated RTS/CTS method (TBD) A RTS includes the candidate subchannel set in the reserved bits of Service field or PHY padding. The TXOP holder selects the candidate subchannel set from the idle 20MHz operating channels that it detects. A CTS includes final subchannel set in the reserved bits of Service field or PHY padding. The final subchannel set must be the same as or subset of the candidate subchannel set. The final subchannel set must only include the idle 20MHz operating channels that the TXOP responder detects. The final subchannel set is used for the following frame transmission in the TXOP.

Updated RTS/CTS method (Cont’d)(TBD) Date: September 2010 Updated RTS/CTS method (Cont’d)(TBD) A new control frame (VHT-RTS?) that uses non-HT duplicate format to initiate the TXOP includes candidate subchannel set. The TXOP holder selects the candidate subchannel set from the idle 20MHz operating channels that it detects. If the TXOP holder does not receive the responding control frame, it transmits CF-End to reset the neighbor STA’s NAV timer. A new control frame (VHT-CTS?) that uses non-HT duplicate format to respond the initiating frame of the TXOP which includes final subchannel set. The TXOP responder does not transmit respond frame if its NAV timer is not 0 or all the channels in the candidate subchannel set are busy. If a VHT STA can not receive the non-HT duplicate responding frame, it will reset the NAV timer set by the non-HT duplicate initiating frame. The final subchannel set must be the same as or subset of the candidate subchannel set. The final subchannel set must only include the idle 20MHz operating channels that the TXOP responder detects. The final subchannel set is used for the following frame transmission in the TXOP.

Vender specific action/ACK method (TBD) Date: September 2010 Vender specific action/ACK method (TBD) A new Vender specific action frame that uses non-HT duplicate format to initiate the TXOP includes candidate subchannel set. The TXOP holder selects the candidate subchannel set from the idle 20MHz operating channels that it detects. If the TXOP holder does not receive the responding ACK/vender specific responding frame, it transmits CF-End to reset the neighbor STA’s NAV timer. Option 1 of non-HT duplicate responding frame: An ACK that uses non-HT duplicate format to respond the initiating frame of the TXOP includes final subchannel set. The TXOP responder does not transmit respond frame if its NAV timer is not 0 or all the channels in the candidate subchannel set are busy. This is the change to ACK rules. If a VHT STA can not receive the non-HT duplicate responding frame, it will reset the NAV timer set by the non-HT duplicate initiating frame. The final subchannel set must be the same or subset of the candidate subchannel set. The final subchannel set must only include the idle 20MHz operating channels that the TXOP responder detects. The final subchannel set is used for the following frame transmission in the TXOP.

Vender specific action/ACK method (Cont’d) (TBD) Date: September 2010 Vender specific action/ACK method (Cont’d) (TBD) Option 2 of non-HT duplicate responding frame: A new Vender specific action frame that uses non-HT duplicate format to respond the initiating frame of the TXOP includes final subchannel set. The TXOP responder does not transmit respond frame if its NAV timer is not 0 or all the channels in the candidate subchannel set are busy. If a VHT STA can not receive the non-HT duplicate responding frame, it will reset the NAV timer set by the non-HT duplicate initiating frame. The final subchannel set must be the same or subset of the candidate subchannel set. The final subchannel set must only include the idle 20MHz operating channels that the TXOP responder detects. The final subchannel set is used for the following frame transmission in the TXOP.

80MHz/160MHz non-HT Duplicate Transmission Date: September 2010 80MHz/160MHz non-HT Duplicate Transmission 80MHz/160MHz Non-HT duplicate transmission is used to transmit to 802.11a, 802.11n STAs that nay be present in a 20MHz/40MHz channel covered by 80MHz/160MHz channel. The L-STF, L-LTF and L-SIG shall be transmitted in the same way as in the 802.11ac 80MHz/160MHz VHT transmission. The VHT-SIG, VHT-STF, VHT-LTF are not transmitted.

Date: September 2010 Straw Poll Do you support adding the following item into the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? R5.X: 80MHz/160MHz duplicate mode shall be included in the specification to protect 80MHz/160MHz transmission.