Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solution Structure of ZASP PDZ Domain
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Yizhou Liu, Richard A. Kahn, James H. Prestegard  Structure 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of a Novel Globular Domain in RBM10 Containing OCRE, the Octamer Repeat Sequence Motif  Bryan T. Martin, Pedro Serrano,
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Thomas R. Lane, Elaine Fuchs, Kevin C. Slep  Structure 
Structural Diversity in Integrin/Talin Interactions
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages (October 2010)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Autoinhibitory Structure of the WW Domain of HYPB/SETD2 Regulates Its Interaction with the Proline-Rich Region of Huntingtin  Yong-Guang Gao, Hui Yang,
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Autoinhibitory Structure of the WW Domain of HYPB/SETD2 Regulates Its Interaction with the Proline-Rich Region of Huntingtin  Yong-Guang Gao, Hui Yang,
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 277-286 (February 2005) Structure and Phosphatidylinositol-(3,4)- Bisphosphate Binding of the C-Terminal PH Domain of Human Pleckstrin  Christian Edlich, Gunter Stier, Bernd Simon, Michael Sattler, Claudia Muhle-Goll  Structure  Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 277-286 (February 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.11.012 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 NMR Structure of the Pleckstrin C-Terminal PH Domain (C-PH) (A) Architecture of the pleckstrin protein: domain boundaries and phosphorylation sites are indicated. The lower panel shows the linker sequence between DEP and C-PH and the different constructs that were tested. (B) C-PH in ribbon representation. In this view, the C-terminal helix α2 is at the bottom of the β sandwich and the “open” side with the β1−β2 and β3−β4 loops is at the top. The termini, the three longest loops and both helices are labeled. α helices are in red and β strands in blue. (C) Stereo image of the NMR structural ensemble. The 10 lowest energy structures of C-PH234–350 are superimposed. Labeling as in (B). Structure 2005 13, 277-286DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.11.012) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Protein Lipid Overlay Assay (A) The ability of pleckstrin C-PH to bind to various phospholipids was tested. GST-C-PH only bound strongly to PtdIns(3,4)P2. The amount of lipid per spot was 200 pmoles. Abbreviations for the lipids: S1P: sphingosine-1-phosphate; LPA: lysophosphatidic acid; LPC: lysophosphocholine; PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; PS: phosphatidylserine; PA: phosphatidic acid; PC: phosphatidylcholine; PtdIns: phosphatidylinositol. (B) Array with decreasing concentrations (100–1.5 pmole) of PIPs: GST-C-PH even bound low amounts of PtdIns(3,4)P2. Structure 2005 13, 277-286DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.11.012) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Chemical Shift Perturbation Experiments with Ins(1,3,4)P3 and Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (A) 1H,15N-HSQC of C-PH with (red) or without (black) a 4:1 excess of Ins(1,3,4)P3. For the most strongly affected peaks the trajectory is indicated. Inset: the NH2 region of the HSQC is drawn at a lower background level since the most strongly affected NH2 side chain resonances have unusually weak signals. (B) Difference in chemical shift (Δδ) between free and ligand bound state of C-PH, at 0.15 mM protein concentration and a 1:4 protein-ligand ratio. For each backbone amide, Δδ is plotted against the sequence position. Red bars are for titrations with Ins(1,3,4)P3 whereas green thin bars are for Ins(1,3,4,5)P4. The difference in chemical shift Δδ was calculated with the formula Δδ = √ (ΔδH2 + (ΔδN/10)2). Structure 2005 13, 277-286DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.11.012) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structure-Based Sequence Alignment of C-PH with High-Affinity PH Domains that Were Solved in Complex with Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 The KxG…KxR…Y sequence motif on the β1, β2, and β3 strands that confers specificity for D3-phosphorylated inositols is highlighted with black boxes. Residues that mediate additional ligand contacts in the complex structures are in bold print and boxed. The residues on pleckstrin C-PH that were most strongly affected by Ins(1,3,4)P3 on C-PH (Δδ > 0.2 ppm) are marked with an asterisk and coincide with the region of the specificity motif. Resonances that are exchange-broadened in the free state and become observable upon addition of Ins(1,3,4)P3 are labeled with an arrow. Secondary structure elements of C-PH are indicated above the alignment. TAPP1, although solved in complex to citrate, is also included in the alignment because it is the only other Ins(1,3,4)P3 specific domain for which a structure is available. Structure 2005 13, 277-286DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.11.012) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Binding Site Mapping on C-PH (A) Ribbon representation of C-PH with color coding depending on chemical shift difference (Δδ) between Ins(1,3,4)P3-bound and free state ranging from red (strongly affected) over orange and yellow to blue (unaffected). Gray: no data (prolines). The binding site is located at the “open” side of the domain mainly involving the β1, β2 strands and the β1-β2 loop. (B) Surface representation with electrostatic potential (± 10 kBT). The structure is rotated by 90° around the horizontal axis with respect to (A). Basic residues in the specificity motif (β1 and β2 strands) and in the β1−β2 loop contribute to the positive potential that coincides with the binding site shown in (A). Structure 2005 13, 277-286DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.11.012) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Mutational Analysis (A) Protein lipid overlay assays were carried out with pleckstrin C-PH mutants. Mutations are indicated above each strip. The position of the lipids on the strips is displayed in (C). Abbreviations for the lipids are as for Figure 2. (B) The side chains of the mutated residues are highlighted and colored: residues in red abolish binding when mutated, while blue is for residues that have no effect. The side chain of R264, the only residue of the specificity motif that was not mutated, is drawn in gray. Note that the β1−β2 loop has considerable conformational freedom; therefore, the orientation shown is only one possibility. Structure 2005 13, 277-286DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.11.012) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions