Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
Advertisements

Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
Use of cow culling to help meet compliance for somatic cell standards H. D. Norman and J. R. Wright * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
2012 ADSA-AMPA-ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS joint annual meeting (1)Norman Comparison of daughter performance of New Zealand and North American sires in US herds H.D.
Derivation of Factors to Estimate Daily Fat, Protein, and Somatic Cell Score from One Milking of Cows Milked Three Times Daily M. M. Schutz* 1 and H. D.
Effects of complex vertebral malformation gene on production and reproduction M. T. Kuhn*, J. L. Hutchison, and C. P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs.
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2002 7WCGALP (HDN-1) Performance of Holstein clones in the United States H.D. NORMAN,*,1 T.J. LAWLOR, 2 and J.R. WRIGHT 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Synchronization Effects on Parameters for Days Open M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and R. H. Miller* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
2003 Melvin Tooker, Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2006.
Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
Factors that affect abortion frequency in dairy herds in the United States R.H. Miller,* M.T. Kuhn, H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
G.R. Wiggans* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
Norman, 2014ICAR / Interbull annual meeting, Berlin, Germany, May 20, 2014 (1) Dr. H. Duane Norman Interim Administrator Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding.
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Multibreed Genomic Evaluation Using Purebred Dairy Cattle K. M. Olson* 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic and State.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2004 P.M. VanRaden, M.E. Tooker*, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
H.D. Norman*, J.L. Hutchison, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
Characteristics of milk ELISA results for Johne’s disease in US dairy cows Byrem, T. M. 1 *, H. D. Norman 2 and J. R. Wright 2 1 Antel BioSystems, Lansing,
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2001 ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) Simultaneous accounting for heterogeneity of (co)variance components in genetic evaluation of type traits N. Gengler.
2005 P.M. VanRaden and M.E. Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Effect.
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT
Cross-Breeding What is X-Breeding?.
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
A National Sire Fertility Index
Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Domestic vs. imported AI semen for Holstein graziers in the US
Validation of genomic predictions and genomic reliability
Abstr. M4 Merit of obtaining genetic evaluations of milk yield for each parity on Holstein bulls H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* R.L. Powell, and P.M. VanRaden.
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
M.T. Kuhn* and P. M. VanRaden USDA-AIPL, Beltsville, MD
Measures of Fertility: Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations
Reproductive trends of dairy herds in the United States
3Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON Canada
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
Economics of Reproduction: the Quality of the Pregnancy
Presentation transcript:

Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C. Goodling, Jr. 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350 2 Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA Abstr. W90 2010 INTRODUCTION Response to genetic selection has been well documented on a population basis Dairy producers are more likely to appreciate its value if it is demonstrated in their own herd Prediction on an individual herd level should be a useful extension tool RESULTS Means and standard deviations (SD) of individual herd regression coefficients (b) for Holstein and Jersey herds RESULTS (cont.) RESULTS (cont.) Means and standard deviations of individual Holstein herd regression coefficients (b) by number of records per herd Comparison of distribution of regression coefficients (b) from predicting 1st parity ME Milk from Parent BV Milk for Holstein herds with high or low levels of usable id and production Trait Holstein Jersey ME Milk 1.01 ± 0.45 1.02 ± 0.42 ME Fat 0.90 ± 0.44 0.91 ± 0.39 ME Protein 0.81 ± 0.43 0.91 ± 0.43 ME SCS 0.88 ± 0.60 0.86 ± 0.69 Days open 1.03 ± 1.10 1.03 ± 1.12 PL 0.71 ± 0.69 0.69 ± 0.80 Means Trait 50-99 100-199 200-499 500-999 >1000 ME Milk 0.96 1.02 1.05 1.04 1.06 ME Fat 0.88 0.95 0.90 0.82 0.77 ME Protein 0.78 0.84 0.82 0.73 0.73 ME SCS 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.68 0.60 Days Open 0.80 1.02 1.18 1.28 1.19 PL 0.69 0.75 0.72 0.66 0.64 Standard Deviations ME Milk 0.53 0.43 0.38 0.31 0.25 ME Fat 0.50 0.44 0.39 0.32 0.28 ME Protein 0.47 0.43 0.39 0.31 0.29 ME SCS 0.74 0.60 0.45 0.32 0.26 Days Open 1.30 1.15 0.91 0.67 0.57 PL 0.88 0.69 0.50 0.35 0.26 Herds 2,251 2,867 1,533 473 355 Percent of herds OBJECTIVE To illustrate genetic progress can be shown on an individual herd basis. Distribution of herd regression coefficients (b) from predicting 1st parity ME Milk from Parent BV Milk DATA First lactation cows calving 2005-2008 Required to have sire PTA and dam PTA Cow’s phenotypic record was matched with sire PTA and dam PTA from evaluation prior to cow’s first calving Herds were required to have a minimum of 50 cows meeting above criteria 8,257 Holstein herds; 441 Jersey herds Regression Coefficient (b) Percent of herds Standard deviations of the regression coefficients decreased as number of records per herd increased CONCLUSIONS Standard deviations were large but response to genetic selection on a within-herd basis can be demonstrated Increasing number of records per herd did not improve predictive ability, but did increase the uniformity of the observed response Response was greater in higher production herds Response was also greater in herds with more complete identification Illustration of individual herd response should increase confidence in national genetic evaluations in well managed herds Regression Coefficient (b) Means of individual Holstein herd regression coefficients (b) by herd production level (kg) Means of individual Holstein herd regression coefficients (b) by percent of herd with usable identification (id) METHODS SAS GLM for each herd using the model: Phenotypic trait= Parent Breeding Value (BV) (Sire PTA + Dam PTA) of same trait + Cow’s calving year + Error Traits predicted: 1st lactation Mature Equivalent (ME) Milk, Fat, Protein, and Somatic Cell Score (SCS) 1st lactation Days open (DO) (using Parent BV Daughter Pregnancy Rate * -4) Productive life (PL) 10,000- 11,000- 12,000- Trait <10,000 10,999 11,999 12,999 ≥13,000 ME Milk 0.74 0.90 1.00 1.08 1.16 ME Fat 0.67 0.80 0.87 0.95 1.10 ME Protein 0.59 0.72 0.79 0.85 0.95 ME SCS 0.93 0.89 0.87 0.86 0.92 Days Open 0.86 0.92 1.04 1.10 1.10 PL 0.72 0.71 0.71 0.70 0.74 Herds: 579 1,244 2,184 2,052 1,143 Trait <50 50-74 75-89 90-98 99-100 ME Milk 0.91 0.95 0.98 1.01 1.11 ME Fat 0.56 0.67 0.83 0.97 1.12 ME Protein 0.50 0.59 0.74 0.87 1.00 ME SCS 0.51 0.65 0.82 0.98 1.06 Days Open 0.90 0.98 1.02 1.05 1.09 PL 0.53 0.59 0.68 0.75 0.82 Herds 489 1,063 1,468 3,000 1,489 Standard deviations of the regression coefficients (not shown) had little change across groups for milk, fat and protein (0.42 to 0.48) but decreased as production increased for SCS, Days open, and PL Standard deviations of the regression coefficients (not shown) increased slightly as percent usable herd identification increased http://aipl.arsusda.gov/