Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages (December 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 102, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Advertisements

Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Interaction between G Protein-Coupled Receptor 143 and Tyrosinase: Implications for Understanding Ocular Albinism Type 1  Elisabetta De Filippo, Anke.
Reliable and Global Measurement of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Using Fluorescence Microscopes  Zongping Xia, Yuechueng Liu  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Expression and cellular localization of human hyaluronidase-2 in articular chondrocytes and cultured cell lines  G. Chow, Ph.D., C.B. Knudson, Ph.D.,
Christopher L. Kepley, PhD, Bridget S. Wilson, PhD, Janet M
by Martha B. Johnson, and Caroline A. Enns
Bin Wu, Jeffrey A. Chao, Robert H. Singer  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Differential proteome analysis of normal and osteoarthritic chondrocytes reveals distortion of vimentin network in osteoarthritis  S. Lambrecht, M.Pharm.,
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Qian Xu, Wan-Chen Lin, Rebecca S. Petit, Jay T. Groves 
Molecular Dynamics in Living Cells Observed by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy with One- and Two-Photon Excitation  Petra Schwille, Ulrich Haupts,
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 102, Issue 10, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Establishment of Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Method for Quantitative Analysis of Asparagine Synthetase Expression  Tamotsu Irino, Toshiyuki Kitoh,
Monitoring Actin Cortex Thickness in Live Cells
Alex J. Smith, Alan S. Verkman  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying KVS-1-MPS-1 Complex Assembly
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Aleš Benda, Yuanqing Ma, Katharina Gaus  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Marie-Thérèse Leccia  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Model of Aquaporin-4 Supramolecular Assembly in Orthogonal Arrays Based on Heterotetrameric Association of M1-M23 Isoforms  Byung-Ju Jin, Andrea Rossi,
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Jennifer J Kohler, Carolyn R Bertozzi  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 94, Issue 7, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
A Proteinaceous Gene Regulatory Thermometer in Salmonella
Qian Xu, Wan-Chen Lin, Rebecca S. Petit, Jay T. Groves 
Volume 102, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 93, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
K. Venkatesan Iyer, S. Pulford, A. Mogilner, G.V. Shivashankar 
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Michael C. Puljung, William N. Zagotta  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 102, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Chien-Jung Lo, Mark C. Leake, Richard M. Berry  Biophysical Journal 
Interferon-γ-Mediated Growth Regulation of Melanoma Cells: Involvement of STAT1- Dependent and STAT1-Independent Signals  Anja Bosserhoff  Journal of Investigative.
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy of mCherry in Living Cells
Phospholemman Modulates the Gating of Cardiac L-Type Calcium Channels
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Monitoring Actin Cortex Thickness in Live Cells
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 101, Issue 9, Pages (November 2011)
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Vikram A. Kanda, Anthony Lewis, Xianghua Xu, Geoffrey W. Abbott 
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Geert van den Bogaart, Jacek T. Mika, Victor Krasnikov, Bert Poolman 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages 2807-2815 (December 2011) Analyzing the Homeostasis of Signaling Proteins by a Combination of Western Blot and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy  Yi-Da Chung, Michael D. Sinzinger, Petra Bovee-Geurts, Marina Krause, Sip Dinkla, Irma Joosten, Werner J. Koopman, Merel J.W. Adjobo-Hermans, Roland Brock  Biophysical Journal  Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages 2807-2815 (December 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.058 Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Determination of cellular protein concentrations using FCS for calibration of WB. Lysates of cells transiently expressing the protein of interest fused to an FP are analyzed in parallel by FCS and WB. With knowledge of the confocal detection volume Veff (Section S3), the molecule number N obtained by FCS is converted into a concentration of FP (Cf) in the lysate. This concentration is then used to calculate the endogenous protein concentration through determination of the ratio (Re/f) between the endogenous and recombinant fluorescent fusion protein, as obtained from WB analysis. Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 2807-2815DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.058) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Determination of the fraction of fluorescing fusion proteins. (A) Scheme depicting the protocol for determining the fraction of fluorescing fusion proteins. Concentrations of FPs (Cfluo) are derived from the number of fluorescent molecules (Nfluo), as provided by FCS, divided by the confocal detection volume (Veff). The concentration of total FP (Ctotal) is determined by using standard quantitative WB of known amounts of purified FPs as a standard and probing with an antibody against FP. Band intensities (I) for purified FPs on WB versus the respective molecule numbers (N) in the samples are plotted as a standard curve for determining unknown samples. The fluorescent fraction of FP (F) is given by the ratio Cfluo/Ctotal. (B) WB of FPs probed with an antibody against monomeric DsRed for detection of mCherry. Different amounts of cell lysates or recombinant proteins were loaded into the individual lanes (lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 14: purified mCherry; lanes 2 and 12: mCh-GADS; lanes 4 and 11: mCh-SHP1; lanes 6 and 8: transiently expressed mCherry; lanes 10 and 13: mCh-GRB2). (C) Comparison of the endogenous GRB2 concentration determined by the conventional quantitative WB method (black bar) and the FCS-based method without (white bar) and with (gray bars) correction of the fraction of fluorescing proteins, without (left) and with (right) propagation of the error for fluorescing fractions of FPs. Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 2807-2815DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.058) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Determination of endogenous GRB2. (A) WB of lysates of mCherry and mCherry-GRB2-transfected Jurkat cells probed with an anti-GRB2 antibody. Samples containing different amounts of lysate were loaded in a randomized fashion to compensate for drift in the gel. Lanes 2, 5, and 7 contain various volumes of lysates of mCherry-transfected cells. Lanes 1, 3, 4, and 6 contain various volumes of lysates of mCh-GRB2-transfected cells. The arrowhead in the upper panel indicates mCh-GRB2, and the one in the lower panel indicates the endogenous GRB2. (B) Linear regression analysis of background-corrected intensities of endogenous GRB2 (solid squares) and mCh-GRB2 (solid triangles) plotted versus cell numbers. (C) Autocorrelation functions of mCh-GRB2 in crude cell lysates. The global fit to the autocorrelation function is indicated as a solid black curve. Average numbers of molecules were derived from the amplitude of fitted autocorrelation curves. Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 2807-2815DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.058) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Intracellular protein distribution. GRB2 (A and F), GADS (B and G), SHP1 (C and H), and LAT (D and I) were either expressed as fluorescent fusion proteins (A–D) or detected by immunofluorescence (F–I). (E and J) Autofluorescence controls were either not transfected (E) or incubated only with secondary antibody (J). Scale bar indicates 5 μm. Biophysical Journal 2011 101, 2807-2815DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.058) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions