The Appeal Process In Wisconsin Legal Principles for Bringing Suit Against the Sovereign.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Handling The Eminent Domain Process Bergman Dacey Goldsmith, APLC Greg M. Bergman Brian J. Bergman Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 900 Los Angeles, California.
Advertisements

Right of Way Acquisition Process Jesse W. Smith Right of Way Manager.
Project Certification & Encroachments The SR 305 Experience Project Certification & Encroachments The SR 305 Experience.
THE ROLE OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION By Aaron Hardiman, MBA, ARM.
AASHTO 2005 Right of Way and Utilities Conference Austin, Texas Acquisition Alternatives and Eminent Domain.
1. Parties have contractual capacity 2. Contract has legal purpose 3. Offer 4. Acceptance 5. Consideration 6. Statute of Frauds compliance.
Contract and Grant Provisions and Administration Section 105 (Page 30) Title I The Act.
CONTRACT CLOSEOUT NORTH REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE 13 January 2010.
Land Acquisition law Anisa Ahrar Director Commercial and Private Sector Laws Ministry of Justice.
Landlord-Tenant Issues in JP Court
50 Ways to Lose Your Money Dave Leighow Realty Specialist FHWA-HEPR-Salem, OR.
January 21, 2009Charles J. Noel & Associates, P.A.1 Minnesota’s First-Party Bad Faith Statute M.S (2008) Presented to Northwest Loss Association.
35 ILCS 200 Article 27 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA TAXING DISTRICT Creating Community Excitement for Lake Dredging/Restoration Projects.
Chapter 1 Legal Framework Affecting Public Schools
Interim measures in Russian courts in support of international arbitration: principles, procedure and the range of remedies available BRLA seminar 25 January.
Condominium Liens For Aggressive & Essential Collection of Unit Owner Arrears Prepared by Michael Clifton, M.A., LL.B., ACCI (Law), partner, Clifton Kok.
Prepared by Clive J. Strong Idaho Deputy Attorney General For 2011 CWAG Annual Conference.
The Role of Custom Thornton v. Hay, 462 P.2d 671 (Or. 1969).  Appeal from decree enjoining building of fences.  Court rejected prescription because it.
ARE YOU SMARTER THAN THE IRAC? Are You Smarter Than The IRAC 1,000,000 5th Grade Benefits 5th Grade Fed Guidance 4th Grade History 4th Grade Regulations.
CODE ENFORCEMENT AS A REDEVELOPMENT TOOL: YOUR LEGAL TOOLBOX David N. Tolces, Esq. Goren, Cherof, Doody & Ezrol, P.A E. Commercial Blvd., #200 Fort.
Missouri Department of Transportation Eminent Domain Overview Presented by – Nathan Briggs.
A TTORNEY ’ S L IENS Judge Mary Mulhern. S TATUTORY B ASIS FOR A TTORNEY ’ S L IEN 770 ILCS 5/1: Attorneys at law shall have a lien upon all claims, demands.
WHO’S IN CHARGE? 70,000 MILES OF PROPOSED PIPELINES IN OHIO? AN INFORMATION SESSION Pipeline Impact on Ohio Landowners Michael M. Hollingsworth, Attorney.
Suing the Federal Government. 2 History Traditional Sovereign Immunity US Constitution "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence.
Fourth Annual Public Employment Law Seminar Title VII – Nuts & Bolts November 7, 2013 Eugene H. Matthews
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
Texas Real Estate Contracts 4 th Edition © 2015 OnCourse Learning.
______________ Eminent Domain, Condemning Real Property In Federal Court; A Wisconsin Perspective ______________ Eminent Domain, Condemning Real Property.
When to Purchase Access Rights versus When to Exercise our Police Power in Lieu of Purchasing. Mike Roach WisDOT Access Management Engineer May 15, 2013.
Patty Bartlett Logan County Treasurer / Public Trustee.
FISCAL STUDIES: LEGAL BASIS John R. Molitor Attorney.
Assistant General Counsel Kathleen M. Batha Assistant Attorney General Sara K. Beachy Wisconsin Dells, Chula Vista Resort May 15, 2013.
CONDEMNATION LAW What’s New? Raymond O. Howd, Assistant Attorney General.
Appraisal and Acquisition: A Collaborative Partnership Speakers: Burl Wilson, MAI, SRPA Wilson Real Estate, Inc. D. Wade Brown, SR/WA, R/W-RAC, R/W-NAC.
March 13, 2015 Lawrence McDonough Pro Bono Counsel Dorsey and Whitney, LLP Suite South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN
Real Estate Taxes and Other Liens LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Define the term lien and give examples of the following types of liens: voluntary, involuntary,
Federal Requirements for Right of Way. Training Objectives  Identify the constitutional basis for paying just compensation to property owners.  Define.
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR RIGHT OF WAY FHWA & The Uniform Act.
Right of Way Section Dee Jones State Right of Way Manager Richard Dunlap Operations Manager Joe Gray Region 5 Right of Way Manager
1 Welcome to the International Right of Way Association’s Course 501 Residential Relocation Assistance 501.PPT.R
Contract Review.  1. The final step in the vendor contracting process should be getting the vendor’s standard written contract and signing the contract.
THE BILL OF COSTS JULY 2014 Ted Wood Assistant General Counsel Office of Court Administration (512) (512)
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
2015 ACEC- KY/FHWA/KYTC Partnering Conference CONDEMNATION PITFALLS JOHN F. ESTILL.
The Constitution and Dispute Resolution OBE 118, Section10, Fall, 2004 Professor McKinsey Recommended Chapter Three review problems beginning on page 136.
Chapter 16. Georgia Real Estate An Introduction to the Profession Eighth Edition Chapter 16 Real Estate Leases.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Thou Shall It’s Appealing For Short Takin’ Care of Business Odds & Ends
1 Water Right Conveyances Division of Water Rights By Randy Tarantino Title Program Specialist Telephone: (801) March.
Applicable Documents and KRS Statutes  FHWA Utility Relocation and Accommodation Guidelines  KRS  23CFR  23CFR  23CFR
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Professor Fischer CLASS of April THE LAST CLASS!!!
Introduction The Consumer Protection Act was enacted in Amendments were made in The Act applies to the whole of India except the State of.
2015 NW Regional Right of Way Conference Legal Updates – Tuesday October 27 th Scott Henderson – Project Manager.
The importance of... Original by Kathy Curren April 2012 / Updates made December 2015 by Sherry Miner At the end of this presentation, come back and see.
Chapter Twelve. The Automatic Stay—11 U.S.C 362 After reading this chapter, you will be able to: Describe litigation that occurs in the bankruptcy system.
Georgian Legislation on Involuntary Land Acquisition and Resettlement and WB OP 4.12 Tbilisi, May 2013 Klavdiya Maksymenko.
Waller v. ATC, 2013 WI 77, 833 N.W.2d 764 (Decided July 16, 2013)
Montreux Homeowners Association repossession process BY PETER.
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Real Estate Overview Matt Kouskouris, Division.
INDIAN TAKEOVERS Meaning Of Acqusition: When an “acquirer” takes over the control of the “target company”, it is termed as takeover. When an acquirer.
HOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTEREST IN A SALE CONTRACT Focus on what you “get” when you sign!
MECHANICS LIENS: NEW CHANGES & OLD ISSUES Ryan Hiss, Lyman & Nielsen, LLC Brienne Berscheid, Chicago Title Insurance Company.
Essential Requirements of the Uniform Act for Local Public Agencies
MECHANICS LIENS: New Changes & Old Issues
Property Acquisition, Eminent Domain and Relocation The Redevelopment Training Institute October 5, 2016 Presented by John H. Buonocore, Jr., Esq. Anthony.
The Federal Court System
Right of Way – Eligible for State Aid Reimbursement
Liability Under CERCLA
Unit 13 ARE 306 Regulatory Takings: Condemnation, Regulation and Impermissible Takings of Private Property.
Eminent Domain.
Presentation transcript:

The Appeal Process In Wisconsin Legal Principles for Bringing Suit Against the Sovereign

Presentation Contents: 1.WisDOT Acquisition Process Flow Chart 2.WisDOT Average Acquisition Timelines Appraisal Phase Negotiation Phase Litigation Phase 3.Types of Appeals: Statutory Process Applicable Timelines

The first is a standard condemnation proceeding in which the public agency does not take possession and title to condemned property until after a jury has awarded just compensation; thus, the taking and the compensation are contemporaneous and occur at the conclusion of court proceedings. Until then, the property owner bears the risk of loss to the property. ( Citations omitted). The second procedure, a quick-take proceeding, allows a public agency to take possession of a condemned property and the property owner to obtain the probable compensation for that property well in advance of the termination of court proceedings. […] City of South Gate v. Jauregui 2012 WL 89870, 1 (Cal.App. 2 Dist.,2012) Quick Take Defined

Part One: Acquisition Flow Chart

Part Two: WisDOT Average Acquisition Process Timelines

Maximum Negotiation Timeline Minimum Condemnation Timeline EventDaysTotal Nominal 1 st Meeting With Owner Agent Appraisal Meeting With Owner Appraisal Submitted for CO/Regional Review and Offering Price Approval Appraisal To Owner Day Owner Appraisal Period Jurisdiction Offer to Owner Day Jurisdictional Offer Negotiation Period Award of Damages Recorded – Rights Vest-3-10 Right of Way Certification-7 Plans Specifications and Estimates00 Construction Contract Letting Date+120 Project Timeline:

Tasks Necessary to Completion: Appraisal Contract awarded to consultant Approximate Time: 2 months Appraisal Phase: Draft Appraisal submitted to WisDOT for Review and Offering Price Approval Approximate Time: 2 months

Appraisal Phase:

Negotiation Phase Negotiation Phase: T-minus approx (107) Days to Parcel Completion

Litigation Phase Wisconsin Dept. of Justice Represents WisDOT Regional Litigation Coordinators assist T plus zero to 4 years, or more!!

Part 3: Procedure for Property Owner Challenges to WisDOT Acquisitions and Relocations How It Works in Wisconsins Quick Take Process.

What about the states Immunity from Suit – i.e., Sovereign Immunity? Wis. Const. Article IV, Section 27. The legislature shall direct by law in what manner and in what courts suits may be brought against the state. ****States condemnation statutes are considered a broad waiver of sovereign immunity, and, along with claims founded directly on the constitution itself, are the exclusive methods for an aggrieved land owner to claim just compensation for the taking or occupation of private property.**** The doctrine of sovereign immunity cannot bar an action for just compensation based on a taking of private property for public use even though the legislature has failed to establish specific provisions for the recovery of just compensation. Zinn v. State, 112 Wis.2d 417, 334 N.W. 2d 67 (Wis. 1983)

Comparison: State Constitutional Takings Clauses – Takings vs Takings and Damages Wisconsin: ARTICLE I, Sec. 13. Private Property for public use. SECTION 13. The property of no person shall be taken for public use without just compensation therefor. Minnesota: ARTICLE I, BILL OF RIGHTS Sec. 13. Private property for public use. Private property shall not be taken, destroyed or damaged for public use without just compensation therefor, first paid or secured. Illinois: ARTICLE 1 BILL OF RIGHTS SECTION 15. RIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN Private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation as provided by law. Such compensation shall be determined by a jury as provided by law. Michigan: ARTICLE X Property § 2 Eminent domain; compensation. Sec. 2. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation therefore being first made or secured in a manner prescribed by law. […]

Howell Plaza II v. DOT: 92 Wis.2d 74, 284 N.W.2d 887 (Wis. 1979) Absence of a Taking; Condemnation Blight Howell alleged inverse condemnation where Highway Commn announced path for future freeway Alignment would have traversed 50 acre undeveloped area of 60 acre larger commercial parcel. EIS for planned corridor not yet prepared After taking steps, Highway Commn terminated all efforts to purchase property citing challenges to the legality of the early acquisition process. Within one year, LO brought its claim for inverse condemnation LO Expert testified that LO unable to develop approx. remaining acres Issue: Was LO property taken or occupied?

Burden on LO to establish that governmental activities deprived LO of all or substantially all of the beneficial use of the property Howell Plaza II v. DOT: Cont In WI There Must Be A Taking before there can be claim for just compensation Incidental damages (a/k/a consequential damages) to property resulting from governmental activities, or laws passed in the promotion of the public welfare, is not considered a taking of the property for which compensation must be made WI Constitution, like its federal equivalent does not undertake … to socialize all losses, but [only] those which result from a taking of property. There need not be a physical occupation or possession by [the state] for there to be a compensable taking Broad Rule: The fact that LO suffered a loss as a result of the announcement and initial planning of a public improvement has not generally been held to constitute a taking of property

Howell Plaza II v. DOT: Cont Held: [The] uncertainty […] often a result of a planned, public improvement which requires the eventual acquisition of private property […] does not constitute a taking of all or substantially all of the beneficial use of the property. Judgment of the circuit court – Affirmed. But Compare: Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda, 789 N.W.2d 860 (Mn 2010)

Procedure for Available Appeals in Wisconsin Right of Condemnation – a/k/a, Right to Take Appeal for Greater Compensation: Appeal from Conveyance, or Appeal from Award of Damages Inverse Condemnation, a/k/a, Condemnation Proceedings Instituted By Property Owner Relocation Drainage Claims

Condemnee Litigation Expenses – The Great WI Fee Shifting Provision Litigation Expenses defined as the sum of all costs, disbursements and expenses, including reasonable attorney, appraisal and engineering fees necessary to prepare for or participate in actual or anticipated proceedings before the condemnation commissioners, board of assessment or any court Condemnee Standard to prevail : commission award, court or jury verdict exceeds the jurisdictional offer or the highest written offer prior to the JO by at least $700 and at least 15% Liability for fees accrues 14 days after date of taking and includes interest

Appeals for Greater Compensation: Two Approaches I. Appeal from conveyance (Deed) Must be brought within 6 months after recording Amount of compensation treated as the award Date of recording treated as the date of taking and the date of evaluation Right of appeal granted to all listed parties with an interest of record, e.g., mortgages, liens, long term tenancies II. Appeal from Award of Damages Must be brought not later than 2 years from the date of taking, as defined above Right of appeal granted to all listed parties with an interest of record, e.g., mortgages, liens, long term tenancies

Court Action to Contest Right of Condemnation, a/k/a, Right to Take Must be brought within 40 days of service of the Jurisdictional Offer Allows LO to Challenge the right of the condemnor to condemn the property described in the JO for any reason other than that the amount of compensation is inadequate Trial of the issues to be given precedence over all other actions in [the circuit court] not then on trial. Prevailing LO awarded litigation expenses

Condemnation Proceedings Instituted By Property Owner – a/k/a, Inverse Condemnation Action commenced by verified petition: Shall describe the land being occupied Shall be served upon the person occupying the land Requires court to make a finding of occupation without having the right to do so – i.e., a trespass Matter will be treated as though LO received a JO and has failed to accept, and assumes LO not questioning the right to take Successful LO eligible to collect litigation fees under fee shifting provisions 6 year limitations period applies. BOP on LO to establish commencement date

Relocation Claims: Mixture of Administrative Review and Direct Court Proceedings Optional procedure: for Displacee to appeal claim denial for review by Wis. Dept. of Admin. – agency with program oversight – mediation model Initial claim filed with condemnor Claim to be filed after damages have fully materialized but not later than two (2) years after condemnor takes physical possession of the property If claim not allowed within 90 days after the filing, claimant has right of action against condemnor Right of Action in Circuit Court: Note: Such lawsuits falloutside WIs litigation fee shifting provisions

Drainage or Flooding Claims Must be brought within 3 years after alleged damage occurred Claimant must file claim with govt agency W/n 90 days of claim, agency must: Correct the cause Acquire the flooding rights Deny the claim Thereafter, matter proceeds under inverse condemnation procedure Suit is for such other relief, other than damages, as may be just and equitable.

Wisconsins Acquisition and Litigation Statistics

Wisconsins Litigation Payments