Patent Litigation in India

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Richard J. Berman, Partner Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC
Advertisements

1 Patent Infringement Litigation Before the U.S. International Trade Commission By Timothy DeWitt 24IP Law Group USA 12 E. Lake Dr. Annapolis, MD
2 ND WIPO INTER-REGIONAL MEETING ON SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION ON PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND ENFORCEMENT CAIRO.
From Invention to Patent -Patents as Tool for Economic Success- WIPO – INSME International Training Program IP and Management of Innovation in SMEs May.
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business Anil Sinha, Counsellor, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA Lawrence T. Welch Eli Lilly and Company.
WISACCA – 2014 Annual Conference
The Intellectual Property Rights Regime in India & US: The Evolving Landscape February 15, 2014, The Hyatt Regency Hotel, New Delhi D. CALAB GABRIEL.
PATENT PRACTICE and LTIGATION IN JAPAN OHNO & PARTNERS Attorney-at-law admitted in JAPAN and N.Y.
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
Update on Alabama Appellate Practice & Procedure: Avoiding Malpractice When Handling Appeals DEBORAH ALLEY SMITH.
The UPC in the European Patent Litigation landscape
What You Need to Know About Biosimilars: Products, Recent Deals, IP Issues and Licensing August 2, 2012 Madison C. Jellins 1.
MATCHING PROCEDURES WITH GOALS C. Graham Gerst
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
Patent System in India At Asia Pacific LES Conference- Hangzhou By Rahul Vartak LES - INDIA Partner, Krishna & Saurastri Associates 16 th October, 2013.
© 2005 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Offense as Defense in U.S. Patent Litigation Anthony L. Press Maximizing IP Seminar October 31, 2005.
Greg Gardella Patent Reexamination: Effective Strategy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Proceedings.
Ch. 5-3 Civil Procedure.
Drugs which are not patentable
Introduction to the IPEC small claims track
©2002 Marger Johnson & McCollom PC, All Rights Reserved. Intellectual Property Presentation for 2002 High Technology Protection Summit Presented by Alexander.
EBay vs. MercExchange IEOR 190 G 3/16/2009Rani. eBay vs. MercExchange (May 2006) With eBay, (Supreme Court unanimously decided that) Injunctions should.
A New Pathway for Follow-on Biologics Presented by: Steve Nash May 7, 2010.
1 Interlocutory Injunctions in IP Disputes in Australia Frank Di Giantomasso Knightsbridge Lawyers Knightsbridge Patent Attorneys Eurojuris Annual Congress.
The use of TRIPS flexibilities to protect health in South Africa and the opportunities for pro-public health reform of national legislation Nokhwezi Hoboyi.
Patent Litigaton Strategies in Israel Reuven Behar, partner Fischer Behar Chen & Co.
TRIPS Flexibilities Preventive Measures Johanna von Braun, PhD University of Cape Town, South Africa Kiev, 21/22 nd June, 2010.
1 Free trade agreements – Australia’s experience Sanya Smith Third World Network 25 August 2006 Bangkok.
SBZL IP LAW FIRM We bring IP Patent & Trademark Protection in CHINA.
Civil Law in Action Wednesday 17 August Court hierarchy Review: What are the advantages of having a court hierarchy?
Handling IP Disputes in a Global Economy Huw Evans Norton Rose Fulbright LLP.
H I R S C H & P A R T N E R S A v o c a t S o l i c i t o r R e c h t s a n w a l t Pharmaceutical settlement agreements and competition law A litigation.
ENFORCEMENT OF IP RIGHTS – INFRINGEMENT SEIZURE IN FRANCE Didier Intès French & European Patent attorney AIPPI – November 7, 2013.
EXCLUSIVE MARKETING RIGHTS & MAIL-BOX APPLICATIONS BY Manish Kumar Prusty T. Harish.
2011 Japanese Patent Law Revision AIPLA Annual Meeting October 21, 2011 Yoshi Inaba TMI Associates.
4-1 Chapter 4— Litigation REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
PATENT OPPOSITION AND STRATEGY Essenese Obhan, Obhan & Associates.
Caraco Pharmaceuticals Vs. Novo Nordisk The case of unclear and unfair patenting of generic drugs.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Mainland, Hong Kong SAR and Macau SAR Intellectual Property Symposium 2003 China Intellectual Property Training Center, Beijing THEME :Judicial Protection.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Basics of Patent Infringement Litigation UC Berkeley Patent Innovation and Strategy Dr. Tal Lavian November 24, 2008.
UNCTAD/CD-TFT 1 Exclusive Rights and Public Access – Flexibilities in International Agreements and Development Objectives The Public Health Example 21.
Intellectual Property Rights and Pharmaceuticals (Case study- Novartis’s claim in India) Background note prepared for PHM Vic Internet Workshop.
Principles of International Commercial Arbitration Allen B. Green McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association The Presumption of Patent Validity in the U.S. Tom Engellenner AIPLA Presentation to.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
Judicial Branch Chapter 11: The Federal Court System.
The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.
Adv.Pat.Sem rjmWeek 041 Agenda – Week 4- 9/27/05 Con. Law: 11 th Amendment. State Sovereign Immunity Con. Law: 7 th Amendment. Trial by Jury. Federal.
The Organization of the Federal Courts Vocabulary: 1.Court of Appeals 2.Circuit Courts.
Trends Relating to Patent Infringement Litigation in JAPAN
CASE MANAGEMENT & COURT MANAGEMENT - Roshan Dalvi.
The Organization of The Federal Courts Chapter 10 Section 2.
Civil Law Civil Law – is also considered private law as it is between individuals. It may also be called “Tort” Law, as a tort is a wrong committed against.
India’s Patent Path. Srividhya Ragavan Associate Professor of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law.
Patent Enforcement & Forum Shopping in China Liu, Shen & Associates: Jun Qiu September 2014.
Patent Information – The Key to Attack and Defend Heinz Mueller Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property / ip-search London IP Summit October.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 3 – The Patent Owner Preliminary Response 1.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 12 – PTAB Popularity and Reasons
© 2006 Brett J. Trout Patent Reform Act of 2005 © 2006 Brett J. Trout
How To Find and Read the Law and Live to Tell (and Talk) About It
Interlocutory Injunctions in IP Disputes in Australia
Samsung vs. Apple, Inc. First US trial verdict – Aug 24, 2012
Describe the procedures for a Civil case
Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA
Studio Legale Sena e Tarchini
Injunctions: Still the right remedy?
& LAIPLA Spring Seminar
Presentation transcript:

Patent Litigation in India Pravin Anand Anand And Anand MIP International Patent Forum 2011 April 5, 2011, London

The Challenges… First, a weak Patent Law Pre and post grant oppositions (Span case) Rigid deadlines (4) Section 3(d) - Novartis Section 8 - Chemtura Working requirements , Compulsory licence Section 39

The Challenges… Second, Generics, Copyleft, open-source aggressive: Parliamentary Forums Judge training Press/Blogs No counter measures by innovators

The Challenges… Third, top ten filers are chemistry patents World trend: top filers are IT companies Being an IT Power, ironic that Chemistry leads Generics – very patent savvy..

The Changes… 2005 Patent Amendments CPC – Streamlining Processes Supreme Court – 4 month orders (20 in 2010) Delhi High Court – 70% IP cases Docket Management Old order – 5 to 10 years Today – possibly 6 months to one year

e Court

Remedies Revolution Ex parte injunctions – before launch “status quo” Expedited trial preferred Anton Piller, Mareva Injunctions John Doe Orders Damages : Punitive / Exemplary (65 orders)

Time Inc vs. Lokesh Srivastava Red Border contributed to finding of dishonesty Punitive/ exemplary damages granted for the first time

Strategies Design action before launch Emphasis on original documents Issues : Document : Witness analysis – cannot miss the document window in fast track Expert evidence of great value ( average – 2 witnesses per side, 6 hours cross, 150 ques) Emphasis on original documents Section 65 – Secondary evidence Section 65 B – Internet downloads

Strategies Invalidation before IPAB or counter claim before High Court IPAB slow High Court Fast May avoid cease & desist notice Amendments allowed - infringement action or after invalidation

Strategies Judges Rely on foreign case law – favorable decisions elsewhere help – gestalt perception judges often, a third force Generics look at prosecution histories all over – EPO highly respected Suppression –big cause for failure - overstate

Strategies Demystify the science Use the defendants patent applications for estoppel arguments Highlight Public Interest, pricing, patient access, investment in drug development Avoid Interim – move to Fast track

Cases Novartis Gleevec Supreme Court (19th April) Roche vs Cipla – final Arguments (April) GSK vs Union of India – writ quashed publication United Phosphorus – pesticide formulation – suit decreed 34 days 20 other suits of BMS, Sanofi Aventis, Scherring Plough etc likely to conclude in 2011

Conclusions Despite the weak legislation, major positive changes Bulk decisions in 2011 will show the long lasting trends Other high courts may be positively impacted – time will tell..