Fine Particulate Air Monitoring

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the.
Advertisements

Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 3 Air Quality.
Advanced Sampling and Data Analysis for Source Attribution of Ambient Particulate Arsenic and Other Air Toxics Metals in St. Louis Missouri Department.
Welcome to the AQS Monitor Metadata Webinar Dec. 13, 2013 You are connected to the on-line portion of the webinar. The audio is being hosted via a phone.
AIR POLLUTION IN THE US : Ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) are the two main pollutants 75 ppb (8-h average) 15  g m -3 (1-y av.)
AIRNOW A New Way to Look at the Atmosphere Template Presentation for Regional Toolkit.
EPA Update- Bob Judge Maine Air Quality Monitoring Committee April 18, ) NAAQS schedule 2) Budget 3) Technical Systems Audit.
1 Johnson Nixon Ford Carter Reagan Bush Clinton Bush.
Celebrating Our Success David K. Paylor, Director Environment Virginia April 2013.
DEQ Air Quality Web Page – Real-time Ozone and PM 2.5 Data.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A Management of Air Quality Monitoring Data Debbie Miller National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
AQS Development and Enhancement Plans AQS Development and Enhancement Plans AQS CONFERENCE Jake Summers June 9, 2010.
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
Staff Report Spring Business Meeting 2010 Denver, Colorado.
The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy and Network Design Westar Spring 2007 Business Meeting April 4, 2007 Bruce Louks, Idaho Department of Environmental.
Inter-Tribal Environmental Council (ITEC) Clean Air Projects
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
Ozone Update Ben Wells U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Analysis Group February 11, 2014.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For AMTAC April 12, 2011 Kate Hoag – US EPA, Region 9.
Status of the Particulate Matter (PM) Air Quality Standards November 28, 2012.
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
Fine Particulate Matter SIP for Washington DC Special Stakeholder Meeting February 20, 2008.
Feedback Loops Andrew McCarthy. Purpose of Feedback The primary reason for feedback control is to measure and compensate for the effect of disturbances.
LEADS/EMS DATA VALIDATION IPS MeteoStar December 11, 2006 WHAT IS VALIDATION? From The Dictionary: 1a. To Make Legally Valid 1b. To Grant Official.
Take a deep breath! Please read the board. Please find your notes from yesterday.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Grants and Guidance (2) 2015 Spring Grants/Planning Meeting 5/21/20151 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Current developments of the CLRTAP Gothenburg protocol Stefan Åström, IVL.
‘Air Monitoring and Protection Strategies in EECCA’ UNECE/WGEMA Workshop, Geneva, 11 June 2007 Dr Hans-Guido Mücke for the WHO European Centre for Environment.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
UN Environment Assembly Adopts Resolution to strengthen UNEP’s Air Quality work
Shawn McClure, Rodger Ames and Doug Fox - CIRA
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
What is Software Test Automation?
Guidelines for NSPRC Presentations
Steve Page Office Director, OAQPS NACAA Spring Meeting 2010
How to Develop a Risk Management System in Your Library
In This Week’s “The EDGE”
SEPA AND EEA, FIVE YEARS OF COOPERATION
DEQ Air Quality Web Page – Real-time Ozone and PM2.5 Data
Structures for Implementation
WAQS Monitoring Network Assessment
Entering Data into AQS:
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Air Quality Monitoring Networks
in US East Coast Using SMAT-CE Software
Champion Program Plan Template
Air Quality in Europe – 2017 report
Satellite NO2 Monitoring over the Oil Sands Region (video)
Why Monitor Air Quality?
Request for Proposals Q&A Webcast - February 2009
Leroy Williams GRIC DEQ Air Program
Middle East.
School Monitoring Initiative Early Results & Status
Budget and Planning Update
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
Facilitated/Presented by:
NESCAUM MAC MEETING October 17, 2007
Implementing Region 10 Air Directors Funding Decision
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Regional Issues NESCAUM Meeting May 16, 2006.
AB 617 Community Air Protection Program
WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations
Restoration & Monitoring Prioritization Tool
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
EPA FY2008 Air Monitoring Budget Guidance
Fall 2016/Spring 2017 Administrative Review Process Update
Presentation transcript:

Fine Particulate Air Monitoring STAPPA/ALAPCO Fine Particulate Air Monitoring Improvements in Data Collection and Reporting Spring Membership Meeting 2002

PM 2.5 Data Completeness Report Card Improvements in collection and reporting SAMWG and EPA Working Together State and Local Agency efforts Noteworthy results in 2001 1103 station operated all 4 quarters No systematic equipment issues AQS issues being resolved Continued focus is warranted for all pollutants.

Current 2001 reporting by EPA Region

Data from AQS on April 15, 2002

Look for an MSA update on AIRWEB in May. Many of the 80 sites are redundant within an MSA’s with complete data showing >15.0 annual average.

Continuous PM2.5 Monitoring Sites As of AIRS, 10/02/01 Black = Data reported in AIRS (132) Red = Site registered in AIRS but no data (20) 215 were funded in FY2000 (-83) Fortunately, Continuous particulate monitors have begun to be recognized as important tools in Air Quality Monitoring. EPA has responded by funding 215, PM 2.5 real-time sites across the Country in 2000 and given the new National Monitoring Strategy, I am hopeful that the trend will continue and even grow. Note however, that 83 of the funded sites are not reporting any data to AIRS. We do not have answers as to why that is and hope that it can be resolved quickly. If there are issues that SAMWG assist with please lets us know and we will endeavor to help.

As of Dec 2001

National PM2.5 Maps Yearly depictions Relative to the Annual NAAQS Summary 1999-2001

Data from AQS on April 5, 2002

Data from AQS on April 5, 2002

Data from AQS on April 5, 2002

Data from AQS on April 5, 2002

A closer view of eastern US for 99-01 average Data from AQS on April 5, 2002

Keys to Success Refine networks for efficient operation Improvement as AQS matures Reinforce expectations for timely reporting Focus on new equipment issues