Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using t-tests Basic introduction and 1-sample t-tests Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Spring 2010.
Advertisements

Comparing One Sample to its Population
Independent Samples and Paired Samples t-tests PSY440 June 24, 2008.
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Spring 2005 Using t-tests.
Making estimations Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Spring 2010.
H1H1 H1H1 HoHo Z = 0 Two Tailed test. Z score where 2.5% of the distribution lies in the tail: Z = Critical value for a two tailed test.
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics Psychology
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics Psychology
Lecture #24 Thursday, November 10, 2016 Textbook: 13.1 through 13.6
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200 - Lecture Section 001, Spring 2017 Room 150 Harvill Building 9:00 - 9:50 Mondays, Wednesdays.
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Hypothesis Testing: One Sample Cases
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200 - Lecture Section 001, Fall 2016 Room 150 Harvill Building 10: :50 Mondays, Wednesdays.
Statistics for the Social Sciences
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing
Physics- atmospheric Sciences (PAS) - Room 201
Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing with Two Samples.
Statistics 200 Objectives:
Central Limit Theorem, z-tests, & t-tests
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Hypothesis Tests for a Population Mean in Practice
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Hand in your Homework Assignment.
Elementary Statistics
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Elementary Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
STAT Z-Tests and Confidence Intervals for a
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Analysis and Interpretation of Experimental Findings
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing
WARM - UP The following represents snowfall amounts for 8 random winters in Detroit. 78” 130” 140” 120” 108” 120” 156” 101” 1. Fill in all four.
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200 - Lecture Section 001, Fall 2018 Room 150 Harvill Building 10: :50 Mondays, Wednesdays.
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Intro to Confidence Intervals Introduction to Inference
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics 2018

Annoucements Quiz 9, due on Friday On-line course evaluations Look for an email (Monday morning) with a link to take the on-line course evaluations. Please take 10 mins. or so to provide feedback. Annoucements

Inferential statistics Hypothesis testing Testing claims about populations (and the effect of variables) based on data collected from samples Estimation Using sample statistics to estimate the population parameters Inferential statistics used to generalize back Sampling to make data collection manageable Population Sample Inferential statistics

Estimation Summary Design Estimation (Estimated) Standard error One sample, σ known One sample, σ unknown Two related samples, σ unknown Two independent samples, σ unknown Things to note: The design drives the formula used The standard error differs depending on the design (kind of comparison) Sample size plays a role in SE formula and in df’s of the critical value Level of confidence comes in with the critical value used Estimation Summary

Estimation in other designs Two kinds of estimates that use the same basic procedure Computing the point estimate or the confidence interval: Step 1: Take your “reasonable” estimate for your test statistic Step 2: Put it into the formula Step 3: Solve for the unknown population parameter Center/point estimate? How do we find this? How do we find this? Depends on the design (what is being estimated) Use the t-table & your confidence level Depends on the design Estimation in other designs

Estimates with t-scores Confidence intervals always involve + a margin of error This is similar to a two-tailed test, so in the t-table, always use the “proportion in two tails” heading, and select the α-level corresponding to (1 - Confidence level) What is the tcrit needed for a 95% confidence interval? 2.5% so two tails with 2.5% in each 2.5%+2.5% = 5% or α = 0.05, so look here 95% 95% in middle Estimates with t-scores

Estimation in one sample-t Estimating the difference between the population mean and the sample mean based when the population standard deviation is not known Confidence interval Diff. Expected by chance Estimation in one sample-t

Estimation in one sample t-design Make an interval estimate with 95% confidence of the population mean given a sample with a X = 85, n = 25, and a sample s = 5. What two critical t-scores do 95% of the data lie between? So the confidence interval is: 82.94 to 87.06 From the table: tcrit =+2.064 or 85 ± 2.064 2.5% 95% Estimation in one sample t-design

Estimation in related samples design Estimating the difference between two population means based on two related samples Confidence interval Diff. Expected by chance Estimation in related samples design

Estimation in related samples design Dr. S. Beach reported on the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy as a treatment for anorexia. He examined 12 patients, weighing each of them before and after the treatment. Estimate the average population weight gain for those undergoing the treatment with 90% confidence. Differences (post treatment - pre treatment weights): 10, 6, 3, 23, 18, 17, 0, 4, 21, 10, -2, 10 Related samples estimation Confidence level 90% CI(90%)= 5.72 to 14.28 Estimation in related samples design

Estimation in independent samples design Estimating the difference between two population means based on two independent samples Confidence interval Diff. Expected by chance Estimation in independent samples design

Estimation in independent samples design Dr. Mnemonic develops a new treatment for patients with a memory disorder. He randomly assigns 8 patients to one of two samples. He then gives one sample (A) the new treatment but not the other (B) and then tests both groups with a memory test. Estimate the population difference between the two groups with 95% confidence. Independent samples t-test situation Confidence level 95% CI(95%)= -8.73to 19.73 Estimation in independent samples design

Estimation Summary Design Estimation (Estimated) Standard error One sample, σ known One sample, σ unknown Two related samples, σ unknown Two independent samples, σ unknown Things to note: The design drives the formula used The standard error differs depending on the design (kind of comparison) Sample size plays a role in SE formula and in df’s of the critical value Level of confidence comes in with the critical value used Estimation Summary

Estimation in independent samples design Dr. Mnemonic develops a new treatment for patients with a memory disorder. He randomly assigns 8 patients to one of two samples. He then gives one sample (A) the new treatment but not the other (B) and then tests both groups with a memory test. Estimate the population difference between the two groups with 95% confidence. If we had instead done a hypothesis test with an α = 0.05, what would you expect our conclusion to be? - Fail to reject the H0 Independent samples t-test situation CI(95%)= -8.73to 19.73 Confidence level 95% -8.73 19.73 Notice that this interval includes zero So the estimate of the population mean difference includes the possibility of zero (“no difference”) Estimation in independent samples design

Error bars Two types typically Standard Error (SE) diff by chance Confidence Intervals (CI) A range of plausible estimates of the population mean CI: μ = (X) ± (tcrit) (diff by chance) Note: Make sure that you label your graphs, let the reader know what your error bars are Error bars

Error Bars: Reporting CIs Important point! In text (APA style) example M = 30.5 cm, 95% CI [18.0, 42.0] In graphs as error bars In tables (see more examples in APA manual) Error Bars: Reporting CIs

Hypothesis testing & p-values Some argue that CIs are more informative than p-values Hypothesis testing & p-values Dichotomous thinking Yes/No reject H0 (remember H0 is “no effect”) Neyman-Pearson approach Strength of evidence Fisher approach Confidence Intervals Gives plausible estimates of the pop parameter (values outside are implausible) Provide information about both level and variability Wide intervals can indicate low power Good for emphasizing comparisons across studies (e.g., meta-analytic thinking) Can also be used for Yes/No reject H0 Estimation: Why?

In labs Practice computing and interpreting confidence intervals Understanding CI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFWsuO9f74o Calculating CI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4SRdaTycaw Kahn Academy: CI and sample size: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4KDLWENXm0 CI and t-test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV4pdjHCKuA CI for Ind Samp: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxZ6uooEJOk (pt 2) CI and margin of error: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UogOJHgJDqs HT and CI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1at8VukIbw HT vs. CI rap: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C88fUKAHPn0 CIs by Geoff Cumming: Introduction to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK6DXfXv8BM Workshop (6 part series) In labs

Hypothesis testing with CIs If we had instead done a hypothesis test on 2 independent samples with an α = 0.05, what would you expect our conclusion to be? H0: “there is no difference between the groups” MD = 2.23, t(34) = 1.25, p = 0.22 - Fail to reject the H0 -1.4 5.9 MD = 2.23, 95% CI [-1.4, 5.9] Hypothesis testing with CIs

Hypothesis testing with CIs If we had instead done a hypothesis test on 2 independent samples with an α = 0.05, what would you expect our conclusion to be? H0: “there is no difference between the groups” MD = 2.23, t(34) = 1.25, p = 0.22 - Fail to reject the H0 -1.4 5.9 MD = 2.23, 95% CI [-1.4, 5.9] MD = 3.61, 95% CI [0.6, 6.6] 0.6 6.6 - reject the H0 MD = 3.61, t(42) = 2.43, p = 0.02 Hypothesis testing with CIs

Group Differences: 95%CI Rule of Thumb Error bars can be informative about group differences, but you have to know what to look for Rule of thumb for 95% CIs*: If the overlap is about half of one one-sided error bar, the difference is significant at ~ p < .05 If the error bars just abut, the difference is significant at ~ p< .01 *works if n > 10 and error bars don’t differ by more than a factor of 2 Cumming & Finch, 2005 Error Bars: Reporting CIs