Behind the Fence and Contract Change Stakeholder Update September 18, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

DEFINITION Insurance policy is an evidence of insurance issued to the insured by the insurer, an evidence of lodging and accepting a claim and an important.
2004 NERC, NPCC & New England Compliance Programs John Norden Manager, Operations Training, Documentation & Compliance August 31, 2003 RC Meeting.
Demystifying 6.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
1 RXQ Customer Drop Submitted by Supplier Process Flow Diagram Customer Supplier Distribution Company Supplier sends Drop Request to Distribution.
RXQ Dual Billing Process Flow Distribution Company Supplier Customer Distribution Company reads meter(s) ( ) Supplier receives and processes.
REQ Enrollment in Demand Response Programs Process Flow Engineering Firm Retail Customer Demand Response Service Provider (DRSP) Distribution Company.
REQ Drop from Demand Response Programs Process Flow Retail Customer Demand Response Service Provider (DRSP) Distribution Company 1 Drop Request.
Document #07-12G 1 RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent Process Flow Diagram (Switch) Customer Supplier Customer authorizes Enrollment.
RXQ Dual Billing Process Flow Distribution Company Supplier Customer Distribution Company reads meter(s) ( ) Supplier receives and processes.
National Thousands Block Number Pooling Services NANC Meeting November 5, 2003.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
WECC Board of Directors April 21-23, 2004 Seattle, Washington WECC Procedure for Reporting of System Events Disturbance Reports Rod Maslowski OC Vice Chairperson.
WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
Standards Development and Approval Process Steve Rueckert Director of Standards Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake.
1 TSS Report PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 26-27, 2006.
1 Harmonisation of requirements: where we are Erik Waterdrinker, IFAH-Europe 2nd Veterinary Workshop on E-submission 4 Dec 2009, EMEA, London.
Tutorial for leadership teams of ITU-T study groups, TSAG, tariff groups and focus groups Alternative approval process (AAP) for ITU-T Recommendations.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 Contracts, Competitive Bids 2004 USAC E-rate for Beginners 2004 USAC E-rate from the Service Provider Perspective FCC Orders.
3/2/ STANLEY LIGAS, et al. v. JULIE HAMOS, et al. First Annual Report of the Monitor September 27, 2012 Tony Records, Monitor
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Xchanging ePolicies Overview of Service Offering and Willis Service Usage Experience Presented by : Helen Dines (Willis) Jon Faulkner (Xchanging) Date:
Grants 3.0 Departmental Administrator Review January 22, 2014.
1 SLIDE Insurance Company Regulation Division Insurance Market Regulation Division Medical Professional Liability Insurance Claim Reports Online Claim.
1 Charter Schools - Site and Plan Approval School Facilities Planning Division Liese Olukoya, Consultant.
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews May 15, 2008 Bruce Robinson FTA Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
Office of Operations 2010 Fall Conference State Agency Compliance with Prompt Contracting Regulation Dan Agosto, John Moriarty & Patricia ODonnell.
Are there funds to deobligate? (Block 5) ( )
Contents Introduction and Background The Objective Recommendations
New York City Department of Education Charter Matching – Facilities Upgrades/ Capital Improvements – FY 2014.
Photo by Karl Steinbrenner Charge Card Supervisor/Reviewer Training 2014.
1 A Global Growth Fund Program. Ontario Chamber of Commerce 60,000 members through 160 independent chambers of commerce and boards of trade province wide.
AEMCPAGE Relaunch 1 June 2009.
Department of Finance and Administration Office of the Mississippi Management and Reporting System 1 MAGIC Implementation Services Discussion February.
© S Haughton more than 3?
New EU Rules on Derivatives Trading The EMIR Reporting Technical Standards Victoria Cooley OTC Derivatives & Post Trade Policy Financial Conduct Authority.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
ENGLISH – LEVEL VI Week IV – Lesson
Welcome to MiCTA Learn about MiCTA’s National E- Rate Program.
Welcome to MiCTA Learn about MiCTA’s National E- Rate Program.
Clinical Trial Agreements
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Capacity Allocation & Congestion Management Network Codes Stakeholder Meeting 3 July 2012 Introduction & Overview \
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
1 Validation and registration Verification and issuance Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 20 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
Offsite Storage RAF/2013/00023 Compulsory Briefing Session 16 August 2013 The Road Accident Fund.
John Zammit-Haber National Grid
COMPLIANCE WITH GRANT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES TxDot Grant Fund Project.
FIRST 5 LA Baby-Friendly Hospital Project New Contractor Orientation September 20, 2011.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Performance Targets for the Customer Interconnection Process January, 2008.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Transition of Authoritative Documents – Information Session September 2009 Doyle Sullivan Evelyn Kelly.
Presentation transcript:

Behind the Fence and Contract Change Stakeholder Update September 18, 2012

Agenda AESO projects in 2012 Behind the Fence Process Contract Changes Process Information on AESO Website Questions 2 Proprietary

Behind the Fence What is a Behind the Fence project? –Previously connected to the AIES –Equipment changes or modifications to an existing site –Industrial Service Designation (ISD) –No changes to transmission –Need Identification Document is not required –The Market Participant (MP) is the Transmission Facility Owner (TFO) –Connection queue business practices do not apply 3 Proprietary

Behind the Fence Projects Behind the Fence Guidelines and Project Types: –Standard –Abbreviated –Emergency 4 Proprietary

Behind the Fence Process Stage 0 Key Activities: –MP submits SASR to AESO OR –MP notifies the AESO of required equipment changes for emergency/abbreviated BTF projects –AESO evaluates project type –MP resolves any data deficiencies if required Stage 0 Gate Requirements: –SASR is complete 5 Proprietary

Behind the Fence Process Stage 1 Key Activities: –Project kick-off and project expectations discussed –BTF study scope/plan completed –Identify AESO/MP/consultant –Submit Stage 1 Project Data Update Package (PDUP) Stage 1 Gate Requirements: –BTF study scope/plan signed by all parties as required –Stage 1 Project Data Update Package is accepted –Non-disclosure agreement in place if consultant will perform studies 6 Proprietary

Behind the Fence Process Stage 2 Key Activities: –MP completes BTF/connection proposal –Functional specification initiated –GUOC letter issued to MP –Confirm contract changes can proceed, as required –Submit Stage 2 PDUP –AESO issues letter of project endorsement to AUC Stage 2 Gate Requirements: –AESO accepts BTF/connection proposal –Stage 2 PDUP is accepted 7 Proprietary

Behind the Fence Process Stage 3/4 Key Activities: –Generators file generator application with AUC –Loss factors provided for generators Stage 3/4 Gate Requirements: –Functional specification executed and stamped –AUC generator facility application confirmed (If not previously filed by MP) 8 Proprietary

Behind the Fence Process Stage 5 Key Activities: –Equipment change/maintenance –AESO/MP initiates and completes energization checklist –Submit Stage 5 PDUP –GUOC paid 30 days prior Stage 5 Gate Requirements: –Energization checklist issued –AESO operating procedures created, amended and approved –System Access Service (SAS) –Stage 5 PDUP –GUOC contribution paid 9 Proprietary

Behind the Fence Process Stage 6 Key Activities: –Generator commissioning period –Generators submit validation report to WECC –Commissioning certificate issued –AESO closes project Stage 6 Gate Requirements: –Energization checklist issued and approved –Commissioning certificate issued to generators –No deficiencies outstanding –AESO project closure checklist completed 10 Energizeand Close-out Proprietary

Contract Changes What is a Contract Change? –Market Participants seeking changes to existing contracts Increase Reduction Termination –No changes to transmission –No equipment changes or modifications 11 Proprietary

Contract Changes Stage 0 Key Activities: –MP submits SASR to AESO –AESO reviews SASR for completeness –MP resolves any data deficiencies if required –Project is created Stage 0 Gate Requirements: –SASR is complete 12 Increase and Reduction Proprietary

Contract Changes Stage 1 Key Activities: –Project kick-off and project expectations discussed –Contract study scope identify AESO/MP/consultant Stage 1 Gate Requirements: –Non-disclosure agreement in place if consultant will perform studies –Study scope signed by all parties 13 Increase Only Proprietary

Contract Changes Stage 2 Key Activities: –Complete capacity studies, as required –Confirm contract request can proceed –Contract Acceptance Letter issued and accepted –Project CCD updated –GUOC recalculated (STS only) Stage 2 Gate Requirements: –AESO accepts study results, if completed by consultant –Contract capacity confirmed –Contract Acceptance Letter signed, as required 14 Increase Proprietary

Contract Changes Stage 2 Key Activities and Stage 2 Gate Requirements: –Project CCD updated –Contract Acceptance Letter signed 15 Reduction Proprietary

Contract Changes Stage 3/4/5 Contract Increase Review: –When capacity requests cant be accommodated, contracts will not proceed until updated capacity studies confirm the contract can proceed –Requested capacity will be reviewed every six (6) months –When requested capacity can be accommodated, the AESO will issue an updated Contract Acceptance Letter to confirm the request should proceed –CCD and GUOC to be updated 16 Proprietary

Contract Changes Stage 3/4/5 Key Activities: –MP invoiced for contract increase/reduction calculation –SAS agreement signed no later than five weeks prior to new effective date of operation Stage 3/4/5 Gate Requirements: –SAS contract signed 17 Increase and Reduction Proprietary

Contract Changes Stage 6 Key Activities: –AESO closes project Stage 6 Gate Requirements: –AESO Project Closeout Checklist completed 18 Increase and Reduction Proprietary

Information on the AESO Website Project List Connection Queue Updated Behind the Fence process Updated contract process overview 19

Questions?