Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Advertisements

SMK-1, an Essential Regulator of DAF-16-Mediated Longevity
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Inhibition of Respiration Extends C
Infection-Induced Intestinal Oxidative Stress Triggers Organ-to-Organ Immunological Communication in Drosophila  Shih-Cheng Wu, Chih-Wei Liao, Rong-Long.
Kiho Lee, Eleftherios Mylonakis  Cell Reports 
Tissue-Specific Activities of C
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Hyunsun Jo, Jiwon Shim, Jung Hyun Lee, Junho Lee, Jae Bum Kim 
Glucose Shortens the Life Span of C
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 136, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
Proline Catabolism Modulates Innate Immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Systematic Analysis of Tissue-Restricted miRISCs Reveals a Broad Role for MicroRNAs in Suppressing Basal Activity of the C. elegans Pathogen Response 
Germ-Cell Loss Extends C
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 19, Pages (October 2014)
Lithium Promotes Longevity through GSK3/NRF2-Dependent Hormesis
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 13, Pages e6 (December 2018)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Cell-Nonautonomous Regulation of C. elegans Germ Cell Death by kri-1
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Conditioning Protects C
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Johnathan Labbadia, Richard I. Morimoto  Molecular Cell 
Silencing of the DNA Mismatch Repair Gene MLH1 Induced by Hypoxic Stress in a Pathway Dependent on the Histone Demethylase LSD1  Yuhong Lu, Narendra Wajapeyee,
Regulation of the Longevity Response to Temperature by Thermosensory Neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans  Seung-Jae Lee, Cynthia Kenyon  Current Biology 
RLE-1, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase, Regulates C
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 165, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Adaptive Capacity to Bacterial Diet Modulates Aging in C. elegans
Epigenetic Silencing Mediates Mitochondria Stress-Induced Longevity
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
XBP-1 Remodels Lipid Metabolism to Extend Longevity
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages e4 (April 2019)
Identification of a DAF-16 Transcriptional Target Gene, scl-1, that Regulates Longevity and Stress Resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans  Sadatsugu Ookuma,
by Felicia K. Ooi, and Veena Prahlad
Chen Wu, Michelle E. Watts, Lee L. Rubin  Cell Reports 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 1600-1610 (December 2013) Germline Signaling Mediates the Synergistically Prolonged Longevity Produced by Double Mutations in daf-2 and rsks-1 in C. elegans  Di Chen, Patrick Wai-Lun Li, Benjamin A. Goldstein, Waijiao Cai, Emma Lynn Thomas, Fen Chen, Alan E. Hubbard, Simon Melov, Pankaj Kapahi  Cell Reports  Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 1600-1610 (December 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.018 Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2013 5, 1600-1610DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Double Mutations in daf-2 and rsks-1 Lead to Synergistically Prolonged Longevity that Requires DAF-16 (A) The daf-2 rsks-1 double mutant showed synergistically prolonged longevity (454% extension compared with N2) that was dependent on DAF-16. (B) Inhibition of TOR by rapamycin led to increased lifespan extension in daf-2 compared with N2. Rapamycin (100 μM) extended N2 and daf-2 lifespan by 26% and 45%, respectively (log rank, p < 0.0001). Animals treated with the vehicle (DMSO) alone did not show a significantly affected lifespan (log rank, p > 0.05). Quantitative data and statistical analyses are included in Table S1. (C) daf-2 rsks-1 animals showed significantly increased DAF-16 transcriptional activity. mRNA levels of DAF-16 targets that are either activated (sod-3 and hsp-12.3) or inhibited (sams-1) by DAF-16 were quantified by qRT-PCR. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate statistical differences using two-tailed t tests (∗∗∗p < 0.001). See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell Reports 2013 5, 1600-1610DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effects of daf-2 rsks-1 on Development, Reproduction, Stress Resistance, and DR (A) rsks-1 did not affect daf-2 dauer formation at 22.5°C. ns, not significant. (B) daf-2 rsks-1 animals showed delayed, prolonged, and overall reduced reproduction. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (C) daf-2 rsks-1 animals were more sensitive to heat stress (35°C) than daf-2 (log rank, p < 0.0001). (D) daf-2 rsks-1 animals were more resistant to oxidative stress by paraquat compared with daf-2 (∗∗p < 0.01, t test). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (E) daf-2 rsks-1 animals were more resistant to UV stress (2,000 J/m2) than daf-2 (log rank, p < 0.0001). (F) daf-2 rsks-1 animals showed significantly increased survival under DR by bacterial food deprivation compared with daf-2 (log rank, p < 0.0001). Cell Reports 2013 5, 1600-1610DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Synergistic Longevity Produced by daf-2 rsks-1 Is Mediated by Positive Feedback Regulation of DAF-16 via AMPK (A) Genes that are differentially expressed in daf-2 rsks-1 were identified by microarray analyses. (B) Identification of aakg-4 as a strong suppressor of daf-2 rsks-1. rsks-1-mediated lifespan extension in daf-2 (daf-2 versus daf-2 rsks-1): 89% in control RNAi and 18% in aakg-4 RNAi. (C) A deletion in aak-2 suppressed the synergistic longevity produced by daf-2 rsks-1. rsks-1-mediated lifespan extension in daf-2 (daf-2 versus daf-2 rsks-1): 85% with aak-2 and 18% without aak-2. Quantitative data and statistical analyses are included in Table S1. (D) The daf-2 rsks-1 double mutant showed further increased phosphorylation of AAK-2. Inhibition of aakg-4 significantly decreased AAK-2 phosphorylation in daf-2 rsks-1. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (E) The aak-2 deletion suppressed the significantly increased DAF-16 transcriptional activity in daf-2 rsks-1. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (F) Inhibition of aakg-4 in daf-2 rsks-1 reduced DAF-16 transcriptional activity. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (G) Model depicting the synergistic lifespan extension through positive feedback regulation of DAF-16 via AMPK. See also Figures S2 and S3, and Tables S2 and S3. Cell Reports 2013 5, 1600-1610DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Tissue-Specific Regulation of the Synergistically Prolonged Longevity Produced by daf-2 rsks-1 (A) Mean lifespan extension by rsks-1 RNAi knockdown in different tissues of daf-2 animals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (B) Changes in mean lifespan relative to control RNAi-treated animals by tissue-specific RNAi knockdown of daf-16, hsf-1, and aak-2 in daf-2 rsks-1. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Data from three independent experiments are shown. Survival curves are included in Figure S4. Quantitative data and statistical analyses are included in Table S1. See also Figure S6. Cell Reports 2013 5, 1600-1610DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Germline Signaling Modulates the daf-2 rsks-1-Mediated Synergistic Lifespan Extension through AMPK and DAF-16 (A) The glp-1(gf) mutation suppressed the synergistic longevity produced by daf-2 rsks-1. rsks-1-mediated lifespan extension in daf-2 (daf-2 versus daf-2 rsks-1): 86% without glp-1(gf) and 14% with glp-1(gf). (B) The glp-1(gf) mutation decreased phosphorylation of AAK-2 in daf-2 rsks-1. (C) The glp-1(gf) mutation suppressed the significantly increased DAF-16 transcriptional activity in daf-2 rsks-1. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (D) Inhibition of DAF-12 or KRI-1, essential mediators of germline signaling, significantly suppressed the synergistic longevity produced by daf-2 rsks-1 (log rank, p < 0.0001). Quantitative data and statistical analyses are included in Table S1. See also Figure S5. Cell Reports 2013 5, 1600-1610DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cell-Nonautonomous Activation of DAF-16 by rsks-1 RNAi Knockdown in the Germline (A) Activation of the DAF-16 target stdh-1 by rsks-1 RNAi in daf-2 and daf-2; rrf-1. rsks-1 RNAi knockdown in the germline of daf-2 animals (daf-2; rrf-1) significantly increased the intestinal expression of GFP driven by the stdh-1 promoter. Arrows indicate the anterior and posterior intestines. (B) Quantification of GFP expression driven by the stdh-1 promoter. Thirty animals were examined for each treatment. (C) Measurement of Pstdh-1::gfp expression by western blots with anti-GFP. (D) Quantification of GFP expression from western blots. Relative GFP levels were calculated by normalizing the intensities of GFP bands to Actin. The fold increase in Pstdh-1::gfp expression induced by rsks-1 RNAi was calculated by dividing the relative GFP levels in rsks-1 RNAi-treated animals by those in control RNAi-treated animals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗p < 0.01. The quantification was performed with four biological replicates. Cell Reports 2013 5, 1600-1610DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions