Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
Advertisements

Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan, Ellen Nalivaika, Celia A. Schiffer  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Xuewu Zhang, Jodi Gureasko, Kui Shen, Philip A. Cole, John Kuriyan 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2011)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Partial Agonists Activate PPARγ Using a Helix 12 Independent Mechanism
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Structural Basis of Swinholide A Binding to Actin
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Partial Agonists Activate PPARγ Using a Helix 12 Independent Mechanism
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structural Basis for Ligand Binding to the Guanidine-I Riboswitch
Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich 
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 897-905 (June 2008) A Specific Cholesterol Binding Site Is Established by the 2.8 Å Structure of the Human β2-Adrenergic Receptor  Michael A. Hanson, Vadim Cherezov, Mark T. Griffith, Christopher B. Roth, Veli-Pekka Jaakola, Ellen Y.T. Chien, Jeffrey Velasquez, Peter Kuhn, Raymond C. Stevens  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 897-905 (June 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.05.001 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview of the timβ2AR(E122W)-T4L Structure (A) The location of the tryptophan mutation is indicated, as well as the position of the ligand timolol. Two cholesterol molecules (orange) occupy roughly the same position as in the carβ2AR-T4L structure. Two lipid monoolein molecules (yellow) are located in the proximity of the E1223.41W mutation in a crystal-packing interface and one by helix I. The tilt angle between the receptor and T4L is markedly different between the timβ2AR(E122W)-T4L structure (green ribbon trace) and carβ2AR-T4L (blue ribbon trace). This intramolecular conformational change is likely due to an altered crystal-packing environment. (B) Timolol and carazolol are both shown and colored magenta and green, respectively. Intrareceptor polar interactions are represented by black dashed lines; receptor-ligand polar interactions are represented by red dashed lines. In addition to the interactions between Asp1133.32, Asn3127.39, and Tyr3167.43 and the oxypropanolamine tail of both ligands, the morpholino oxygen of timolol is within hydrogen-bonding distance of Asn2936.55, which has an altered side-chain rotamer relative to the carazolol-bound structure (orange side chains). Thus, the head group of timolol participates in a second hydrogen bonding network between Tyr3087.35, Asn2936.55 and Ser2045.43. In addition, the thiadiazole ring protrudes deeper into the binding pocket than the analogous ring of carazolol, allowing a stronger interaction between the thiadiazole group and Thr1183.37. Structure 2008 16, 897-905DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.001) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structural Evidence for Cholesterol Specificity in Binding (A) Crystal-packing environment of the previously published (Cherezov et al., 2007; Rosenbaum et al., 2007) carβ2AR-T4L (PDB ID: 2RH1) where the receptor monomers pack in a parallel orientation. Three cholesterol molecules are bound to each monomer and a palmitic acid alkyl chain from the crystallographically related monomer that is located between cholesterol 2 and 3. The four lipid molecules form an eight-membered lipid sheet when the crystallographically related monomer is generated (top and bottom figures). (B) Crystal-packing environment of timβ2AR(E122W)-T4L structure where the receptor monomers pack in an antiparallel orientation. Cholesterol 1 and 2 are retained in the new crystal form and are not implicated in packing interactions (top and bottom figures). (C) Experimental electron density for the cholesterol molecules is shown in stereo. The Fo−Fc maps contoured at 2σ were calculated after omitting the cholesterol contribution to the overall phases and randomly shaking the model to reduce phase bias. (D) Comparison of cholesterol binding between timβ2AR(E122W)-T4L (yellow) and carβ2AR-T4L (cyan). Cholesterol 2 binds in approximately the same orientation between the two structures. Cholesterol 1 is modeled differently in the current structure with a 90° rotation and a 1.9 Å translation about the long axis of the molecule. These modifications were necessary to optimally fit the experimental electron density. Structure 2008 16, 897-905DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.001) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Analysis of Helical Packing and Thermal Stability Increase Due to Cholesterol Binding (A) The receptor is colored by normalized occluded surface area. Red thick lines indicate the compact areas of the receptor and blue thin lines are the least compact. Helix IV has the lowest packing of the seven helices in the tertiary structure, particularly on the cytoplasmic end. Cholesterol binding stabilizes the receptor by increasing packing constraints, especially in the vicinity of the cytoplasmic end of helix IV. The values range from 10% to 70% of the total available surface area being involved in packing interactions. (B) Differences in the normalized occluded surface area of the receptor due to cholesterol binding. Values range from 0% to 15% increase in packing of available surface area due to cholesterol binding, with the most significant increases seen for residues on helices II and IV. (C) Molecular surface representation of the receptor and cholesterol. The green-colored surface corresponds to atoms on both cholesterol and the receptor that are within 4 Å of each other. The blue-colored surface corresponds to atoms on the receptor that are 4 and 5 Å from the cholesterol molecules. In the second panel, the cholesterol molecules have been lifted out of the binding groove to better show the interactions and the binding groove. (D) Isothermal CPM determination of the half-life of denaturation in the presence of 1 M GnHCl with and without both CHS and timolol. The thickness of the line represents the 95% confidence interval over three replicates, and the fitted half lives are indicated next to the respective curves. Both timolol and cholesterol cause an approximate 5-fold increase in half-life under these conditions. In combination, the effect is almost 16-fold relative to apo. Structure 2008 16, 897-905DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.001) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structurally Determined Receptor Cholesterol Consensus Motif and the Effects of Cholesterol Association on Ligand-Binding Properties of β2AR (A) The sites of importance in the receptor cholesterol consensus motif are displayed with the β2AR side-chain positions. Site 1 (blue) at the cytoplasmic base of helix IV spanning positions 4.39-4.43 fulfills the CCM requirement if one or more of these positions contains an arginine or lysine residue. Site 2 (cyan) at position 4.50 on helix IV contributes CH-π hydrogen-bonding interactions (represented as space-filling atoms) and is the most conserved site with tryptophan occupying the position in 94% of class A receptors. Site 3 (green) at position 4.46 on helix IV contributes van der Waals interactions (represented as space-filling atoms) to cholesterol binding and fulfills the CCM requirement if isoleucine, valine, or leucine occupy the position. Site 4 (orange) on helix II at position 2.41 can be either phenylalanine or tyrosine to define the strict-CCM requirement. (B) Competition binding curves for β2AR(E122W)-T4L in the presence and absence of cholesterol. Cholesterol in complex with β-methyl cyclodextran was added to the expression cultures 24 hr after expression. A 2-fold reduction in the Ki for timolol is observed due to cholesterol addition, but not for isoproterenol. Structure 2008 16, 897-905DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.001) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Venn Diagram Illustrating the Abundance of Specific Elements of the CCM Among Human Class A GPCRs The individual circles are proportional to the percentage of receptors possessing each element. Twenty-one percent of human class A receptors contain the entire four-component strict-CCM. If the requirement for an aromatic at position 2.41 is removed, 44% of human class A receptors would contain the less restrictive CCM motif. The removal of this position from the strict-CCM is justified by the relatively long van der Waals interactions between cholesterol and Tyr702.41 in β2AR. Structure 2008 16, 897-905DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.001) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions