Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus DgkB Structure Reveals a Common Catalytic Mechanism for the Soluble Diacylglycerol Kinases  Darcie J. Miller, Agoston.
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Ubiquitin Recognition by the Human TSG101 Protein
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Katsuhiko Kamada, Fumio Hanaoka  Molecular Cell 
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
E.Radzio Andzelm, J Lew, S Taylor  Structure 
Active and Inactive Protein Kinases: Structural Basis for Regulation
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Structure and Activation Mechanism of the CHK2 DNA Damage Checkpoint Kinase  Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell  Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 818-829 (September 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.007 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of the CHK2K249R Dimer (A) Linear representation of CHK2 depicting the SCD, FHA, and kinase domain (KD) boundaries and the two truncated CHK2K249R of the P1 and P212121 crystal forms. (B) Schematic representation of the CHK2K249R dimer in the P212121 crystal form with the two protomers colored in red and blue. The FHA domains and the N and C lobes of the bilobal kinase domain are labeled. The secondary structure elements of one protomer are labeled by numbers for β strands and letters for α helices, with the FHA labels followed by the symbol (′) (Figure S1). The yellow spheres indicate the approximate positions of the phosphoThr phosphate group based on the structure of the isolated FHA-phosphopeptide complex (Li et al., 2002). Dotted lines indicate disordered regions, including the activation loops. (C) View of the CHK2K249R dimer looking down the vertical axis of (A). Molecular Cell 2009 35, 818-829DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The CHK2K249R Dimer Forms through Intermolecular FHA-KD, FHA-FHA, and FHA-Linker Interfaces (A) Close-up view of the intermolecular interface between the FHA (red) and kinase (blue) domains of the two protomers. The interacting amino acids of the FHA are shown in pink, and those of the kinase N lobe are shown in blue. Green dotted lines indicate groups within hydrogen bonding distance, and asterisks indicate residues mutated in cancer. For clarity, only a subset of the secondary structure elements is labeled. (B) Close-up view of a portion of the dimer interface that involves FHA-FHA and FHA-linker intermolecular contacts, colored as in (A). Molecular Cell 2009 35, 818-829DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Dimeric CHK2 Structure Is Consistent with the SCD-FHA Association Being Intermolecular Molecular surface representation of the CHK2 dimer showing the position of a high-affinity peptide cocrystallized with the isolated FHA domain of CHK2 (Li et al., 2002). The peptides, one for each FHA domain, are positioned by superimposing the FHA domains. Assuming the peptide's phosphoThr is equivalent to Thr68 and the same direction of the polypeptide chain, the peptide would correspond to residues Thr65–Tyr72 of the SCD. Dotted lines highlight the 34 Å line of sight between the C terminus of the peptide and the N terminus of the FHA domain. Orientation as in Figure 1C. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 818-829DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 SCD-Independent CHK2K249R Dimerization in Solution (A) Size-exclusion chromatography of CHK2K249R (residues 70–512) at increasing concentrations (blue profile at 120 μM; red, 220 μM; black, 480 μM; green, 710 μM). The retention volumes of proteins used as molecular weight standards are indicated on top. (B) Quantitation of the size-exclusion chromatography profiles of (A), showing that the fraction of the protein that elutes in the dimer peak increases with increasing protein concentration. Quantitation is approximate due to the partial overlap of the two peaks at the higher protein concentrations. (C) Native gel analysis of CHK2K249R (residues 70–512) at the indicated concentrations, showing the appearance of a faster-migrating second band starting at a protein concentration of 50 μM. (D) Size-exclusion chromatography profiles of SCD-containing CHK2K249R (residues 40–512), showing that the phospho-mimetic T68E mutation (green profile) enhances dimerization of CHK2K249R, whereas the I157T (red) and W97A (purple) mutations at the FHA-KD and FHA-FHA interfaces, respectively, reduce dimerization. All proteins were at 300 μM. (E) Dimer fraction of the proteins shown in (D), calculated based on size-exclusion chromatography analyses at multiple protein concentrations for each protein. The dimer fractions of the elution profiles in (D) are indicated by an asterisk (∗). Molecular Cell 2009 35, 818-829DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 CHK2 Kinase Conformation (A) The activation loop of the P212121 form (red) adopts the inactive conformation characterized by the formation of the αT1 helix and disorder (dotted line) of the subsequent 12 residues. In the P1 crystal form (green), part of the activation loop adopts a conformation similar to the active state, which, as seen in the structure of the active PKA (gray) (Zheng et al., 1993), is characterized by the formation of the β9 strand instead of the αT1 helix. The autophosphorylation sites of CHK2 (Thr378) and PKA (phosphoThr197) are also shown. Residue numbers of the CHK2 secondary structure elements are labeled. (B) The quaternary structure of the CHK2 dimer (red and blue) differs from the previously reported crystallographic symmetry-related dimer of the isolated CHK2 kinase domain (magenta and yellow) (Oliver et al., 2006). The two dimers were superimposed by aligning one kinase domain in each dimer. The Asp347 catalytic residue of each kinase domain is shown in black, and the intradimer distances between the Asp347 side chains in each of the two dimers are indicated by black dotted lines. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 818-829DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Dissociation of the CHK2 Dimer after Activation (A) Size-exclusion chromatography profiles of active CHK2 either lacking the SCD (residues 70–512, 470 μM, red) or containing the SCD (residues 40–502, 310 μM, blue) exhibit singe peaks coincident with the monomer peaks of the corresponding kinase-dead CHK2K249R proteins (thinner magenta and cyan lines, respectively). (B) Model of a hypothetical, active CHK2 dimer (yellow and green) superimposed on the inactive dimer structure (red and blue) by aligning the N lobes. The αB, αEF, and αG secondary structure elements that could result in intermolecular steric clashes when the kinase is activated are labeled. (C) Comparison of the kinase C lobe positions in the inactive structure (red and blue) and in the model of the active dimer (yellow and green), looking up the vertical direction in (B). The disordered segment (residues 393–404) between the αEF and αF is indicated by a dotted line. For clarity, the disordered activation loop between the start of αEF (residue 388) and the end of β8 is not indicated. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 818-829DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions