Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
Advertisements

Role of Hydration Water in Protein Unfolding
Thomas G. Anderson, Harden M. McConnell  Biophysical Journal 
Hydration Force in the Atomic Force Microscope: A Computational Study
Thermodynamics of Forming a Parallel DNA Crossover
Predicting Ion Binding Properties for RNA Tertiary Structures
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 103, Issue 9, Pages (November 2012)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Perfect Sampling of the Master Equation for Gene Regulatory Networks
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 96, Issue 11, Pages (June 2009)
Looping Probabilities in Model Interphase Chromosomes
The Origin of Short Transcriptional Pauses
The Transfer Functions of Cardiac Tissue during Stochastic Pacing
Equation of State for Phospholipid Self-Assembly
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Phase Transitions in Biological Systems with Many Components
Nicolas Destainville, Manoel Manghi, John Palmeri  Biophysical Journal 
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Christa Trandum, Peter Westh, Kent Jørgensen, Ole G. Mouritsen 
Near-Critical Fluctuations and Cytoskeleton-Assisted Phase Separation Lead to Subdiffusion in Cell Membranes  Jens Ehrig, Eugene P. Petrov, Petra Schwille 
Serapion Pyrpassopoulos, Henry Shuman, E. Michael Ostap 
Folding of the Protein Domain hbSBD
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Static Light Scattering From Concentrated Protein Solutions II: Experimental Test of Theory for Protein Mixtures and Weakly Self-Associating Proteins 
Raft Formation in Lipid Bilayers Coupled to Curvature
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Kinetic and Energetic Analysis of Thermally Activated TRPV1 Channels
Taeyoon Kim, Margaret L. Gardel, Ed Munro  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Colocalization of Multiple DNA Loci: A Physical Mechanism
FRET or No FRET: A Quantitative Comparison
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Confinement-Dependent Friction in Peptide Bundles
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 96, Issue 11, Pages (June 2009)
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Tests of Continuum Theories as Models of Ion Channels. I
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
B-S Transition in Short Oligonucleotides
Thermodynamic Characterization of the Unfolding of the Prion Protein
The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical.
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
An Effective Solvent Theory Connecting the Underlying Mechanisms of Osmolytes and Denaturants for Protein Stability  Apichart Linhananta, Shirin Hadizadeh,
Congju Chen, Irina M. Russu  Biophysical Journal 
Translational Entropy and DNA Duplex Stability
A Mesoscale Model of DNA and Its Renaturation
Effects of Receptor Interaction in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Dustin B. McIntosh, Gina Duggan, Quentin Gouil, Omar A. Saleh 
The Role of Stretching in Slow Axonal Transport
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Vesna Serrano, Wenge Liu, Stefan Franzen  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
Membrane Perturbation Induced by Interfacially Adsorbed Peptides
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Partition and Permeation of Dextran in Polyacrylamide Gel
Dynamic Role of Cross-Linking Proteins in Actin Rheology
Presentation transcript:

Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages 578-587 (July 2010) A Three-State Model with Loop Entropy for the Overstretching Transition of DNA  Thomas R. Einert, Douglas B. Staple, Hans-Jürgen Kreuzer, Roland R. Netz  Biophysical Journal  Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages 578-587 (July 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.046 Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Comparison of force extension curves obtained by different methods for c = 0. The curve obtained via the exact transfer matrix calculation Eq. 20 is already for N = 2 accurately reproduced by the approximate Legendre transformation Eq. 13. The dominating singularity method equation, i.e., Eq. 16 (or, equivalently, Eq. 21), is strictly valid in the thermodynamic limit but agrees with the Legendre transform already for a modest value of N = 10. The units of the abscissa is in extension per basepair. Parameters for λ-DNA in the absence of DDP are used (see Section E in the Supporting Material). Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 578-587DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.046) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 (Bottom panel) Force extension curve of double-stranded λ-DNA with and without DDP. (Symbols) Experimental data (20); (lines) fits with the three-state model for c = 0. The main difference between the two curves is the lack of cooperativity in the BS-transition in the presence of DDP which we take into account by choosing vanishing interaction energies Vij = 0, i, j = B, S, M. (Top panel) Fraction Ni/N of segments in the different states, as follows from Eq. 24 in the absence of DDP. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 578-587DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.046) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Various force-extension curves of the three-state model with fit parameters for λ-DNA without DDP. (a) (Lower panel) Force extension curves for different values of the loop exponent c, showing no phase transition (c ≤ 1), a continuous (1 <c ≤ 2), or a first-order phase transition (c > 2). (Open circles) Critical forces. (Inset) Magnification of the region around the transition. (Upper panel) Fraction of bases in the three states for c = 3/2. The critical transition, above which all bases are in the molten M-state, is discerned as a kink in the curves. (b) Comparison of experimental data (circles) and theory for c ≠ 0. The curve for c = 0 and VSM = 0, already shown in Fig. 2, is obtained by fitting lS, g0s, and g0M to the experimental data, the values of which are kept fixed for all curves shown. The curve for VSM = 0 and c = 0.6 results by fitting c and slightly improves the fit quality. The curve c = 0 and VSM = 1.1 × 10−21 J is obtained by fitting VSM. The curve for VSM = 1.1 × 10−21 J and c = 0.3 is obtained by fitting c and keeping VSM fixed. (Inset) First derivative of x(F), illustrating that increasing c leads to a growing asymmetry around the transition region. (c) Temperature dependence of the force extension curves. Increasing temperature leads to a decrease of the BS-plateau force. In the presence of a true denaturing transition, i.e., for c > 1, the critical force Fc decreases with increasing temperature, and for F >Fc, the force extension curve follows a pure WLC behavior. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 578-587DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.046) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 (Solid line) Critical force Fc for c = 3/2, at which a singularity occurs according to Eq. 28. Phase boundaries for c = 0 (thick lines) and c = 3/2 (thin lines) are defined by NM/N = 0.5 (dotted) and NB/N = 0.5 (dashed). (Dot) The melting temperature Tc. (Insets) Behavior of the phase boundaries near the melting temperature, F∝Tc−T. Parameters for λ-DNA without DDP are used. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 578-587DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.046) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Relative fraction of segments in the B-state, NB/N, as a function of temperature for different loop exponents c = 0, 1.5, and 2.1 and for finite BS interfacial energy VBS =VBM = 1.2 × 10−20 J (bold lines) and for VBS =VBM = 0 (thin lines). (Circles) Positions of the phase transition. For all curves, parameters for λ-DNA without DDP have been used, g0M (T) = 1.5 × 10−19 J –T × 4.2 × 10−22 J/K for c = 0, and g0M (T) = 1.6 × 10−19 J –T × 4.6 × 10−22 J/K for c > 0. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 578-587DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.046) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions