Studies on orbit corrections

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Advertisements

Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac revised K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV,
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design Alexander Valishev, for the FNAL LET group FNAL AP Dept. Meeting March 7, 2007.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
ERHIC Orbit Correction Studies (Minor Update) Using Oct’14 lattice and dispersion diagnostic January 5, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
1 & 2 JUNE 2015 – LLRF – BEAM DYNAMICS WORKSHOP URIOT Didier What is taken into account in simulations LLRF – Beam dynamics Workshop.
Slide 1 of 28 Matthew Fraser – HIE-ISOLDE Review Meeting, 15 th June 2009.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
4/10/2004SPARC Review Committee Orbit Correction S. Guiducci On behalf of the Beam Dynamics Group.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Overview of the RISP SCL
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Alignment and beam-based correction
Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac
General Design of C-ADS Accelerator Physics
Feng Zhou LCLS-II AP meeting 02/23/2017
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Physics design on the main linac
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
DFS Simulations on ILC bunch compressor
BUNCH LENGTH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR 500 KV PHOTOCATHODE DC GUN AT IHEP
Beam dynamics of RAON accelerator system
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
LCLS-II physics meeting 3/25/2015
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
SC ISOL Linac of KoRIA Tae-Sun Park (SKKU).
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
CEPC injector beam dynamics
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
CEPC Injector Linac beam dynamics
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Injector for the Electron Cooler
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
First Look at Error Sensitivity in MEIC
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Main Linac Beam Optics and Tolerances
Presentation transcript:

Studies on orbit corrections error analysis Cai Meng Institute of High Energy Physics Joint IHEP-IMP group on C-ADS accelerator physics

Main topics Alignment errors and rf errors The correction scheme of Injector-I The correction scheme of middle β spoke cavity section Summary

Alignment errors and RF dynamics errors The maximum cold misalignment of elements is 1 mm, which is larger than warm misalignment 0.4 mm. The maximum rotation angle is 2 mrad. For the dynamic errors, the field amplitude error is 0.5% and the field phase error is 0.5 degree (reference to SNS). Simulation code is TraceWin. In the correction scheme, the BPMs uncertainty are 100 micron (um). These errors are reasonable ? Error Tolerance Distribution cold element displacement ±1 mm Uniform warm element displacement ±0.4 mm element rotation ±2 mrad BPM uncertainty 0.1 mm RF amplitude fluctuation ±0.5% Gaussian RF phase fluctuation ±0.5º

Preliminary correction scheme of Injector-I The phase advance per period of Injector-I is about 40~90 degree, so there are a pair of correctors and BPMs in one period. Considering the structure of Injector-I, the correctors are attached to solenoid and BPMs are installed in the drift between Spoke cavity and solenoid.

Spoke012 section with anti-symmetric lattice Spoke012 section with anti-symmetric lattice in two cryomodule. Different percent error means that percent of the maximum error. For example, 60% error is 0.6 mm element displacement and 1.2 mrad rotation angle, the rf dynamic error is unchanged. Centroid orbit distribution of 100 linacs with different percent error.

Spoke012 section with the anti-symmetric lattice Control the centroid orbit well Under 0.35 mm(RMS), that means the maximum centroid displacement is about 0.7mm.

Spoke012 section with the anti-symmetric lattice before correction after correction Average emittance (normalized rms emittance ) growth percent with different percent statistics errors (100 linacs) at the lattice end After correction scheme, the transverse emittance growth is under 14 % and longitudinal emittance is under 10% After correction scheme, there is no beam loss.

Spoke012 section with the anti-symmetric lattice  

Spoke012 section with one cryomodule scheme Correction scheme RMS centroid orbit 0.4 mm, the maximum centroid orbit is about 0.8 mm

Spoke012 section with one cryomodule scheme before correction after correction Average emittance (normalized rms emittance ) growth percent with different percent statistics errors (100 linacs) at the lattice end After correction scheme, the transverse emittance growth is under 3 % and longitudinal emittance is under 8%

Spoke012 section with one cryomodule scheme  

Spoke011T section with one cryomodule scheme Maximum centroid orbit is about 0.8 mm

Spoke011T section with one cryomodule scheme After correction scheme, the transverse emittance growth is under 5.7 % and longitudinal emittance is under 8.7%

Spoke011T section with one cryomodule scheme  

Comparative correction results of Injectors Maximum rms centroid orbit after correction is controlled under 0.4 mm The maximum centroid displacement is smaller than 0.8 mm with the maximum errors. Maximum rms centroid orbit(horizontal/vertical) (mm) correction Spoke012 two CM one CM Spoke011T 20% error without 1/0.98 0.76/0.7 0.65/0.62 with 0.14/0.14 0.12/0.11 0.11/0.11 40% error 1.78/1.92 1.34/1.45 1.37/1.27 0.2/0.21 0.18/0.17 0.17/0.18 60% error 2.52/3.15 2.12/2.3 1.7/2.26 0.24/0.22 0.24/0.25 0.23/0.24 80% error 4.34/3.94 2.81/2.92 2.72/2.41 0.33/0.31 0.32/0.33 100% error 5.1/4.3 3.34/3.5 3.64/3.22 0.35/0.38 0.42/0.42 0.42/0.38

Comparative correction results of Injectors Average emittance growth percent Two CM scheme has larger emittance growth, especially transverse. Average emittance growth percent (x / y / z) (%) correction Spoke012 two CM one CM Spoke011T 20% error without 11.9/11.8/5.95 1.78/1.84/5.47 4.1/4/ 4.92 with 11.3/11.1/5.04 1.38/1.72/ /4.3 4.03/3.84/4.83 40% error 14.1/ 13.8/ 9.6 2.9/3.03/9.11 4.3/4.6/6.2 11.6/11.5/5.65 1.74/1.76/4.69 4.14/4.1/5.2 60% error 16.8/16.9/15.7 4.19/4.57/13.7 4.8/4.7/8.2 12/12/6.46 1.86/2.13/5.56 4.6/4.4/6.1 80% error 24.3/24.2/29.5 5.92/6.89/19.3 5.8/ 5.7/11.3 12.7/12.7/8.1 2.24/ 2.5/6.25 5/4.8/7.1 100% error 31.4/32.2/41.4 8.08/10.2/27.5 6.8/ 6.9/15.8 13.8/13.8/9.8 2.78/3.08/7.83 5.6/5.4/8.7

Preliminary correction scheme of middle β spoke section Spoke021 section with two cavities and one solenoid one period Spoke040 section with four cavities and one solenoid one period A pair of correctors and a BPM in one period Spoke040 section: BPM maybe put in the drift between CMs

Preliminary correction scheme of middle β spoke section Maximum centroid orbit is about 0.5mm

Preliminary correction scheme of middle β spoke section After correction scheme, the transverse emittance growth is under 2 % and longitudinal emittance is under 11% After correction, there is no beam loss.

Preliminary correction scheme of middle β spoke section  

Summary According to the phase advance of lattice, a pair of correctors and a BPM are put in one period for solenoid section. The correctors are attached to solenoid. According to the results of centroid obit and emittance growth, the performance of one cryomodule scheme is better than two cryomodule scheme. The correction scheme can control the centroid obit in 0.8 mm even with 1 mm misalignment of elements, meanwhile it can depress the emittance growth greatly.

Further work Repeat the simulation with Track code to compare the results with TraceWin Reduce the number of BPMs to study the correction scheme Simulate detailed and overall error analysis and so on…

Thanks for your attention !