Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Advertisements

Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages (May 1998)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
The C. elegans SYS-1 Protein Is a Bona Fide β-Catenin
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Core Structure of gp41 from the HIV Envelope Glycoprotein
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
ICAT Inhibits β-Catenin Binding to Tcf/Lef-Family Transcription Factors and the General Coactivator p300 Using Independent Structural Modules  Danette.
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of the InlB Leucine-Rich Repeats, a Domain that Triggers Host Cell Invasion by the Bacterial Pathogen L. monocytogenes  Michael Marino, Laurence.
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Presentation transcript:

Three-Dimensional Structure of the Armadillo Repeat Region of β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell  Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages 871-882 (September 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80352-9

Figure 1 Limited Proteolysis of β-Catenin (A) SDS–PAGE gel showing digestion of β-catenin with increasing concentrations of trypsin. Positions of molecular weight markers (kDa) are shown on the left, and the positions of tryptic fragments with apparent molecular weights of 40 and 10 kDa are marked with arrows on the right. Increasing trypsin concentration is denoted by the wedge above the gel. Digest mixtures contained 2.0 mg/ml β-catenin in 90 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.5), 2 mM CaCl2, and 4 mM DTT with 0 μg/ml (lane 1), 0.02 μg/ml (lane 2), 0.08 μg/ml (lane 3), 0.33 μg/ml (lane 4), 1.33 μg/ml (lane 5), 5.33 μg/ml (lane 6), or 21.33 μg/ml trypsin (lane 7). Digests were incubated at 24°C for 20 minutes and stopped with TLCK. (B) Schematic of β-catenin primary structure showing the location of the cleavage sites that produce the stable products shown in (A). The 12 armadillo repeats of β-catenin are represented with numbered boxes. Numbered arrows indicate the residues NH2-terminal to the trypsin cleavage sites. Cell 1997 90, 871-882DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80352-9)

Figure 2 Stereo Views of Electron Density Maps The region near Trp-338, which interacts with Arg residues in the groove of β59, is shown. The upper panel shows a portion of the refined Form A model in the experimental 2.4 Å MAD-phased map. The lower panel shows the same region of the Form B model in the final 2.9 Å Form B 2Fo − Fc map. Both maps are contoured at 1.0 σ. Cell 1997 90, 871-882DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80352-9)

Figure 3 β59 Structure (A) Stereo Cα trace of the Form B structure. Spheres denote every tenth α-carbon, and every twentieth residue is labeled. (B) Topology (upper) and ribbon (lower) diagrams of β59. Circles and rectangles represent helices viewed end on and from the side, respectively. The arrows indicate the NH2- to COOH-terminal direction of the polypeptide. Arrows terminate at the circle perimeter when connected to the end of the helix farthest from the viewer and enter the circle when connected to the end of the helix nearest the viewer. Helices 1, 2, and 3 are colored blue, red, and green, respectively. (C) Comparison of bundle topology found in β-catenin with those of two representative four-helix bundle proteins, as discussed in Raag et al. 1988. The symbols are the same as in (B). The COOH-terminal end of each helix is shaded. The Cα trace and the ribbon diagram were made with MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis 1991). Cell 1997 90, 871-882DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80352-9)

Figure 4 Sequence and Structural Similarities among Repeats (A) Structure-based sequence alignment of the 12 armadillo repeats of murine β-catenin. Italicized residues are not visible in either crystal form. The repeat numbers and the corresponding ranges of amino acids are shown on the left. The portions of the sequence that form helices H1, H2, and H3 are boxed. Structural positions with strong preferences for a given amino acid or group of amino acids are shaded and listed on the line marked “Consensus” with the following symbols: half-closed box = general hydrophobic (residues in 10 of 12 repeats = A, C, F, I, L, M, P, T, V, or W); open box = small hydrophobic (general hydrophobic with 8 of 12 = A, C, P, V, or T); closed box = large hydrophobic (general hydrophobic with 8 of 12 = F, I, L, M, or W); (+) = basic (8 of 12 = H, K, or R). Consensus positions are assigned specific residue identities if 8 of 12 repeats have the same amino acid, or if two amino acids are present in at least four repeats each. (B) Stereo view of repeats 5 and 6, showing conserved hydrophobic packing interactions. A Cα trace is shown for residues 307–390. The backbone, and side chains of amino acids in the consensus positions shown in (A), are displayed with blue, red, or green bonds, corresponding to H1, H2, and H3, respectively. The two basic consensus positions ([+] in [A]) have been omitted for clarity. White, blue, red, and yellow spheres represent carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur atoms. Amino acids are labeled with single-letter code followed by the residue number. The role of conserved hydrophobic residues in H1 is illustrated by A356, which is near the surface but packs laterally against P321 and other residues from the previous repeat, and I357, which packs against hydrophobic residues of H2 and H3 from both repeats. Note that the exposed hydrophobic residues seen in the figure are actually packed against hydrophobic residues of neighboring repeats. This stereo model was made with MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis 1991). Cell 1997 90, 871-882DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80352-9)

Figure 5 Stereo View Showing Relative Motion of the Two Halves of β59 The Cαs from residues 193–390 from Form A (gray) and Form B (black) have been superimposed. The COOH-terminal portions of the two structures are related by an 11.5° rotation about the axis shown as a straight vertical line. The asterisk marks the middle of the loop that replaces H1 in repeat 7. This figure was made with MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis 1991). Cell 1997 90, 871-882DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80352-9)

Figure 6 Electrostatic Surface Representation of β59 Blue represents regions of positive potential and red regions of negative potential, at the 10 kT/e level. The three views are related by successive 90° rotations about the vertical axis. The NH2-terminal end of the molecule is at the bottom of the figure. This figure was made with GRASP (Nicholls 1992). Cell 1997 90, 871-882DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80352-9)