Www.hoarelea.com Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment NOISE CONDITIONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Advertisements

Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment PLANNING POLICY & ETSU-R-97.
Preparing for Confirmation of Candidature
Running a model's adjoint to obtain derivatives, while more efficient and accurate than other methods, such as the finite difference method, is a computationally.
John Pointing, Barrister Legal Partner, Statutory Nuisance Solutions 1.
1 Budgets and Budgetary Control Prepared and Presented By Gladstone K. Hlalakuhle.
Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment NOISE PREDICTIONS – SOURCE DATA AND PROPAGATION.
Department of Arts and Culture Briefing on the Use of Official Languages Bill to the Select Committee on Education and Recreation Date:15 August 2012.
ACOUSTICS 9 MW. ACOUSTICS 144 MW.
Maine Center for Disease Control & Prevention Radiation Control Program, Radon Section Radon Section Leader Maine DHHS, Radiation Control Program
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
A VISUAL AID TO PYROMETRY COMPLIANCE (A Guide To An Acceptable TUS Report) February 2010.
1 Licensing in the Energy Sector Georgian National Energy And Water Supply Regulation Commission Nugzar Beridze June 27 – July 3, 2008.
Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment
Assessment. Schedule graph may be of help for selecting the best solution Best solution corresponds to a plateau before a high jump Solutions with very.
An Act of Parliament to provide for compensation to employees for work related injuries and diseases contracted in the course of their employment and for.
Determination of System Equivalency – TaskForce Audi, EA-52, V4.0 WLTP-10-33e.
New Template of Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility Environmental Approvals Branch Presented to Air Practitioners’ Group.
1 Seventh Lecture Error Analysis Instrumentation and Product Testing.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
CoastdownVH&C Onboard Anemometry Ford Motor Company North America WLTP-11-14e.
Proposed Code of Practice for Inspections 3 rd Edition David Capon JAG UK Manager Keith O’Brien Cable & Wireless Worldwide.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Determination of System Equivalency – Starting note for WLTP IWG Meeting #8 in Pune, India Audi, EA-52, V2.0 WLTP-08-09e.
Inference for regression - Simple linear regression
Business Communication: Process and Product, 6e Mary Ellen Guffey Copyright © 2008 Chapter 12 Informal Business Reports.
Determining Sample Size
S10 CONS5Q25 Lara Tookey. Review of estimators workings Decision on what margin to apply Bid submission details Submit your Tender.
1 Institute of Engineering Mechanics Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck, Austria, EU H.J. Pradlwarter and G.I. Schuëller Confidence.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 10 Management of data sets and improving the precision of measurement pt. 2.
Problems related to the use of the existing noise measurement standards when predicting noise from wind turbines and wind farms. Erik Sloth Vestas Niels.
The Examination of Residuals. Examination of Residuals The fitting of models to data is done using an iterative approach. The first step is to fit a simple.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental Affairs National Environmental Management Laws Amendment Bill.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
The new VicSmart process and provisions. What is VicSmart? VicSmart is a fast planning permit process A decision is expected to be made in 10 days All.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
Biology 11 – Mr. Penton LAB WRITING.
OHS Seminar DO THE TIME – avoid the crime! Miles Crawley 8 June 2007.
1 UNC Modification 429 Customer Settlement Error Claims Process – Guidance Document.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Title V, Preliminary Completeness Review. What do I need to do?  I need to find out if the application contains the required information.  Initial Title.
Minimum Wages Act 1948.
REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED LAND IN SOUTH AFRICA Part 8 of the Waste Act Ms Mishelle Govender Chemicals and Waste Management.
USE OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN TESTING ROHAN PERERA MSc ( UK ), ISO/IEC Technical Assessor, Metrology Consultant.
Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment BASELINE NOISE MEASUREMENTS.
CABLING SYSTEM WARRANTY REGISTRATION. PURPOSE OF CABLING REGISTRATION.
John Batty DEFRA UK Bratislava November Legal Background For any given surface water body, applying the MAC-EQS means that the measured concentration.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Informations and comments on ECE-TRANS-WP.29-GRB e 1 Louis-Ferdinand PARDO (France) Transmitted by the expert from France Informal document GRB
Unit 4 Assignment 3 Practical techniques. Task 1 (P4) You will need to complete the following experiments. You will need to hand in a portfolio of your.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Unit IV Ultrasonic examination of welds Foreword.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies 2010 Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit Chapter Six.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
Police Governance – Providing Value to Your Community Board Training - May 27, 2015 Fred Kaustinen OAPSB.
Writing Scientific Research Paper
Postgraduate Examination Board Briefing
Examination Board Briefing
General Data Protection Regulation
General Data Protection Regulations 2018
Mod CMC_03_18 Unique circumstances may arise whereby the Transmission System Operator or Distribution System Operator requires additional time to formulate.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Ag.no.17 A65 Method Manual: Reference period for remuneration data
Presentation transcript:

Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment NOISE CONDITIONS

Conditions Wind farms that receive consent have in some cases been challenged on the basis of the attached noise conditions The claim is made that the conditions fail one or more of the tests of valid conditions, namely that they must be: Necessary Relevant to planning Relevant to the development to be permitted Enforceable Precise Reasonable in all other respects

Noise condition: simple example? Which background? ES/new measurements? Measured where? All wind speeds? 15m/s? (wind speed reference?) When to investigate? In what timescales? L A90 ? L Aeq? Measured how? Reasonable to assume ETSU-R-97 method. Choice? Greater of… Noise from the wind farm shall not exceed a level of 35dB or 5 dB above background noise at all wind speeds. Where does it apply? Dwellings? Schools? A field?

The result of legal challenges Efforts are increasingly being made to tighten up the wording of conditions Is this attempt to increase precision reasonable or necessary? Walk through of an example more detailed conditions, is presented on the following slides As a minimum: reference to ETSU-R-97, clear limits, clear timescales, where/when/how See recent appeal decisions and get legal advice Cumulative limits need additional consideration

Sample IOA GPG Noise Condition The rating level of noise immissions from the combined effects of the wind turbines (including the application of any tonal penalty) when determined in accordance with the attached Guidance Notes (to this condition), shall not exceed the values for the relevant integer wind speed set out in, or derived from, the tables attached to these conditions at any dwelling which is lawfully existing or has planning permission at the date of this permission and:

TABLES OF NOISE LIMITS RELATING TO CONDITION 1 Table 1: Between 23:00 and 07:00 hours (Maximum Noise Level L A90, 10min dB): Property Standardised wind speed at 10m height, ms Property 1 X XXXXXXXXXXX Property 2 XXXXXXXXXXXX Property 3 XXXXXXXXXXXX All other properties XXXXXXXXXXXX Table 2: At all other times (Maximum Noise Level L A90, 10min dB): Add table listing property coordinates? Property Standardised wind speed at 10m height, ms Property 1 X XXXXXXXXXXX Property 2 XXXXXXXXXXXX Property 3 XXXXXXXXXXXX All other properties XXXXXXXXXXXX N.B. Noise level not to be exceeded: does not prescribe how to achieve it.

Sample IOA GPG Noise Condition c.) Within 21 days from receipt of a written request from the Local Planning Authority following a complaint to it from an occupant of a dwelling alleging noise disturbance at that dwelling, the wind farm operator shall, at its expense, employ a consultant approved by the Local Planning Authority to assess the level of noise immissions from the wind farm at the complainants property in accordance with the procedures described in the attached Guidance Notes. The written request from the Local Planning Authority shall set out at least the date, time and location that the complaint relates to and any identified atmospheric conditions, including wind direction, and include a statement as to whether, in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the noise giving rise to the complaint contains or is likely to contain a tonal component.

d)The assessment of the rating level of noise immissions shall be undertaken in accordance with an assessment protocol that shall previously have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The protocol shall include the proposed measurement location identified in accordance with the Guidance Notes where measurements for compliance checking purposes shall be undertaken, whether noise giving rise to the complaint contains or is likely to contain a tonal component, and also the range of meteorological and operational conditions (which shall include the range of wind speeds, wind directions, power generation and times of day) to determine the assessment of rating level of noise immissions. The proposed range of conditions shall be those which prevailed during times when the complainant alleges there was disturbance due to noise, having regard to the written request of the Local Planning Authority under paragraph (c), and such others as the independent consultant considers likely to result in a breach of the noise limits. Sample IOA GPG Noise Condition

f)The wind farm operator shall provide to the Local Planning Authority the independent consultants assessment of the rating level of noise immissions undertaken in accordance with the Guidance Notes within 2 months of the date of the written request of the Local Planning Authority for compliance measurements to be made under paragraph (c), unless the time limit is extended in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The assessment shall include all data collected for the purposes of undertaking the compliance measurements, such data to be provided in the format set out in Guidance Note 1(e) of the Guidance Notes. The instrumentation used to undertake the measurements shall be calibrated in accordance with Guidance Note 1(a) and certificates of calibration shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority with the independent consultants assessment of the rating level of noise immissions. Sample Noise Conditions

Noise Guidance Notes These notes are to be read with and form part of the noise condition. They further explain the condition and specify the methods to be employed in the assessment of complaints about noise immissions from the wind farm.

NOTE 1: 1(a)Values of the L A90,10min noise statistic should be measured at the complainants property using a sound level meter of EN 60651/BS EN Type 1, or BS EN Class 1 quality (or the equivalent relevant UK adopted standard in force at the time of the measurements) set to measure using a fast time weighted response. This should be calibrated in accordance with the procedure specified in BS 4142: 1997 (or the equivalent relevant UK adopted standard in force at the time of the measurements). Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 1: 1(b)The microphone should be mounted at m above ground level, fitted with a two layer windshield (or suitable alternative approved in writing from the Local Planning Authority), and placed outside the complainants dwelling. Measurements should be made in free-field conditions. To achieve this, the microphone should be placed at least 3.5m away from the building facade or any reflecting surface except the ground. Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 1: 1(c)The L A90,10min measurements should be synchronised with measurements of the 10-minute arithmetic mean average wind speed, power generation, and with operational data from the turbine control systems of the wind farm or farms. Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 1: 1(d)To enable compliance with the conditions to be evaluated, the wind farm operator shall continuously log arithmetic mean wind speed in metres per second and wind direction in degrees from north at hub height for each turbine and arithmetic mean power generated by each turbine, all in successive 10-minute periods. Unless an alternative procedure is previously agreed in writing with the Planning Authority, this hub height wind speed, averaged across all operating wind turbines, shall be used as the basis for the analysis. All 10 minute arithmetic average mean wind speed data measured at hub height shall be standardised to a reference height of 10 metres as described in ETSU-R-97 at page 120 using a reference roughness length of 0.05 metres. It is this standardised 10 metre height wind speed data, which is correlated with the noise measurements determined as valid in accordance with Guidance Note 2, such correlation to be undertaken in the manner described in Guidance Note 2. All 10-minute periods shall commence on the hour and in 10- minute increments thereafter. Check wind reference is consistent with noise limits! Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 2: (a) The noise measurements shall be made so as to provide not less than 20 valid data points as defined in Guidance Note 2 (b) (b) Valid data points are those measured in the conditions specified in the agreed written protocol under paragraph (d) of the noise condition, but excluding any periods of rainfall measured in the vicinity of the sound level meter. Rainfall shall be assessed by use of a rain gauge that shall log the occurrence of rainfall in each 10 minute period concurrent with the measurement periods set out in Guidance Note 1. In specifying such conditions the Local Planning Authority shall have regard to those conditions which prevailed during times when the complainant alleges there was disturbance due to noise or which are considered likely to result in a breach of the limits. Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 3: Where, in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, noise immission at the location or locations where assessment measurements are being undertaken contain a tonal component, the following rating procedure should be used. Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 3: 3(a)For each 10-minute interval for which L A90,10min data have been obtained as provided for in Note 1, a tonal assessment is performed on noise immissions during 2-minutes of each 10- minute period. The 2-minute periods should be regularly spaced at 10-minute intervals provided that uninterrupted clean data are available. Where clean data are not available, the first available uninterrupted clean 2 minute period out of the affected overall 10 minute period shall be selected. Any such deviations from standard procedure shall be reported. Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 3: 3(b)For each of the 2-minute samples the margin above or below the audibility criterion of the tone level difference, D L tm (Delta L tm ) should be calculated by comparison with the audibility criterion given in Section 2.1 on pages of ETSU-R-97. 3(c)The margin above audibility is plotted against wind speed for each of the 2-minute samples. For samples for which the tones were below the audibility criterion or no tone was identified, substitute a value of zero audibility. Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 3: 3(d)A linear regression should then be performed to establish the margin above audibility at the assessed wind speed for each integer wind speed. If there is no apparent trend with wind speed then a simple arithmetic average shall be used. 3(e)The tonal penalty is derived from the margin above audibility of the tone according to the figure below. The rating levels at each wind speed is the arithmetic sum of the wind farm noise level, as determined from the best-fit curve described in Note 2, and the penalty for tonal noise. Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 3: Noise Guidance Notes

NOTE 4: If the rating level is above the limit set out in the conditions, measurements of the influence of background noise should be made to determine whether or not there is a breach of condition. This shall be achieved by repeating the steps in Note 2 with the wind farm switched off in order to determine the background noise, L 3, at the assessed wind speed. The wind farm noise at this wind speed, L 1, is then calculated as follows, where L 2 is the measured wind farm noise level at the assessed wind speed with turbines running but without the addition of any tonal penalty: The rating level is re-calculated by adding the tonal penalty (if any) to the wind farm noise. If the rating level lies at or below those set out in condition 1 then no further action is necessary. If the rating level exceeds those set out in condition 1, then the development fails to comply with condition 1. Noise Guidance Notes

Thank you