Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Advertisements

Mechanism of Cross-Species Prion Transmission
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
THZ1 Reveals Roles for Cdk7 in Co-transcriptional Capping and Pausing
Structural Basis of Interdomain Communication in the Hsc70 Chaperone
Sonja Schmid, Thorsten Hugel  Molecular Cell 
Dun1 Counts on Rad53 to Be Turned On
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Asymmetric Activation of the Hsp90 Dimer by Its Cochaperone Aha1
Now, More Than Ever, Proteomics Needs Better Chromatography
Thomas E. Edwards, Bruce H. Robinson, Snorri Th. Sigurdsson 
The Real-Time Path of Translation Factor IF3 onto and off the Ribosome
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Direct Activation of Gastric H,K-ATPase by N-Terminal Protein Kinase C Phosphorylation. Comparison of the Acute Regulation Mechanisms of H,K-ATPase and.
Kimberly Matulef, Galen E Flynn, William N Zagotta  Neuron 
Jerzy Majka, Anita Niedziela-Majka, Peter M.J. Burgers  Molecular Cell 
Complementary Structural Mass Spectrometry Techniques Reveal Local Dynamics in Functionally Important Regions of a Metastable Serpin  Xiaojing Zheng,
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Activation of the Bacterial Sensor Kinase PhoQ by Acidic pH
Kinetic Discrimination of tRNA Identity by the Conserved Motif 2 Loop of a Class II Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase  Ethan C. Guth, Christopher S. Francklyn 
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Myosin VI Undergoes Cargo-Mediated Dimerization
Parul Mishra, Daniel N.A. Bolon  Molecular Cell 
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Hybrid Structure of the RagA/C-Ragulator mTORC1 Activation Complex
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Yasunori Aizawa, Qing Xiang, Alan M. Lambowitz, Anna Marie Pyle 
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Asymmetric Activation of the Hsp90 Dimer by Its Cochaperone Aha1
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Shotgun Proteomics in Neuroscience
Sukhyun Kang, Megan D. Warner, Stephen P. Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
ATPase Site Architecture and Helicase Mechanism of an Archaeal MCM
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
HOTAIR Forms an Intricate and Modular Secondary Structure
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Helical peptide models for protein glycation: proximity effects in catalysis of the Amadori rearrangement  Janani Venkatraman, Kamna Aggarwal, P Balaram 
Scarlet S. Shell, Christopher D. Putnam, Richard D. Kolodner 
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 711-717 (March 2006) Autophosphorylation of FGFR1 Kinase Is Mediated by a Sequential and Precisely Ordered Reaction  Cristina M. Furdui, Erin D. Lew, Joseph Schlessinger, Karen S. Anderson  Molecular Cell  Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 711-717 (March 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.022 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Quantitative Analysis of FGFR1K Autophosphorylation (A) Experimental strategy for the quantification of different phosphorylated species and identification of phosphorylation sites. (B) A diagram of FGFR1K describing the position of the tyrosine autophosphorylation sites. Tryp1 to Tryp4 represent tryptic peptides from FGFR1K containing the tyrosine autophosphorylation sites. (C) Progression of FGFR1K autophosphorylation revealed by native PAGE analysis. FGFR1K (35 μM) was reacted with 5 mM ATP and 10 mM MgCl2 in a rapid chemical quench apparatus as described in the Experimental Procedures. The phosphorylation states at each time point were separated by native PAGE electrophoresis. (D) Table summarizing the observed phosphorylation states, the theoretical calculation of the combinatorial possibilities for each specific phosphorylation states, and the tyrosine sites undergoing autophosphorylation along with the respective tryptic peptides. The amino acid sequence of the peptides containing the potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites along with the relevant MS/MS fragment ions is summarized in Table S1. Molecular Cell 2006 21, 711-717DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.022) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Analysis of FGFR1K Autophosphorylation by Time-Resolved ESI-TOF MS (A) Instrumental setup for time-resolved ESI-TOF MS. (B) ESI-TOF MS spectra of the sample quenched at 300 s. ESI-TOF MS spectrum of unphosphorylated FGFR1K showing the full protein envelope (top). ESI-TOF MS spectrum of the unphosphorylated FGFR1K showing the charge states 11+, 12+, and 13+ (middle) and ESI-TOF MS spectrum of the phosphorylated FGFR1K (300 s reaction time) (bottom). Multiple phosphorylated species are present with a relative intensity similar to the native PAGE analysis (last lane, Figure 1C). (C) A selection of MS spectra collected by time-resolved ESI-TOF MS showing the formation of mono- and diphosphorylated FGFR1K species at increasing reaction times. 0P, 1P, and 2P represent the FGFR1K in unphosphorylated, mono-, and diphosphoryl states. (D) The relative intensities of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated species are plotted as function of time, and the reaction rates are determined for each phosphorylation event (0P → 1P, 0.14 min−1 and 1P → 2P, 0.013 min−1). 20+ and 13+ indicate data for two different charge states. Molecular Cell 2006 21, 711-717DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.022) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sequential and Ordered FGFR1K Autophosphorylation (A) KinTekSim analysis of FGFR1K autophosphorylation. The relative abundance of different phosphorylation states present at each time point were quantified by densitometric analysis and data plotted as function of time. KinTekSim analysis was performed to determine the formation and decay rate of each phosphorylated species according to the reaction mechanism presented in (B): FGFR1K-0P (black), FGFR1K-1P (red), FGFR1K-2P (green), FGFR1K-3P (yellow), FGFR1K-4P (blue), and FGFR1K-5P (magenta). (B) KinTekSim mechanism showing the dimerization step and the autophosphorylation reaction. The second order rate constants for dimerization (k1) and ATP binding (k2, k4, k6, k8, and k10) were 400 and 0.0175 mM−1s−1, respectively. The rate constant for the FGFR1K monophosphorylation (k3) was 0.054 s−1. The phosphorylation of the subsequent tyrosine residues was increasingly slower, the rate constant being (k5) 0.028, (k7) 0.012, (k9) 0.008, and (k11) 0.004 s−1 for the second, third, forth, and fifth phosphoryl transfer events, respectively. (C) Simplified reaction scheme illustrating the relevant rates of FGFR1K autophosphorylation. Molecular Cell 2006 21, 711-717DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.022) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Two-Step Activation of FGFR1K Kinase Activity (A–C) Summary of FGFR1K purification in different phosphorylation states. Multiple phosphorylated species of FGFR1K are separated by FPLC anion-exchange chromatography (A), and the phosphorylation state of homogeneous preparations is confirmed by native PAGE (B) and ESI-TOF MS (C). (D) The autophosphorylation reaction of FGFR1K-0P and FGFR1K-1P was followed in the presence of 5 mM ATP and 10 mM MgCl2. The decay of unphosphorylated (•) and monophosphorylated (▴) FGFR1K (12.5 μM) is followed as these species are converted to mono- and diphosphoryl-FGFR1K, respectively. The data were fit to exponential decay equation, and the reaction rates were 0.015 ± 0.02 s−1 and 0.16 ± 0.03 s−1 for the autophosphorylation of the unphosphorylated and monophsphorylated FGFR1K, respectively. (E) Phosphorylation of recombinant PLCγ fragment by unphosphorylated (•), mono- (▾), and diphosphorylated (■) FGFR1K-3F. The reaction rates for PLCγ phosphorylation by the mono- and diphosphorylated FGFR1K-3F were 0.027 and 0.25 min−1, respectively. The reaction rate in the presence of unphosphorylated FGFR1K-3F was estimated as <0.0005 min−1. (F) Phosphorylation of FRS2α derived peptide by unphosphorylated (•), mono- (▾), and diphosphorylated (■) FGFR1K-3F. The reaction rates for peptide phosphorylation by the mono- and diphosphorylated FGFR1K-3F were 0.08 and 0.3 min−1, respectively. The reaction rate in the presence of unphosphorylated FGFR1 was estimated as <0.0005 min−1. The increase in PLCγ and peptide phosphorylation at time points higher than 40 min is most likely due to the conversion of unphosphorylated FGFR1K-3F to monophosphorylated FGFR1K-3F. Molecular Cell 2006 21, 711-717DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.022) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions