Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using Text Effectively in the Biology Classroom
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Next Generation Content Area Reading Professional Development (NGCARPD) Summer 2012 Using Common Core to Enhance your Instruction 1.
Making the Connection to Assessment. Three components: Common Core State Standards Excellent Matches to State Curriculum Essential Skills and Knowledge.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the.
New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment.
Addressing Common Core Standards Using
ACTFL’s Alignment of the Standards with the Common Core
ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
TEXT-DEPENDENT QUESTIONS building a critical foundation of knowledge needed for comprehending complex texts.
Shifting Gears! A Professional Development Session Designed to Support Turnkey Training on the Shifting Gears Initiatives Educator.
Copyright ©2011 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 3.
1 K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.
NJ ASK Family Night English Language Arts Presented By: Anne Scaffo, ELA Instructional Coach Ted Peters, Reutter School Principal.
Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy
Informational Text Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert Daiber.
Session 2: Informational Text Audience: Science, Social Studies, Technical Subject Teachers.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy
Common Core State Standards Standardizing What We Know Watch this short video.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
THE ALLENDALE PARENTS AS PARTNERS SERIES PRESENTS: P A RCC AND THE COMMON CORE NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Science Research Simulation Task Science High School Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
PARCC ELA Evidence Tables September 25, Today’s Outcomes Identify how Evidence-Centered Design informs the PARCC Summative Assessment. Identify.
Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Instructional Shifts Activity 1.
Session 1: Understanding the Organization Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Teachers.
Office of Curriculum and Instruction Division of Language Arts/Reading.
PERFORMANCE TASKS. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE Students create products or perform tasks to show their mastery of a particular skill Students select a response.
A Conversation Across the Disciplines to Integrate Literacy into Middle & Secondary Classrooms Drs. Pixita del Hill Prado, Ellen Friedland, & Jevon Hunter.
Anne Zeman, Ed.D., Director, Curriculum/Professional Learning Don Azevada, Program Specialist, History/Social Science Ray Pietersen, Program Specialist,
Launching the Common Core State Standards Embrace Initiative Presented by Brittany Austin Literacy Interventionist.
Maryland Assessment Group Conference Wednesday, October 22, 2014.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
Linking Disciplinary Literacies to the Common Core State Standards EDC 448 Dr. Julie Coiro.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
ELA Common Core State Standards Overview of the Big Shifts in Common Core Standards for English Language Arts Overview of the Standards for Literacy in.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
THINK / PUZZLE / EXPLORE Think about what you may have read as part of the pre-reading activity for this workshop as well as what you already know about.
Got Citizenship? September 12, 2013 Common Core: Close Reading.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
Close Reading. AGENDA Demands of complex text on the reader Close reading tools for comprehending complex text Question and answer opportunities with.
Quality Criteria for Selecting Texts Worth Reading September
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Advances in the PARCC ELA/Literacy Assessment August
Using the PARCC Rubrics to Analyze Student Writing College Career Ready Conference 2015.
College and Career Ready Conference  Participants will be able to:  Review the design of the PARCC assessments.  Analyze the Literary Analysis.
Common Core State Standards ELA and Literacy 2012 Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Publisher Meeting Today: Common Core State Standards Oregon Shifts 1 ODE.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
Rhode Island Department of Education Diane Girard & Colleen O’Brien.
Assessing Math Looking closer at PARCC Task Types 2.
1. PARCC is designed to reward quality instruction aligned to the Common Core State Standards, so the assessment is worthy of preparation rather than.
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
+ PARCC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Common Core State Standards and Assessments of Student Mastery 1.
Reflecting on the Shifts in Assessment. English Language Arts.
In the Age of Common Core. Close Reading of text involves an investigation of a short piece of text, with multiple readings done over multiple instructional.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Writing to Learn – ELA/Reading
Illinois State Board of Education English Language Arts
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables
Illinois State Board of Education English Language Arts
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables

The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on the PARCC Summative Assessment. Evidences are attached to the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary claims presented by PARCC. Evidences describe what students might say or do to demonstrate mastery of the standards. An item on the PARCC assessment may measure multiple standards and multiple evidences. What are ELA Evidence tables? 2

3 ELA/Literacy Claims for the PARCC Summative Assessments

Reading an Evidence Table Grade Claim Standards: RL –Reading Literary RI – Reading Information Evidences 4

Reading an Evidence Table for Grades Standards: In Grades 6 – 11 Literacy Standards for Reading History/Social Studies and for Reading Science/Technical are added RH – Reading History/Social Studies RST – Reading Science/Technical 5

Reading a Vocabulary Evidence Table Standards: L – Language 6

Reading the Writing Evidence Tables Grade Claim Standards: W - Writing Evidences 7

To see ways to combine standards naturally when designing instructional tasks To help determine alignment of a complex text with standards for instructional passage selection To develop the stem for questions/tasks for instruction aligned with the standards To determine and create instructional scaffolding (to think through which individual, simpler skills can be taught first to build to more complex skills) To develop rubrics and scoring tools for classroom use Instructional uses of the evidence statements/tables for teachers 8

Standard 1 on the Evidence Tables Standard 1 All items measuring this claim require students to read a text prior to responding to the items (i.e. the item is text dependent) This standard is always combined with the assessment of other standards. All questions are text dependent. 9

Using the Evidence Table: Part 1 For example, if one were to view the third grade evidence table for Reading Information Standard 2, he/she would view the following: To begin planning, one would need to first determine which of the evidences he/she would want students to be able to demonstrate. It is important to keep in mind that more than one evidence may be chosen. Next, when planning lessons it would be beneficial to determine the complex informational text(s) that the students will use as a basis for determining the main idea and/or recounting the key details and/or providing an explanation of how the key details support the main idea. 10

Alignment of a complex text with standards for instructional passage selection It is important when selecting texts that: Texts stem from across the disciplines (e.g. ELA, history, science and technical subjects), are written by authors with diverse backgrounds, reflect the CCSS prescribed balances of literature and informational text, and appeal to a wide range of student audiences. Texts are authentic works of exceptional craft and/or rich repositories of ideas and information Text pairings, where required by the CCSS, have meaningful and significant points of comparison that invite questions beyond superficial observations Texts appeal to student interest and appeal to a wide audience Texts avoid highly controversial topics that may be troublesome to students Refer to Passage Selection Guidelines for Assessing CCSS and the Bias and Sensitivity Guidelines for more detailed information about the selecting of passages for students. 11

Using the Evidence Table: Part 2 For example, if one were to view the third grade evidence table for Reading Information Standard 2, he/she would view the following: Once text (s) have been selected it is important to consider what question(s) will be posed to the students that will be supportive of the evidences they will be asked to demonstrate. When considering the development of such questions it is important that the text dependent questions delve systematically into a text(s) to guide students in extracting the key meanings or ideas found there. 12

Good text dependent questions will often linger over specific phrases and sentences to ensure careful comprehension of the textthey help students see something worthwhile that they would not have seen on a more cursory reading. An effective set of text dependent questions delves systematically into a text to guide students in extracting the key meanings or ideas found there. They typically begin by exploring specific words, details, and arguments and then moves on to examine the impact of those specifics on the text as a whole. Along the way they target academic vocabulary and specific sentence structures as critical focus points for gaining comprehension. Text Dependent Questions 13

3 rd Grade Sample Informational Text: Main Idea Question RI 2 Provides a statement of the main idea of a text. (1) Provides a recounting of key details in a text. (2) Provides an explanation of how key details in a text support the main idea. (3) The question requires students to determine the main idea of the passage. Students must use close reading to not only determine the main idea but to select the textual evidence that will justify the chosen main idea. 14

Prose Constructed Response Questions Questions that require a written response: Allow students to elicit evidence demonstrating that they have understood a text or texts read Allow students to demonstrate that they can communicate that understanding well both in terms of written expression and knowledge of language and conventions Allow teachers the opportunity to provide feedback on how individual pieces of writing meet or do not meet the criteria for quality writing 15

Proposed Writing Rubrics Three primary components to the rubrics: A reading assessment component A written expression component (which has several sub-components) A knowledge of language and conventions component. The use of this single rubricregardless of task purpose Allows for the focus of evaluation of the quality of a written response to be on key traits of quality of reading comprehension (including providing strong evidence from texts) Allows for focus on quality writing rather than on any single, discrete criterion Reinforces student preparation for prose to be written in college and careers, where quality is defined by addressing the demands of a task, rather than on an isolated skill 16

Proposed Writing Rubrics: Reading Portion 17

Proposed Writing Rubrics

Proposed Writing Rubrics: Knowledge of Language and Conventions Portion 19

Key Points to Remember In all Evidence Tables for Grades 3 – 11 Standard 1 is always combined with the teaching of any of the other standards. More than one evidence may be combined with Standard 1. Texts need to be complex literary or informational text (s)that students will use as a basis for their answers. Effective text dependent questions require students to draw evidence from a text to support their answers. Careful and close reading is required in order to determine meaning and answer questions. Written tasks should require writing to sources rather than to a de-contextualized or generalized prompt and should require students to apply the knowledge of language and conventions. 20

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers